Dergiler / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2015 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

Ensuring Success in a Large Scale Software Project: An Examination of the Learning Styles and Characteristics of the Potential End Users

Sayfa
535–540
Yayın Tarihi
2015-12-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Furthermore, the end users were mostly satisfied with the training program, which can be attributed to the efficiency of the curriculum design, sufficiency of the provided facilities and competence of the trainers.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Many software development projects face a high rate of failure, which prevents them from achieving the intended outcome.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:One of the reasons for this might be due to ignoring the end users during the development of the software.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Furthermore, the end users were mostly satisfied with the training program, which can be attributed to the efficiency of the curriculum design, sufficiency of the provided facilities and competence of the trainers.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Software Development Life Cycle · End User Involvement · User Satisfaction

Abstract

Many software development projects face a high rate of failure, which prevents them from achieving the intended outcome. One of the reasons for this might be due to ignoring the end users during the development of the software. To counter this, well-organized training programs can be devised to show end users how to use the software. This training has a crucial role in the success and dissemination of the software development projects. The aim of this study was to examine the correlation between personality traits and learning styles of the end users in a large-scale software development project. The results of the study revealed that there was a distinct relationship between the learning styles and personal attitudes of the users. Personality traits such as extraversion and openness were found to be associated with the learning preferences of individuals. In Kolb’s terms, the converger learners were more open than the diverger learners. Furthermore, the end users were mostly satisfied with the training program, which can be attributed to the efficiency of the curriculum design, sufficiency of the provided facilities and competence of the trainers.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

İNAL, Y., GÜNER, H. (2015). Ensuring Success in a Large Scale Software Project: An Examination of the Learning Styles and Characteristics of the Potential End Users. Gazi University Journal of Science, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 535–540. https://ajindex.com/articles/254508

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Nelson, R. R. Project retrospectives: Evaluating project success, failure, and everything in between, MIS Quarterly Executive 2005, 4(3): 361-372.
  2. İnal, Y., Dikici, A., Tümay, A., Güngör, M. K., Dinçer, K. (2012). Evaluating Nationwide Scattered End user Involvement in Governmental Software Project with Empirical Evidence. 3rd International Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, Ankara,
  3. Türkiye. Nelson R. R., Cheney P.H. Training End users: An Exploratory Study MIS Quarterly 1987, 11(4): 547-559.
  4. Kassim E. S., Jailani S. F. A. K., Hauriddin H., Zamzuri N. H. Information system acceptance and user satisfaction: The mediating role of trust. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2012, 57: 412-418.
  5. Choi, D. H., Kim J., Kim S. H. ERP training with a web-based electronic learning system: The flow theory perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2006, 65: 223-243.
  6. Yaverbaum, G. J., Nosek J. Effects of information system education and training on user satisfaction: An empirical evaluation. Information & Management 1992, 22: 217-225.
  7. Bostrom, R. P., Olfman, L., Sein, M. K. The importance of individual differences in end user training: The case for learning style. Proceedings of ACM SZGCPR Conference on the Management of Information Systems Personnel 1998, 133-141 New York: ACM. Gomez, L.M., Egan, D.E., Bowers, C. Learning to use a text editor: some learner characteristics that predict success. Human-Computer Interaction 1986, 2: 1-23. Kolb D. A. Experiential Learning experience as a source of learning and development, 1984, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Kolb A.Y., Kolb D.A. The Kolb Learning Style Inventory - Version 3.1: 2005, Technical Specifications. Haygroup: Experience Based Learning Systems Inc. Furnham A., Jackson Chris J., Miller T. Personality, learning style and work performance. Personality and Individual Differences 1999, 27: 1113-1122.
  8. Jackson C., Lawty-Jones M. Explaining the overlap between personality and learning style. Personality and Individual Differences 1996, 20: 293-300.
  9. Goldberg, L. R. Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology 1981, 2. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T. Validation of the five- factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987, 52: 81-90. Furnham A. Personality and learning style: a study of three instrumen