Dergiler / Medicine Science / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

The frequency and causes of pes equinavarus in the neonatal intensive care unit in a tertiary care center from eastern in anatolia

Sayfa
556–559
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We believe that future studies (such as genetic studies) will be more beneficial to science than classical knowledge about PEV etiology.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:PEV is one of the most common deformities in the foot.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, we aimed to share our experience with the incidence and etiology of PEV in the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital. 3658 patients who were followed up in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit from 2014 to 2017 were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We believe that future studies (such as genetic studies) will be more beneficial to science than classical knowledge about PEV etiology.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

PEV is one of the most common deformities in the foot. The incidence of PEV varies between communities and many theories about its etiology have been proposed. In this study, we aimed to share our experience with the incidence and etiology of PEV in the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital. 3658 patients who were followed up in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit from 2014 to 2017 were included in the study. Data on the number and etiology of newborns with PEV deformity were obtained from the automation records of our hospital. PEV deformity was diagnosed in 32 (0.87%) of 3658 babies treated in the neonatal intensive care unit over a period of 3 years. Of these 32 patients, 18 (56.25%) were bilateral, and 14 (43.75%) unilateral PEV. Two (6.25%) of our patients had a positive family history. While 23(71.87%)) of our patients were delivered by cesarean, 9 (28,1%) of our patients were born normally. Considering birth weights, the number of babies born under 2500 grams was 7 (21.8%), and the number of babies born above 2500 grams was 25 (78.1%). Considering the data we obtained at the end of the study, the incidence of PEV was lower than in the literature. In fact, our hypothesis before starting the study was that the incidence of PEV was higher in the neonatal intensive care unit. Although the frequency of PEV is known to vary between populations, the etiology of PEV is not fully known. We believe that future studies (such as genetic studies) will be more beneficial to science than classical knowledge about PEV etiology.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZKAN, S., ADANAŞ, C., BAŞARANOĞLU, M. (2020). The frequency and causes of pes equinavarus in the neonatal intensive care unit in a tertiary care center from eastern in anatolia. Medicine Science, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 556–559. https://ajindex.com/articles/276750

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Waschak K, Radler C, Grill F. Der kongenitale Klumpfuss Congenital club foot. Z Orthop Unfall. 2009;147:241–62
  2. Minkowitz B, Finkelstein BI, Bleicher M. Percutaneous tendo-Achilles lengthening with a large-gauge needle: a modification of the Ponseti technique for correction of idiopathic clubfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43:263–5
  3. Göksan S. Bora: Doğuştan çarpık ayağın ponseti yöntemi ile tedavisi Acta ortopodica et Traumatol Turcica. 2002:36:281-7
  4. Dyer PJ, Davis N. The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1082–4
  5. Penny JN. The neglected clubfoot. Techniques Orthop. 2005;20:153–66
  6. Sevimli R, Ceylan MF, Yıldırım E, et al. Is reassessment of radiographs taken from pediatric patients useful for detecting unrecognised hip dysplasia? East J Med. 2017;22:180-3
  7. Werler MM, Yazdy MM, Mitchell AA, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of idiopathic clubfoot. Am J Med Genet A. 2013;161A:1569–78
  8. Tachdjian’s pediatric orthopaedics 3 ed, Editor: R. Lampert. W.B. Saunders Company 2002
  9. Staheli LT. Foot. In: Staheli LT, editor. Practice of pediatric orthopedics. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.2001;89–114
  10. Byron-Scott R, Sharpe P, Hasler C, et al, A South Australian populationbased study of congenital talipes equinovarus. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2005;19:227-37
  11. Widhe T. Foot deformities at birth: a longitudinal prospective study over a 16-year period. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17:20–4
  12. Wynne-Davies R. Family studies and the cause of congenital clubfoot, talipes equinovarus, talipes calcaneo-valgus and metatarsus varus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1964;46:445–63
  13. Hootnick DR, Levinsohn EM, Crider RJ, et al. Congenital arterialmalformations associated with clubfoot. A report of two cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;167:160–3
  14. Dunn PM. Congenital postural deformities: perinatal associations. Proc R SocMed. 1972;65:735–8
  15. Bonnell J, Cruess RL. Anomalous insertion of the soleus muscle as a cause of fixed equinus deformity. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:999– 1000
  16. Gurnett CA, Boehm S, Connolly A, et al. Impact of congenital talipes equinovarus etiology on treatment outcomes. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:498–502
  17. Lochmiller C, Johnston D, Scott A, et al. Genetic epidemiology study of idiopathic talipes equinovarus. Am J Med Genet. 1998;79:90–6
  18. Cummings RJ, Davidson RS, Armstrong PF, et al. Congenital clubfoot. J Bon