KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Istanbul Management Journal / 2026 / Sayı: 94

Intellectual Capital and Chaos of Innovation: Antagonist Coalition in Organizations

Asiye YÜKSEL
Sayfa
16–27
Yayın Tarihi
2023-06-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Study findings indicate a significant relationship between the antagonist coalition in organizations and the chaos of innovation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:As a critical resource of human capital, employees might be the leading supporters of innovation management considering the integrated intellectual capital.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In addition to the formal organizational structure, employees in an organization usually group informally within the institution.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Study findings indicate a significant relationship between the antagonist coalition in organizations and the chaos of innovation.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Antagonist · Antagonist Coalition · Chaos

Abstract

As a critical resource of human capital, employees might be the leading supporters of innovation management considering the integrated intellectual capital. In addition to the formal organizational structure, employees in an organization usually group informally within the institution. They conflict by taking an opposing role to other informal groups. When a manager/leader comes from outside or "someone from within the organization" takes a new position, conflicting groups quickly take a stand against the newcomer and even come together spontaneously with other groups. Hence, opposition groups’ unity against this newcomer within the organization has been defined as an "Antagonist Coalition in Organizations". The antagonist action structure that is the subject of this article plays a role in innovation management and negatively affects the process. This research examines the chaotic effect of antagonist coalitions on innovation. The semi-structured observation questionnaire was used as a data collection tool in the research. The tables containing the frequency values were used to analyze the survey data. The answers to the open-ended question were analyzed by qualitative data analysis. As a result of the research, most of the participants expressed a positive opinion on an antagonist coalition in organizations and that this would drive innovation into chaos. Study findings indicate a significant relationship between the antagonist coalition in organizations and the chaos of innovation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YÜKSEL, A. (2023). Intellectual Capital and Chaos of Innovation: Antagonist Coalition in Organizations. Istanbul Management Journal, Sayı: 94, 16–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/955440

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Anderson, N. Potocnik, K. & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A state-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary and Guiding Framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333. https://doi.org.10.1177/0149206314527128 google scholar Antunes, H. D. J. G. & Pinheiro, P. G. (2020).
  2. Linking Knowledge Management, Organizational Learning and Memory. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.04.002 google scholar Aragon-Sânchez, A., & Sânchez-Marin, G. (2005).
  3. Strategic Orientation, Management Characteristics, and Performance: A Study of Spanish SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(3), 287-308. google scholar Baxter, P. (2003). The Development of Nurse Decision Making: A Case Study of a Four Year Baccalaureate Nursing Programme. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON. http://hdl.handle.net/11375/6027 google scholar Bonacich, E. (1972). A Theory of Ethnic Antagonism: The Split Labor Market. American Sociological Review 37(October), 547-59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2093450 google scholar Crain, C. M., Kroeker, K. & Halpern, B. S. (2008). Interactive and Cumulative Effects of Multiple Human Stressors in Marine Systems. Ecology Letters, 11(12), 1304-1315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01253.x google scholar Cormican, K., & O’Sullivan, D. (2003). A Collaborative Knowledge Management tool for Product Innovation Management. International Journal of Technology Management, 26(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2003.003144 google scholar Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1985), The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resource. google scholar Crain, C. M., Kroeker, K. & Halpern, B. S. (2008). Interactive and Cumulative Effects of Multiple Human Stressors in Marine Systems. Ecology Letters, 11(12), 1304-1315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01253.x google scholar Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34. https://doi.org/10.5465/256406. google scholar Damanpour, F. (2017). Organizational Innovation. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. google scholar Dearnley, C. (2005). A reflection on the use of Semi-Structured Interviews. Nurse researcher, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2005.07.13.1.19.c5997 google scholar Dickel, D. G., & de Moura, G. L. (2016). Organizational Performance Evaluation