Dergiler / Medicine Science / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the relationship between the level of spinal vertebra injuries due to traffic accidents and additional injuries

Sayfa
145–149
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Although vertebral injuries are mostly evaluated together with patients with multiple trauma, it should not be forgotten its relationship with additional injuries.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Vertebral injuries are mostly seen in patients with multiple trauma.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The mean age of the 166 spinal trauma patients included in the study was 36.7±15.4 (Median:35; 95% Cl:34.1-38.7) years and 65.7% of the patients were male.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Although vertebral injuries are mostly evaluated together with patients with multiple trauma, it should not be forgotten its relationship with additional injuries.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Vertebral injuries are mostly seen in patients with multiple trauma. Because of high energy trauma, especially in young patients, it is associated with additional injuries. It was observed that there are not enough studies on this subject in our country. In this study, we aimed to explain the incidence of vertebral injuries and the characteristics of both concomitant and vertebral injuries and contribute to the literature by investigating the presence of additional injuries in patients with vertebral injuries resulting from traffic accidents. Data were recorded on the age, sex, type of trauma, spinal injury level, additional organ injury, GCS, neurological deficits, intensive care admittance, and mortality status of all patients. The data used in the study were obtained from the hospital’s automation system and patients’ files. The mean age of the 166 spinal trauma patients included in the study was 36.7±15.4 (Median:35; 95% Cl:34.1-38.7) years and 65.7% of the patients were male. Mortality rate in emergency department was 0.6%, mortality frequency was not associated with additional organ injury, trauma cause and spinal level but the results were not statistically significant (p> 0.05). The presence of additional injury increased the frequency of intensive care admission, the results were statistically significant (p <0.05). Because of spinal injuries are sult of high-energy traumas, additional organ injuries are common pathologies. For this reason, patients with spinal trauma should be evaluated for additional injuries. Although vertebral injuries are mostly evaluated together with patients with multiple trauma, it should not be forgotten its relationship with additional injuries.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALKAN, C., AKCA, H. S., KOKULU, K., OZDEMİR, S., EROGLU, S. E., YİLDİZ, M. N. (2020). Evaluation of the relationship between the level of spinal vertebra injuries due to traffic accidents and additional injuries. Medicine Science, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 145–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/276864

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Çolak A, Karaoğlan A, Barut S, et al.Neuroprotection and Functional Recovery after Application of the Caspase-9 inhibitor z-LEHD-fmk in a Rat Model of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury, J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3:327-34
  2. Dryden DM, Saunders LD, Rowe BH, et al. The Epidemiology of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Alberta, Canada. The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Le J Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques. 2003;2:113-21
  3. Go S. Spine travma In Emergency Medicine. A Comprehensive Study Guide. 8 th edition Tintinalli JE. (eds.)McGraw-Hill, New York 2016;1708-24
  4. Sweileh WM, Abu-Hadeed HM, Al-Jabi SW, et al. Prevalence of Depression among People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Cross Sectional Study in Palestine. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:163
  5. Amar AP, Levy ML. Pathogenesis and Pharmacological Strategies for Mitigating Secondary Damage in Acute Spinal Cord Injury. Neurosurgery. 1999;5:1027-40
  6. Robertson A, Giannoudis PV, Branfoot T, et al. Spinal Injuries in Motorcycle Crashes: Patterns and Outcomes. J Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2002;1:5-8
  7. Leucht P, Fischer K, Muhr G, et al Epidemiology of Traumatic Spine Fractures. Injury. 2009;2:166-72
  8. Prasad V, Schwartz A, Bhutani R, et al. Characteristics of Injuries to the Cervical Spine and Spinal Cord in Polytrauma Patient Population: Experience from a Regional Trauma Unit. Spinal cord. 1999;8:560-8
  9. Vives MJ, Kishan S, Asghar J, et al. Spinal Injuries in Pedestrians Struck by Motor Vehicles. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques. 2008;4:281-7
  10. Nelson DW, Martin MJ, Martin ND, et al. Evaluation of the Risk of Noncontiguous Fractures of the Spine in Blunt Trauma. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2013;1:135-9
  11. Dolay K, Kocataş A, Aliş H, et al. Cervical Spine Injuries. Turkish J Trauma. 1999;1:31-4
  12. Yilmaz F, Sonmez BM, Beydilli I, et al. Spinal fractures as an Indicator of Concurrent other System Injuries: An analysis of 242 cases. Biomedical Research. 2017;3:1006-11
  13. Roberge RJ, Wears RC, Kelly M, et al. Selective Application of Cervical Spine Radiography in alert Victims of Blunt Trauma: a Prospective Study. J Trauma. 1988;6:784-8
  14. Loo GT, Siegel JH, Dischinger PC, et al. Airbag Protection Versus Compartment Intrusion Effect Determines the Pattern of Injuries in Multiple Trauma Motor Vehicle Crashes. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 1996;6:935-51
  15. Siegel JH, Smith JA, Siddiqi SQ. Change in Velocity and Energy Dissipation on impact in Motor