Dergiler / Istanbul Management Journal / 2020 / Sayı: 89

Toxic Leadership: Systematic Review Based on Studies Made in Turkey

Sayfa
73–96
Yayın Tarihi
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Scientific evidence on the importance and dimensions of this problem has been attained through the censoring of the studies on the subject.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this paper was to investigate the Turkish literature on Toxic Leadership over the period of 2000-2019. 26 studies on Toxic Leadership were obtained and 21 studies were evaluated in accordance with the inclusion criteria.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As a result, toxic leadership perception decrease occupational burnout, negative emotional state, loafing behavior, intention and tendency to leave the workplace, job stress, need for the leader; and increase organizational trust, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, personal sense of accomplishment and job commitment.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Scientific evidence on the importance and dimensions of this problem has been attained through the censoring of the studies on the subject.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2000-2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Destructive Leadership · Abusive Leadership · Toxic Leadership

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to investigate the Turkish literature on Toxic Leadership over the period of 2000-2019. 26 studies on Toxic Leadership were obtained and 21 studies were evaluated in accordance with the inclusion criteria. All publications were examined under four main headings. These; destructive leadership, abusive leadership, toxic leadership and measurement tools for destructive, toxic and abusive leadership. In the studies conducted on toxic leadership, most important variables, the measurement tools used, and the organizational factors related to toxic leadership are categorized according to the concepts and sample groups. As a result, toxic leadership perception decrease occupational burnout, negative emotional state, loafing behavior, intention and tendency to leave the workplace, job stress, need for the leader; and increase organizational trust, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, personal sense of accomplishment and job commitment. Female employees, single employees, employees who have less than 10 years of working experience, and private sector employees have a higher perception of toxic leadership. In Turkey, as in the world toxic leadership of the organization perceived as a significant negative factor. Scientific evidence on the importance and dimensions of this problem has been attained through the censoring of the studies on the subject.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OKRAY, Z., ŞİMŞEK, A. H. (2020). Toxic Leadership: Systematic Review Based on Studies Made in Turkey. Istanbul Management Journal, Sayı: 89, 73–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/242654

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Aasland, M. S., Skogstad, A., Notelaers, G., Nielsen, M. B., ve Einarsen, S. (2009). The Prevalence of Destructive Leadership Behaviour. British Journal of Management, 21(2010), 438–452.
  2. Akman, Y. (2016). Yıkıcı Liderlik ile Mesleki Tükenmişlik Arasındaki ilişki: Öğretmenler Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 12(3):627-653.
  3. Anjum, A., Ming, X., Siddiqi, A. F. ve Rasool, F.S. (2018). An Empirical Study Analyzing Job Productivity in Toxic Workplace Environments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15- 35. Appelbaum, S.H. ve Roy-Girard D.( 2007). Toxins in the workplace: affect on organizations and employees, Corporate Governance International Journal of Business in Society, 7(1): 17-28.
  4. Ashforth, B. (1994). Petty Tyranny in Organisations. Human Relations, 47(7), 755-778.
  5. Bacal, R. (2000). Toxic organizations - Welcome to the fire of an unhealthy workplace. Retrieved from http://conflict911.com/conflictarticles/toxicorgs.htm, 04/02/2019.
  6. Bakkal, E. ve Aydıntuğ, N. (2016). Toksik Liderlerin Sağlık Kuruluşları üzerindeki Etkileri, The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 43: 519-522.
  7. Başar, U., Sığrı, Ü. ve Basım, N.(2016).
  8. İş Yerinde Karanlık Liderlik, İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 3(2):65-76.
  9. Bektaş, M. ve Erkal, P.(2015).örgütlerde Toksisite Davranışları. Toksik Duygu Deneyimleri Ölçeğinin Geçerlilik ve Güvenirliği Çalışması, Research Journal of Business and Management, 2(4): 519-529.
  10. Bektaş, M. ve Erkal, P.(2018). Toksik Yönetici Davranışları Ölçeğinin Geçerlilik ve Güvenirliği Çalışması, Ege Akademik Bakış, 18(3):435-444.
  11. Binboğa, G., Eğin, E. ve Gülova, A.(2018). Örgütsel Davranışın Karanlık Yüzü ve Türkçe Literatürün İncelenmesine Yönelik bir Araştırma, Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(1): 382-399.
  12. Bolat, O.İ., Bolat, T., Seymen, O. ve Yüksel M.(2017). İstismarcı Yönetim ve Tükenmişlik: Lider-Üye Etkileşimi ve Güç Mesafesinin Düzenleyici Etkisi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(38): 123-161.
  13. Bozkurt, S., Çoban, Ö. ve Çolakoğlu, M.H. (2018). Örgütsel Güven Düzeyi ve Toksik Liderlik Davranışları İlişkisinde Örgütsel Bağlılığın Aracı Etkisi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. Advance online publication. Byun, G., Karau, S. J., Dai, Y. ve Lee, S. (2018). A three-level examination of the cascading effects of ethical leadership on employee outcomes: A moderated mediation analysis, Journal of Business Research, 88: 44-53.
  14. Carlock, D.H.(2013). Beyond Bullying: