KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Naval Sciences and Engineering / 2018 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Improving an Inefficient Production Line Via AHP and Value Stream Mapping

Gülçin Sedefoğlu
Gulsen Akman
Sayfa
1–22
Yayın Tarihi
2018-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The future state mapping is drawn up to improve the problems seen in the current state mapping and a plan of action was presented for improvements.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Nowadays competition among companies is rapidly increasing with the progress of technology.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In order to stand out in this competition environment, companies need to be renovated in their own fields.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The future state mapping is drawn up to improve the problems seen in the current state mapping and a plan of action was presented for improvements.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Analytic Hierarchy Process · Lean Manufacturing

Abstract

Nowadays competition among companies is rapidly increasing with the progress of technology. In order to stand out in this competition environment, companies need to be renovated in their own fields. Many companies use lean manufacturing techniques to achieve this renewal. In this study, it is aimed to show how Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of Multi Criteria decision making method can be used as in choosing which product line to initially apply value stream mapping method. The study was performed in a company operating in the automotive sector. Criteria for the AHP method were first determined by taking expert opinions and the most suitable product line was selected by applying the AHP method. After that value stream mapping has been applied to the determined product line. The future state mapping is drawn up to improve the problems seen in the current state mapping and a plan of action was presented for improvements.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Sedefoğlu, G., Akman, G. (2018). Improving an Inefficient Production Line Via AHP and Value Stream Mapping. Journal of Naval Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 1–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/238097

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Birgün S., Gülen K.G., Özkan K. 2006. Yalın Üretime Geçiş Sürecinde Değer Akışı Haritalama Tekniğinin Kullanılması: İmalat Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. Vol. 5 (9). Page: 47-59. [10] Balkuvar İ. 2015. Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemlerinden Ahp ve Vikor İle Tablet Seçimi. T. C. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sayısal Yöntemler Anabilim Dalı. İstanbul. [7]Stadnickaa D., Ratnayakeb R.M.C. 2017. Enhancing Aircraft Maintenance Services: A Vsm Based Case Study. 7th International Conference on Engineering, Project and Production Management. Vol. 182. Page: 665-672. [8] Bernabe, R. D., van Thiel, G. J., Raaijmakers, J. A., & van Delden, J. J. (2012). Decision theory and the evaluation of risks and benefits of clinical trials. Drug discovery today, 17(23-24), 1263-1269. [9] Karatas, M. (2017). Multiattribute Decision Making Using Multiperiod Probabilistic Weighted Fuzzy Axiomatic Design. Systems Engineering, 20(4), 318-334. [11] KeçekG., Yıldırım E. 2010. Kurumsal Kaynak Planlama (Erp) Sisteminin Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (Ahp) İle Seçimi: Otomotiv Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. Isparta. Vol. 15(1). Page: 193-211. [12] Başkaya Z., Akar C. 2005. Üretim Alternatifi Seçiminde Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci: Tekstil İşletmesi Örneği. Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. Bursa. Vol. 1. Page: 273-286. [13] Razi, N., & Karatas, M. (2016). A multi-objective model for locating search and rescue boats. European Journal of Operational Research, 254(1), 279-293. [14] Karacan, İ., Tozan, H., &Karataş, M. (2016). Multi Criteria Decision Methods in Health Technology Assessment: A Brief Literature Review. Eurasian Journal of Health Technology Assessment, 1(1), 12-19. [15] Göktolga Z.G., Gökalp B. 2012. İş Seçimini Etkileyen Kriterlerin Ve Alternatiflerin Ahp Metodu İle Belirlenmesi. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Muğla. Vol. 13(2). Page: 71-86. [19] Özdamar D. Y. 2004. Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci Yöntemi: Bir Satın Alma İhalesinde Uygulanması,Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Ankara. [16] Saaty T. L., Vargas, Luis G. 2001.
  2. Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of The Analytic HierarchyProces.Kluwer Academic Publishers, London. [17] Saaty T.L. 1994. Fundamentals of Decision Making And Priority Theory With The Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications. Pittsburgh PA. [18] Saaty T. L. 2008.