Dergiler / Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series C Biology / 2019 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

EVALUATION OF THREAT CATEGORIES OF THE ENDEMIC PLANTS OF DEVECI MOUNTAINS (YOZGAT-TOKAT/TURKEY)

Sayfa
22–34
Yayın Tarihi
2019-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

While Geophytes have the least number of plant taxa with 1 species (1.54%).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Öz This study based on the vegetation field survey between April 1993 and October 1997 is done for the purpose of determining the vegetation of Deveci Mountains (Yozgat-Tokat).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:During the plant vegetation seasons, 1400 plant samples were collected from the research area. 456 taxa and 262 genera to be belonging to 63 families were determined.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:While Geophytes have the least number of plant taxa with 1 species (1.54%).
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anahtar Kelimeler Deveci Mountains · Yozgat · Tokat

Özet

Öz This study based on the vegetation field survey between April 1993 and October 1997 is done for the purpose of determining the vegetation of Deveci Mountains (Yozgat-Tokat). During the plant vegetation seasons, 1400 plant samples were collected from the research area. 456 taxa and 262 genera to be belonging to 63 families were determined. In the survey area, five different vegetation types coniferous and deciduous forest, scrub, steppe, rocky and wet grassland were present. The threat categories of the endemic species of Deveci Mountains were determined and evaluated according to ‘Red Data Book of Turkish Plants’, which was prepared by using IUCN criteria. A total of 65 plant taxa were determined as endemic (14.25% of all taxa). Highest ratios of endemic taxa were from families Fabaceae (16.92%) and Lamiaceae (16.92%). Phytogeographic regions (Chorotypes) among endemic taxa were listed as Irano-Turanian 35 (53.85%), Eastern Mediterranean 3 (4.62%), Euxine 2 (3.08%), Euro-Siberian 1 (1.54%), while phytogeographic origin of (24 taxa) 36.92% of endemic taxa were Unknown. As endemic taxa and their threat categories are evaluated, 1 (1.54%) species was found to in Endangered, 4 (6.15%) in Vulnerable, 7 (10.77%) in Near Threatened and 53 (81.54%) in Least Concern according to IUCN criteria. When the plant taxa were classified and analysed according to Raunkiaer’s life forms, Hemicryptophytes were determined to be the most common plant taxa (76.92%), Chamaephytes come next (9.23%), is followed by the Therophytes (7.69%), and then come Phanerophytes (4.62%). While Geophytes have the least number of plant taxa with 1 species (1.54%).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BINGOL, M. U., BALPINAR, N., GUNEY, K., GEVEN, F., KETENOGLU, O., ARSLAN, M., KARAKAS, M. (2019). EVALUATION OF THREAT CATEGORIES OF THE ENDEMIC PLANTS OF DEVECI MOUNTAINS (YOZGAT-TOKAT/TURKEY). Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series C Biology, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 22–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/247959

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. T. Ekim, M. Koyuncu, M. Vural, H. Duman, Z. Aytaç, N. Adıgüzel, Türkiye Bitkileri Kırmızı Kitabı, Red Data Book of Turkish Plants (Pteridophyta and Spermatophyta). Turkish Association for the Conservation of Nature-Van Centennial University, Ankara, (2000) 246. A.Güner, S.Aslan, T.Ekim, M.Vural, M.T.Babaç (Editors.), Turkiye bitkileri listesi (Damarlı bitkiler). Nezahat Gökyigit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Dernegi Yayını, Istanbul, (2012).
  2. IUCN Species Survival Commision, Draft IUCN Red List Categories. Gland, Switzerland, (1993).
  3. IUCN Species Survival Commision, IUCN Red List Categories: Version 2.3. Gland, Switzerland, (1994).
  4. T. Ekim, M.Koyuncu, S.Erik, R.Ilarslan, Turkiye’nin tehlike altındaki nadir ve endemik bitkileri. Türkiye Tabiatını Koruma Derneği, Ankara, 18, (1989).
  5. Y. Akman, P.H. Daget, Quelques aspects synoptiques des climats de la Turquie. Bull. Soc. Long. Georg. 5(3), (1971) 269-300.
  6. Y. Akman, Iklim ve biyoiklim (Biyoiklim Metodları ve Türkiye Iklimleri). Palme Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, (1990) 319. R. Ilarslan, Deveci dagları’nın (Yozgat-Tokat) florası. Doktora Tezi. Ankara Universitesi Fen Fakultesi Biyoloji Bolumu, TBAG-420 No’lu Proje, Ankara, (1982).
  7. R. Ilarslan, Deveci dagları’nın (Yozgat-Tokat) florası’na katkı. Turkish. Journal of Botany 18(4), (1994) 337-366.
  8. N. Erdogan, O. Ketenoglu, M.U. Bingol, F. Geven, M. Arslan, Evaluation of threat categories of the endemic plants of Sivrihisar mountains, Eskisehir, Turkey. Anadolu Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), (2014) 37-43.
  9. M.Arslan, R.Karataş, S.T.Güner, K. Özkan, Threat categories and endemism status of plants in the distibution areas of pulley oak in the Lakes District. BioDiCon (Biological Diversity and Conservation), 8(1), (2015) 7-15.
  10. U.Budak, A.I.Ilbaş, Karanlıkdere vadisi (Şefaatli-Yerköy-Yozgat)’nde yayılış gösteren endemik bitkilerin tehlike kategorilerinin belirlenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Universitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakultesi Fen Dergisi., Konya, 24, (2004) 29-44.
  11. E. Akcicek, M. Vural, Kumalar dağı (Afyonkarahisar)’ nın endemik ve nadir bitkileri. Balıkesir Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(2), (2007) 78-86.
  12. R.Daskın, G.Kaynak, Conservation status of five endemic species distributed in Northwest Turkey. Phytologia Balcanica, 17(2), (2011) 213-219.
  13. S.G. Senol, H. Yıldırım, A new distribution area of Asperula daphneola (Rubiaceae) in Western Turkey and it’s new recommended IUCN threat category. BioDiCon (Biological Diversity and Conservation), 3(2), (2010) 123-127.