Dergiler / Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series C Biology / 2019 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

THREAT CATEGORIES OF ENDEMIC PLANTS OF SAKARAT MOUNTAIN (AMASYA/TURKEY)

Sayfa
10–21
Yayın Tarihi
2019-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

When the life forms of plant taxa were analysed, it was determined that Hemicryptophytes have the most number of plant taxa with 82.5%, Therophytes and Geophytes have the less than others 2.5%.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Öz This study aims to determine the threat categories of endemic plants in the vegetation of Sakarat Mountain (Amasya) on the basis of the vegetation field survey in 2004 and 2005 years.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:According to results, 78 families, 283 genera and 494 taxa are identified.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:When the life forms of plant taxa were analysed, it was determined that Hemicryptophytes have the most number of plant taxa with 82.5%, Therophytes and Geophytes have the less than others 2.5%.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2004 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Anahtar Kelimeler Sakarat mountain · Amasya · Turkey

Özet

Öz This study aims to determine the threat categories of endemic plants in the vegetation of Sakarat Mountain (Amasya) on the basis of the vegetation field survey in 2004 and 2005 years. Plant samples were collected in their vegetation seasons. According to results, 78 families, 283 genera and 494 taxa are identified. As a result of field surveys, six different vegetation types forest (decidious, mixed coniferous and deciduous), subalpine, steppe, rocky, wet grassland and segetal were determined. 40 plant taxa (8.09% of all taxa) were confirmed as endemic. The families with the highest rate of endemic taxa are Fabaceae (15%) and Lamiaceae (15%). Phytogeographic regions (Chorotypes) among endemic taxa were listed as Irano-Turanian 13 (32.5%), Euro-Siberian 9 (22.5%), Mediterranean 1 (2.5%), while phytogeographic origin of (17 taxa) 42.5% of endemic taxa were Unknown. The threat categories regarding the endemic species were determined and analysed according to “Red Data Book of Turkish Plants” adopted 2001 IUCN criteria. In the evaluation phase of the endemic taxa and their threat categories, it was found that 1 species (2.5%) is in Endangered, 3 species (7.5%) in Near Threatened and 36 species (90%) in Least Concern according to the criteria of 2001 IUCN. When the life forms of plant taxa were analysed, it was determined that Hemicryptophytes have the most number of plant taxa with 82.5%, Therophytes and Geophytes have the less than others 2.5%.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BINGOL, M. U., BALPINAR, N., GUNEY, K., CANSARAN, A., GEVEN, F., KAYA, O. F., ARSLAN, M. (2019). THREAT CATEGORIES OF ENDEMIC PLANTS OF SAKARAT MOUNTAIN (AMASYA/TURKEY). Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series C Biology, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 10–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/247958

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. IUCN Species Survival Commision, Draft IUCN Red List Categories. Gland, Switzerland, (1993).
  2. A. Guner, S. Aslan, T. Ekim, M. Vural, M.T. Babac (Editors), Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler). Nezahat Gokyigit Botanik Bahcesi ve Flora Arastırmaları Dernegi Yayını, Istanbul, (2012).
  3. T. Ekim, M. Koyuncu, S. Erik, R. Ilarslan, Türkiye’nin Tehlike Altındaki Nadir ve Endemik Bitkileri. Türkiye Tabiatını Koruma Dernegi, Ankara, 18, (1989).
  4. IUCN Species Survival Commision, IUCN Red List Categories: Version 2.3. Gland, Switzerland, (1994).
  5. T. Ekim, M. Koyuncu, M. Vural, H. Duman, Z. Aytac, N. Adıguzel, Türkiye Bitkileri Kırmızı Kitabı, Red Data Book of Turkish Plants (Pteridophyta and Spermatophyta). Turkish Association for the Conservation of Nature-Van Centennial University, Ankara, (2000) 246. M.U. Bingol, F. Geven, K. Guney, Sakarat dağı (Amasya)’nın bitki ekolojisi ve bitki sosyolojisi yönünden araştırılması. TUBITAK, Proje No: TOVAG-105O018, (2005-2007) 132. A. Cansaran, M.U. Bingol, F. Geven, K. Guney, N. Erdogan, O.F. Kaya, Sakarat dağı florasına katkılar (Amasya-Türkiye). BioDiCon (Biological Diversity and Conservation), 3(1), (2010) 103-120.
  6. Anonim, Amasya, Taşova ve Turhal’a ait uzun yıllar rasat verileri. T.C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı Devlet Meteoroloji İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü Elektronik Bilgi İşlem Merkezi (EBİM), Ankara, (2007).
  7. Y. Akman, P.H. Daget, Quelques aspects synoptiques des climats de la Turquie. Bull. Soc. Long. Georg., 5(3), (1971) 269-300.
  8. Y. Akman, Climats et bioclimats en Turquie. Ecologia Mediterranea, 1(2), (1981) 73-87.
  9. Y. Akman, O. Ketenoglu, The climate and vegetation of Turkey. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B, Biological Sciences, I.C. Hedge (Editor), Edinburgh, 89, (1986) 123-134.
  10. Y. Akman, İklim ve biyoiklim (Biyoiklim metodları ve Türkiye iklimleri). Palme Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, (1990) 319. N. Erdogan, O. Ketenoglu, M.U. Bingol, F. Geven, M. Arslan, Evaluation of threat categories of the endemic plants of Sivrihisar mountains Eskişehir Turkey. Anadolu Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), (2014) 37-43.
  11. M. Arslan, R. Karatas, S.T. Guner, K. Ozkan, Threat categories and endemism status of plants in the distibution areas of pulley oak in the Lakes District, BioDiCon (Biological Diversity and Conservation), 8(1), (2015) 7-15.
  12. U. Budak, A.I. Ilbaş, Karanlıkdere vadisi (Şefaatli-Yerköy-Yozgat)’nde yayılış gösteren endemik bitkilerin tehlike kategorilerinin belirlenmesi, Suleyman Demirel Universitesi Fen Edeb