Dergiler / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2007 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

A Goal Programming Approach to Weight Dispersion in Data Envelopment Analysis

Sayfa
117–125
Yayın Tarihi
2010-03-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This conclusion is confirmed by the computational results obtained when the two models are applied to a real data set relative to the socio-economic performances of European countries and to randomly generated instances with various numbers of decision making units, inputs and outputs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, a multi-criteria data envelopment analysis (MCDEA) model, used in the literature to moderate the homogeneity of weights dispersion, is solved using pre-emptive goal programming.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The MCDEA model solved using pre-emptive goal programming gives the same relative efficiency as the classical DEA model while it improves the homogeneity of input-output weights.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This conclusion is confirmed by the computational results obtained when the two models are applied to a real data set relative to the socio-economic performances of European countries and to randomly generated instances with various numbers of decision making units, inputs and outputs.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Data envelopment analysis · weight dispersion · pre-emptive goal programming

Abstract

In this study, a multi-criteria data envelopment analysis (MCDEA) model, used in the literature to moderate the homogeneity of weights dispersion, is solved using pre-emptive goal programming. The MCDEA model solved using pre-emptive goal programming gives the same relative efficiency as the classical DEA model while it improves the homogeneity of input-output weights. This conclusion is confirmed by the computational results obtained when the two models are applied to a real data set relative to the socio-economic performances of European countries and to randomly generated instances with various numbers of decision making units, inputs and outputs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAL, H., ÖRKÇÜ, H. H. (2010). A Goal Programming Approach to Weight Dispersion in Data Envelopment Analysis. Gazi University Journal of Science, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 117–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/255605

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., “Measuring The Efficiency of Decision Making Units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-, (1978).
  2. Meza, L.A., Lins, M.P.E., “Review of Methods for Increasing Discrimination in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Annals of Operations Research, 116, 242, (2002).
  3. Thompson, R.G., Singleton, F.G., Thrall, R.M., Smith, B.A., ”Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas”, Interfaces, 16: 35-49, (1986).
  4. Thompson, R.G., Langemeier, L.N., Lee, C.T., Thrall, R.M., “The Role of Multiplier Bounds in Efficiency Analysis with Application to Kansas Farming”, Journal of Econometrics, 46: 93-108 (1990).
  5. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W, Huang, Z.M., Sun, D.B., “Polyhedral Cone-Ratio Models with an Illustrative Application to Large Commercial Banks”, Journal of Econometrics, 46: 73-91 (1990).
  6. Wong, Y.H.B, Beasley, J.E., “Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(9): 829-835 (1990).
  7. Zhu, J., “Data Envelopment Analysis with Preference Structure”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47, 136-150 (1996).
  8. Halme, M., Joro, T., Korhonen, P., Salo, S., Wallenius, J., “A Value Efficiency Approach to Incorporating Preference Information in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Management Science, 45, 115, (1999).
  9. Jahanshahloo, G.R., Memariani, A., Hosseinzadeh, F., Shoja, N., “A Feasible Interval for Weights in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 160, 155-168, (2005).
  10. Allen, R., Athanassopoulos, A., Dyson, R.G., Thanassoulis, E., “Weight Restrictions and Value Judgement in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, Development and Future Directions”, Annals of Operations Research, 73, 13-34, (1997).
  11. Podinovski, V.V., Athanassopoulos, A., “Assessing the Relative Efficiency of Decision Making Units in DEA Models with Weight Restrictions”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49, 500-508 (1998).
  12. Podinovski, V.V., “Computation Efficient Targets in DEA Models with Production Trade-offs and Weight Restrictions”, European Journal of Operational Research, 181, 586-591, (2007).
  13. Cooper, W.W., Ruiz, J.L., Sirvent I., "Choosing Weights from Alternative Optimal Solutions of Dual Multiplier Models in DEA", European Journal of Operational Research, 180, 443-458, (2007).
  14. Kousmanen, T., Cherchye, L., Sipilainen, T., “The Law of One Price in Data Envelopment Analysis: Restricting Weight Flexibility Across Firms”, European Journal of Ope