KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Participatory Educational Research / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

The Impact of FeTeMM Activities on 7th Grade Students’ Reflective Thinking Skills for Problem Solving Levels and their Achievements

Recep ÇAKIR
Cansu Ebren OZAN
Emrah KAYA
Büşra BUYRUK
Sayfa
182–189
Yayın Tarihi
2017-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Some recommendations were suggested according to the results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to identfiy the impact of FeTeMM (Science and Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) activities on 7th grade students’ reflective thinking skills for problem solving, academic achievement at math course.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The sampling includes 60 students in the 7th grade attending school during the second term of 2015-2016 academic year.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Some recommendations were suggested according to the results.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015-2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:FeTeMM · Problem solving skills · Math achievement

Abstract

This study aims to identfiy the impact of FeTeMM (Science and Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) activities on 7th grade students’ reflective thinking skills for problem solving, academic achievement at math course. The sampling includes 60 students in the 7th grade attending school during the second term of 2015-2016 academic year. A quasi-experimental research design with two groups pre-test/post- test quantitative methods was used. There were 32 female and 28 male students. 32 students were classified as experimental group and 28 students as control group. The data were collected using “ Reflective Thinking Skills for Problem Solving Scale”, and “ Achievement Test”. During quantitative analysis, t test was used to identify the frequency, mean, median, mode, standard deviation and independent groups. The results of the study indicate that the students’ academic achievement and reflective thinking skills for problem solving have improved. According to t test analysis, there were significant differences between experimental and control group. Some recommendations were suggested according to the results.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇAKIR, R., OZAN, C. E., KAYA, E., BUYRUK, B. (2017). The Impact of FeTeMM Activities on 7th Grade Students’ Reflective Thinking Skills for Problem Solving Levels and their Achievements. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 182–189. https://ajindex.com/articles/239422

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Akins, L., and Burghardt, D. (2006). Work in Progress: Improving K–12 Mathematics Understanding with Engineering Design Projects. In Proceedings from the 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: The heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454-465. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9114-6.
  2. Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30- 35. Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1997). Reseacrh methods in education (4th ed.). Routledge: London and New York. Dewaters, J., S. E. Powers. (2006). Improving science and energy literacy through project-based K-12 outreach efforts that use energy and environmental themes. Proceedings of the 113th Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL. Doppelt, Y., Mehalik, M. M., Schunn, C. D., Silk, E., & Krysinski, D. (2008). Engagement and achievements: a case study of design-based learning in a science context. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 22-39.
  3. Fraenkel, J. R.,& Wallen, N. E. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in education (3th ed ). Mc Graw Hill Higher Education. New York, ABD. Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081-1110.
  4. Garcia, T. (1995). The role of motivational strategies in self-regulated learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 63, 29–42.
  5. Gay, L. R.,& Airasian, P. (2000). Educational research competencies for analysis and application (6th Edition). Ohio: Merrill an imprint of Prentice Hall. Hartzler, D. S. (2000). A meta-analysis of studies conducted on integrated curriculum programs and their effects on student achievement. Doctoral dissertation. IndianaUniversity. International Technology Education Association. (1999).
  6. Technology for All Americans. Reston, VA. ITEA. Judson, E. and Sawada, D. (2000). Examining the effects of a reformed junior high school science class on students’ math achievement. School Science and Mathematics, 100 (8), 419–425.
  7. Lacey, T. A.,& Wright, B. (2009). Occupational employment projections to 2018.
  8. Monthly Labor Review, November, 82-109.
  9. National Research Council (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and purs