Dergiler / Medicine Science / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

The risks and benefits of non-predictive splenectomy: The necessity of splenectomy and early postoperative outcomes

Sayfa
203–207
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Even if the preoperative investigation does not show any indication for splenectomy, but the surgeon has intraoperative concerns about sub-optimal oncological surgery without splenectomy, we recommend that the surgeon should perform the splenectomy.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Although, most splenectomy is predictive due to preoperative tests, sometimes the decision to perform the splenectomy is made intraoperatively for non-primary splenic diseases.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Preoperative, operative, and 1-month postoperative data included to study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Even if the preoperative investigation does not show any indication for splenectomy, but the surgeon has intraoperative concerns about sub-optimal oncological surgery without splenectomy, we recommend that the surgeon should perform the splenectomy.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Although, most splenectomy is predictive due to preoperative tests, sometimes the decision to perform the splenectomy is made intraoperatively for non-primary splenic diseases. The aim of this study to investigate the risks, benefits and necessity of non-predictive of splenectomy and early outcomes. Splenectomy was performed as predictive splenectomy (PS) for primary splenic diseases and non-predictive splenectomy (Non-PS) for non-primary splenic diseases. Preoperative, operative, and 1-month postoperative data included to study. Between June 2012 and July 2018, 108 patients underwent splenectomy. Of these patients, 67 (62%) had PS for primary splenic disease, and 41 (38%) had non-PS due to non-primary splenic diseases. Patients with PS were statistically younger compared to Non-PS patients (52.82 ± 15.07 vs. 44.32 ± 19.23 years, p = 0.022). The most common cause of splenectomy in the PS group was immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) in 16 (23.9%) and splenic trauma in 16 (23.9%), whereas in the non-PS group the major causes were gastric cancer in 16 (39%) and pancreas cancer in 10 (24.4%). Patients in the PS group had significantly lower postoperative hospital stay day (11.2 ± 7.3 vs. 6.4 ± 4.2, p = 0.001). The total complication rate was statistically higher in the non-PS patients (31.7% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.012). However, no significant differences were found in the postoperative infection rates (17% in non-PS versus 7.5% in PS, p = 0.22). Even if the preoperative investigation does not show any indication for splenectomy, but the surgeon has intraoperative concerns about sub-optimal oncological surgery without splenectomy, we recommend that the surgeon should perform the splenectomy.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜNAY, Y., TAŞDÖVEN, İ. (2019). The risks and benefits of non-predictive splenectomy: The necessity of splenectomy and early postoperative outcomes. Medicine Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 203–207. https://ajindex.com/articles/276932

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Brunicardi FC, Anderson DK, Billiar TR, et al. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery, Tent Editon, 34th Chapter. 2015, p. 1420-39. Katz SC1, Pachter HL. Indications for splenectomy. Am Surg. 2006;72:565-80.
  2. Rodeghiero F, Ruggeri M. Short- and long-term risks of splenectomy for benign haematological disorders: should we revisit the indications? Br J Haematol. 2012;158:16-29.
  3. Bagrodia N, Button AM, Spanheimer PM, et al. Morbidity and mortality following elective splenectomy for benign and malignant hematologic conditions: analysis of the american college ofsurgeons national surgical quality improvement program data. JAMA Surgery.2014;149:1022-29.
  4. Edgren G, Almqvist R, Hartman M, et al. Splenectomy and the risk of sepsis: a population-based cohort study. Ann Surg 2014;260:1081–87. Sinwar PD. Overwhelming post splenectomy infection syndrome - review study. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1314-16.
  5. Xiang L, Tu Y, He T, et al. Distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy for the management of splenic hilum metastasis in cytoreductive surgery of epithelial ovarian cancer. J Gynecol. Oncol. 2016;27:62-3.
  6. Weitz J, Jaques DP, Brennan M, et al. Association of splenectomy with postoperative complications in patients with proximal gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11:682–89
  7. Yu W, Choi GS, Chung HY. Randomized clinical trial of splenectomy versus splenic preservation in patients with proximal gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:559–63.
  8. Sano T, Sasako M, Mizusawa J, et al. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate splenectomy in total gastrectomy for proximal gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2017;265:277-83.
  9. Usui S, Tashiro M, Haruki S, et al. Spleen preservation versus splenectomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: A comparison of short-term outcomes. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2016;9:5-13.
  10. Son SY, Shin DJ, Park YS, et al. Spleen-preserving lymphadenectomy versus splenectomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Oncol. 2017;26:207-211.
  11. Yoo YJ, Yang SJ, Hwang HK, et al. Overestimated oncologic significance of lymph node metastasis in g1 nonfunctioning neuroendocrine tumor in the left side of the pancreas. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:1404. He Z, Qian D, Hua J, et al. Clinical comparison of distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:91593. Tang CW, Feng WM, Bao Y, et al. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy or distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy?: Periop