KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / European Oral Research / 2018 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3

Comparative evaluation of apical sealing ability of different root canal sealers

Halenur ALTAN
Zeynep GÖZTAŞ
Gülsüm İNCİ
Gül TOSUN
Sayfa
117–121
Yayın Tarihi
2018-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion Sealapex and AH Plus showed significantly better sealing abilities than MTA Fillapex in the long term.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the short and long term apical sealing ability of different root canal sealers.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Teeth were divided into 5 study groups; Group I: MTA Fillapex (Angelus, Brazil); Group II: Sealapex (Sybron-Kerr, Romulus, MI, USA) and Group III: AH Plus (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) (n=15) and negative and positive control groups (n=5).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion Sealapex and AH Plus showed significantly better sealing abilities than MTA Fillapex in the long term.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:MTA fillapex · AH plus · Sealapex

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the short and long term apical sealing ability of different root canal sealers. Materials and methods Fifty-five extracted human anterior single-root teeth were used. The coronal part of each tooth was removed and the root canals were prepared with NiTi rotary instruments. Teeth were divided into 5 study groups; Group I: MTA Fillapex (Angelus, Brazil); Group II: Sealapex (Sybron-Kerr, Romulus, MI, USA) and Group III: AH Plus (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) (n=15) and negative and positive control groups (n=5). The quality of root canal sealing was assessed by a fluid filtration method performed at 24 h and 180-day time intervals. Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests were used to compare the groups. Results At 24 h evaluation, MTA Fillapex presented significantly less microleakage than the Sealapex and AH Plus (p<0.05). At long term interval (180-day), Sealapex and AH Plus presented significantly less microleakage than the MTA Fillapex (p<0.05). Conclusion Sealapex and AH Plus showed significantly better sealing abilities than MTA Fillapex in the long term.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALTAN, H., GÖZTAŞ, Z., İNCİ, G., TOSUN, G. (2018). Comparative evaluation of apical sealing ability of different root canal sealers. European Oral Research, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3, 117–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/242998

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Zhang W, Li Z, Peng B. Assessment of a new root canal sealer’s apical sealing ability. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: e79-82
  2. Mannocci F, Innocenti M, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. Dye leakage and sem study of roots obturated with thermafill and dentin bonding agent. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999; 15: 60-4
  3. Bouillaguet S, Shaw L, Barthelemy J, Krejci I, Wataha JC. Long-term sealing ability of pulp canal sealer, ah-plus, guttaflow and epiphany. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 219-26
  4. Caicedo R, von Fraunhofer JA. The properties of endodontic sealer cements. J Endod 1988; 14: 527-34
  5. Huang TH, Yang JJ, Li H, Kao CT. The biocompatibility evaluation of epoxy resin-based root canal sealers in vitro. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 77-83
  6. Murata SS, Holland R, Souza V, Dezan Junior E, Grossi JA, Percinoto C. Histological analysis of the periapical tissues of dog deciduous teeth after root canal filling with diferent materials. J Appl Oral Sci 2005; 13: 318-24
  7. Sousa-Neto MD, Silva Coelho FI, Marchesan MA, Alfredo E, Silva-Sousa YT. Ex vivo study of the adhesion of an epoxy-based sealer to human dentine submitted to irradiation with Er: YAG and Nd: YAG lasers. Int Endod J 2005; 38: 866-70
  8. Holland R, de Souza V. Ability of a new calcium hydroxide root canal filling material to induce hard tissue formation. J Endod 1985; 11: 535-43
  9. Miranda RB, Fidel SR, Boller MA. L929 cell response to root perforation repair cements: An in vitro cytotoxicity assay. Braz Dent J 2009; 20: 22-6
  10. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, Lee SJ, Monsef M, Pitt Ford TR. Investigation of mineral trioxide aggregate for root-end filling in dogs. J Endod 1995; 21: 603-8
  11. Gomes-Filho JE, Watanabe S, Lodi CS, Cintra LT, Nery MJ, Filho JA, Dezan E, Jr., Bernabe PF. Rat tissue reaction to mta fillapex(r). Dent Traumatol 2012; 28: 452-6
  12. Gomes-Filho JE, Moreira JV, Watanabe S, Lodi CS, Cintra LT, Dezan Junior E, Bernabe PF, Nery MJ, Otoboni Filho JA. Sealability of mta and calcium hydroxidecontaining sealers. J Appl Oral Sci 2012; 20: 347-51
  13. Jafari F, Sobhani E, Samadi-Kafil H, Pirzadeh A, Jafari S. In vitro evaluation of the sealing ability of three newly developed root canal sealers: A bacterial microleakage study. J Clin Exp Dent 2016; 8: e561-5
  14. Wu MK, De Gee AJ, Wesselink PR. Fluid transport and dye penetration along root canal fillings. Int Endod J 1994; 27: 233-8
  15. Gandolfi MG, Prati C. Mta and f-doped mta cements used as sealers with warm gutta-percha