Dergiler / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2005 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Breech presentation in nulliparous women: An evaluation of 288 cases

Sayfa
14–16
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Excellent fetal-maternal outcomes in the nulliparous who had cesarean section for term singleton breech implies the importance of cesarean section as the preferred route of delivery.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the maternal risk factors of nulliparous women for breech presentation and outcomes of infants delivered by planned ceasarean section.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:STUDY DESIGN: The study group was comprised of 288 single breech presentation nulliparous women at term (>37 completed weeks of gestation) who delivered by planned cesarean section in the same institution.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Excellent fetal-maternal outcomes in the nulliparous who had cesarean section for term singleton breech implies the importance of cesarean section as the preferred route of delivery.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2000 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Makad prezentasyonu · Parite · Sezaryen

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the maternal risk factors of nulliparous women for breech presentation and outcomes of infants delivered by planned ceasarean section. STUDY DESIGN: The study group was comprised of 288 single breech presentation nulliparous women at term (>37 completed weeks of gestation) who delivered by planned cesarean section in the same institution. Demographic characteristics, gestational age, uterine anomalies, birth weights, Apgar scores and neonatal morbidity were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: All the patients in study were nulliparous. The mean of maternal age was 22 years (17-27) and time of delivery was 38.7 weeks (37-40.4). Uterine anomalies (uterine septum, uterus arcuatus etc.) were diagnosed in 15% (43) of patients (antenatally or during the cesarean section). Mean birth weight was 3350 mg (3100-4200). Fourteen infants weighed more than 4000 mg (4.8%) and 13 infants weighed between 2000-2500 mg (4.5%). No infant had a 5-minute apgar score of <7. No stillbirths or neonatal deaths were observed during the study period. CONCLUSION: Elective cesarean delivery of term infants of nulliparous women presenting in breech is not associated with worse neonatal outcomes. Uterine anomalies are important etiological factors for nulliparous breech presentation. Excellent fetal-maternal outcomes in the nulliparous who had cesarean section for term singleton breech implies the importance of cesarean section as the preferred route of delivery.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DİLBAZ, S., GELİŞEN, O., GÜVEN, G. E. S., DİLBAZ, B., TAN, O., KATAŞ, B. (2005). Breech presentation in nulliparous women: An evaluation of 288 cases. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 14–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/227578

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Hannah ME, Hannah WE, Hewson S A, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial, ifcncet 2000; 356:1375-83
  2. Lashen H, Fear K, Sturdee D. Trends in the management of the breech presentation at term; experience in a District General hospital over a 10-year period. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81:1116-22
  3. Krebs L, Langhoff-Roos J, Weber T. Breech at term- mode of delivery register-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995; 74:702-6
  4. Ktintzel W. Recommendations of FIGO Commitee on Perinatal Healthon guidelines for management of Breech delivery. Int Gynecol Obstet; 1994; 44:297-300
  5. Belfrage P, Gjessıng L. The term breech presentation. A retrospective study with regard to the planned mode of delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81:544-50
  6. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: External cephalic version. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.2000
  7. Golfier F, Vaudoyer F, Ecochard R, Champion F, Audra P, Raudrant D. Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001; 98:186-92
  8. Herbst A, Thorngren-Jerneck K. Mode of delivery in breech presentation at term: increased neonatal morbidity with vaginal delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001; 80:731-7
  9. Krebs L, Langhoff-Ross J. Elective Cesarean Delivery for Term Breech. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101:690-6
  10. Hemminki E, Merilainen J. Long Term effects of cesarean sections: Ectopic pregnancies and placental problems, Am J Obstet Gynecol 996; 174:1569-74
  11. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:3-8
  12. Young PF, Johanson RB. The management of breech presentation at term. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001:589-93.