KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Research Journal of Business and Management / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

THE DISCLOSURE BEHAVIOR AND PERFORMANCE OF RUSSIAN FIRMS: PUBLIC DISCLOSURE INDEX AND DEA APPLICATION

Eyup Kahveci
Rashad Taliyev
Sayfa
257–266
Yayın Tarihi
2016-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Other 84 firms don’t have total efficiency, technical efficiency or scale efficiency.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper aims, to measure the levels of public disclosure of 92 manufacturing firms listed on Russian Stock Exchange and empirically investigates the link between the level of disclosure and firm performance proxies as of December 2009.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Average score of PDI is 0,69.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Other 84 firms don’t have total efficiency, technical efficiency or scale efficiency.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Public Disclosure Index · firm performance · corporate governance

Abstract

This paper aims, to measure the levels of public disclosure of 92 manufacturing firms listed on Russian Stock Exchange and empirically investigates the link between the level of disclosure and firm performance proxies as of December 2009. To carry out this study, annual financial reports of the firms were accepted as a proxy for the level of disclosure released on firms’ web-sites and the reports used to construct a disclosure index as a yardstick to measure the level of a firm’s disclosure. A disclosure index was constructed as a yardstick to measure the level of firm’s disclosure by using the firms’ annual reports. CCR - DEA model and BCC – DEA model used to obtain efficiency scores. PDI and TA used as inputs, MV, MV/BV and Tobin’s q used as outputs. Average score of PDI is 0,69. The highest PDI was 0.81 and the lowest one was 0.45. Only 7 firms have scale efficiency and the technical efficiency at the same time. Other 84 firms don’t have total efficiency, technical efficiency or scale efficiency.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kahveci, E., Taliyev, R. (2016). THE DISCLOSURE BEHAVIOR AND PERFORMANCE OF RUSSIAN FIRMS: PUBLIC DISCLOSURE INDEX AND DEA APPLICATION. Research Journal of Business and Management, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 257–266. https://ajindex.com/articles/238870

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Akerlof, G., 1970. The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
  2. Ashbaugh, S.H., Collins, D.W., & Lafond, R., 2004. Corporate governance and the cost of equity capital. [Cited 10 February 2015.] Available from URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=639681.
  3. Berle, A., Means, G., 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York, Macmillan Black, B.S., 2002. The corporate governance behavior and market value of russian firms. Emerging markets review, 2(2), 89-108.
  4. Black, Bernard.S., Love I., & Rachinsky, A., 2006. Corporate governance and firms' market values: time series evidence from Russia. Emerging markets review, 7(4), 361—379. Bollen, L., Hassink, H., & Bozic, G., 2006. Measuring and explaining the quality of internet investor relations activities: a multinational empirical analysis. International journal of accounting information systems, 7(4), 273-298.
  5. Botosan, C.A., 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The accounting review, 72 (3), 323-349.
  6. Chow, C.W., & Wong – Boren, A., 1987. Voluntary financial disclosure by Mexican corporations. Accounting review, 62(3), 533-541.
  7. Chung, K.H., Pruitt, W.S., 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial management, 23(3), 70-74.
  8. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K.,.2006. Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses. Springer. Cormier, D., Ledoux, M., & Magnan, M., 2009. The use of web sites as a disclosure platform for corporate performance. International journal of accounting information systems, 10(1), 1-24.
  9. Fan, Z., Wang, L., & Zhang, J., 2003. Corporate competitive strategy and voluntary disclosure. [Cited 11 January 2015.] Available from URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1106614.
  10. Firth, M.A., 1979. The effect of size, stock market listings, and auditors on voluntary disclosure incorporate annual reports. Accounting and business research, 9(36), 273-280.
  11. Gandia, J. L., 2008. Determinants of internet-based corporate governance disclosure by Spanish listed companies. Online information review, 32(6), 791-817.
  12. Griffith, J.M., 1999. CEO ownership and firm value. Managerial and decision economics, 20(1), 1-8.
  13. Huafang, X., & Jianguo, Y., 2007. Ownership structure, board composition and corporate voluntary disclosure.evidence from listed companies in china. Managerial auditing journal, 22(6), 604-619.
  14. Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H., 1976. Theory of the firm