KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Medicine Science / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Effectiveness of a health improving model on oral health behavior for adolescents by nursing interventions

FADİME ÜSTÜNER TOP
Ayşe Ferda OCAKCI
Sayfa
83–88
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusions: The nursing attempts that were applied to Pender’s Health Promotion Model and Gagne’s Theory of Information Proccessing were effective for improving the oral health behavior.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Information Processing Theory and Improving Health Model by nursing interventions were applied to adolescents with low oral and dental health behavior.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:According to the results of oral health care form, individuals that are chosen from bottom 25% of the attitude scale were placed in the experimental (n=40) and control (n=40) groups randomly.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusions: The nursing attempts that were applied to Pender’s Health Promotion Model and Gagne’s Theory of Information Proccessing were effective for improving the oral health behavior.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Information Processing Theory and Improving Health Model by nursing interventions were applied to adolescents with low oral and dental health behavior. The method of study has an experimental design with pre-test and post-test control groups. According to the results of oral health care form, individuals that are chosen from bottom 25% of the attitude scale were placed in the experimental (n=40) and control (n=40) groups randomly. The data were collected by four different forms of which are personal information form, multi-dimensional oral health control scale (MOHLCS), oral health care form (ODHB) and oral examination form. Increased mean internal focus control point which was a sub-scale of MOHLCS scale was found in the experimental group compared to control group. The mean score of ODHB after the post test and re-test between the groups, a statistically significant difference was determined in favor of the experimental group. Conclusions: The nursing attempts that were applied to Pender’s Health Promotion Model and Gagne’s Theory of Information Proccessing were effective for improving the oral health behavior.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TOP, F. Ü., OCAKCI, A. F. (2018). Effectiveness of a health improving model on oral health behavior for adolescents by nursing interventions. Medicine Science, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 83–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/277154

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Hayran O, Aksayan S. Pratisyen Hekimlerde İş Doyumu. Toplum ve Hekim. WHO. Oral Health Programme World Health Organization Geneva Switzerland, Bulletin of the World Health Organization September. 2005;83(9). Ayrancı U. A study on dental caries ın a group of primary school students. STED. 2005; 14(3):50-4.
  2. Gökalp S, Doğan GB, Tekçicek M, Berberoğlu A, Unlüer S. The oral health profile of 5, 12 and 15 year olds, Turkey-2004. Journal of Hacettepe Faculty of Dentistry. 2007; 31(4):3-10.
  3. Simmer-Beck M, Walker M, Gadbury-Amyot C, Liu Y, Kelly P, Branson B, Effectiveness of an alternative dental workforce model on the oral health of low-income children in a school-based setting, Am J Public Health. 2015;105(9): 1763–9.
  4. Phillips E, Gwozdek EA, Shaefer HL, Safety net care and midlevel dental practitioners: A case study of the portion of care that might be performed under various setting and scope-of-practice assumptions, Am J Public Health. 2015;105(9):1770–6. Crall JJ. Oral health policy development since the surgeon general’s report on oral health. Acad Pediatr. 2009;9:476-82.
  5. Peker K, Bermek G. Oral health: locus of control, health behavior, self-rated oral health and socio-demographic factors in Istanbul adults. Acta Odontol Scan. 2011;69(1):54-64.
  6. Alıcı US, Sarıkaya O. Experimental learning practice in building up health behavior. Electronic Journal of Dokuz Eylul University School of Nursing. 2009;2(3):95-101.
  7. Pender N J, Murdaugh CL, Parsons MA. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice, 5thEdition,
  8. Pearson Education, New Jersey. 2006. Gagne RM. URL: http://ide.ed.psu.edu/idde/9events.ht. 2002. access date 22.10.2013
  9. Rankin SH, Stallings KD. Patıent Educatıon Principles&Practice. 2001;95-6. Doğan GB. Basic indicators of oral and dental health. Public Health Bulletin. 2007;26 (2): 40-1.
  10. Gilbert A, Nuttall NM. Self-reporting of periodental health status. Br Dent J. 1999;186(5):241-4.
  11. Chang C, Chang FM, Nakagaki H, Morita I, Tsuboi S, Sakakibara Y, Yanagihara T, Watanabe K, Robinson C. Comparison of the health and selfrated general health status of undergraduate students in Taiwan and Japan. J Dent Sci. 2010;5:221-8.
  12. Köse S, Güven D, Mert E, Eraslan E, Esen S. The effectiveness of oral hygyen education among children aged 12-13 year. J Anatolia Nurs Health Sci. 2010;13(4):44-52.
  13. Onal E, Erbil S, Gürtekin B, Ayvaz O, Ozel S, Cevizli S, Güngör G. Perceptıon of Self Health Among Primary School Students and Their Knownedgle of Health Matters. Nobel Medicus. 2009;5(2):24