KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2005 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Pregnancy satisfaction for antenatal care

Esra SAATÇİ
Volkan ARPACI
Nafiz BOZDEMİR
Güney ERGUN
ERSİN AKPINAR
Cüneyt EVRÜKE
Sayfa
17–22
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

CONCLUSION: Although there was not any significant difference between levels of care for antenatal care in terms of accessibility of either health care unit or personnel, we had higher scores in primary care which may be due to close relationship between care providers and women.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTİVE: To assess satisfaction of pregnant women for antenatal care and the difference between primary, secondary and tertiary care if there is any.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:STUDY DESİGN: A descriptive study was performed using a questionnaire to assess pregnancy satisfaction in 300 mothers who admitted to primary, secondary and tertiary care units in 1999.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:CONCLUSION: Although there was not any significant difference between levels of care for antenatal care in terms of accessibility of either health care unit or personnel, we had higher scores in primary care which may be due to close relationship between care providers and women.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anketler · Gebelik · Sağlık personelinin tutumu

Abstract

OBJECTİVE: To assess satisfaction of pregnant women for antenatal care and the difference between primary, secondary and tertiary care if there is any. STUDY DESİGN: A descriptive study was performed using a questionnaire to assess pregnancy satisfaction in 300 mothers who admitted to primary, secondary and tertiary care units in 1999. RESULTS: The mean age of 300 mothers was 26.3±5.4 years, 12.3% were illiterate, 85.0% were housewives and 72.3% had social security. Overall satisfaction rate of mothers from health care services was 66.3%. There was no significant difference between primary, secondary and tertiary care units in terms of pregnancy satisfaction (p>0.05). There was no significant difference for accessibility to health care unit and health care personnel between primary, secondary and tertiary care (p>0.05). There was significant difference in the physical conditions of the health care unit such as comfort, seats in the waiting room, design to contribute health education, overall convenience of the building (p=0.001, p=0.023, p=0.0001, p=0.031, respectively). There was significant difference in attitudes of health care personnel in kindness, intimacy, privacy, dealing with problems, competency, prescription, diet, physical exercise, and trust (p=0.005, p=0.006, p=0.028, p=0.001, p=0.018, p=0.005, p=0.048, p=0.052 and p=0.001, respectively) mostly in favour of primary and secondary care. CONCLUSION: Although there was not any significant difference between levels of care for antenatal care in terms of accessibility of either health care unit or personnel, we had higher scores in primary care which may be due to close relationship between care providers and women.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SAATÇİ, E., ARPACI, V., BOZDEMİR, N., ERGUN, G., AKPINAR, E., EVRÜKE, C. (2005). Pregnancy satisfaction for antenatal care. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 17–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/227560

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Meakin R and Weinman J. The Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS-21) adapted for British general practice. Family Practice 2002; 19:257-63
  2. Thorsen H, Witt K, Hollnagel H, Malterud K. The purpose of general practice consultation from the patient's perspective-theoretical aspects. Family Practice 2001; 18:638-43
  3. Goedhuys J, Rethans J J. On the relationship between the efficiency and the quality of the consultation a validity study. Family Practice 2001; 18:592-6
  4. Katie M, Budak A, Ivankovic D, Mastilica M, Lazic D, Banaszak BA, Matkovic V. Patients' views on the professional behaviour of family physicians. Family Practice 2001; 18:42-7
  5. WHO Regional Office for Europe: Health 21, The health for all policy framework for the WHO European Region, European Health For All Series no.6 Copenhagen: September 1998:125-30, 173-6
  6. Engiz O. Patient satisfaction in health care services, ac- cess from URL: http://www.merih.com/woguzen21.htm 16.08.2001 [in Turkish] 7. World Health Day, Safe motherhood, improve the quality of maternal health services (WHD) 98. 8), 7 April 1998,
  7. WHO/RHT/HRP/97.26: Monitoring reproductive health: selecting a short list of national and global indicators, 1997
  8. Pittrof R, Campbell O M R, Filippi VGA. What is quality in maternity care? an international perspective. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81:277-83
  9. Cook R J, Dickens B M, Wilson OAF, Scarrow S E. Advancing safe motherhood through human rights. WHO/RHR/01.5:3-8
  10. Kochenour K N. Normal Pregnancies and Prenatal Care. Danforth, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7. Edition, Istanbul: J B Lippincott Company & Yuce Publication, 1994: 67-96 [in Turkish]
  11. The Ministry of Health General Directorate of Mother and Child Health and Family Planning, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine Department of Public Health, AVSC International and Population Council. Turkey reproductive health services status analysis survey 1994. Publications of Ministry of Health, Turkey 1994 [in Turkish], 13. Weisman C S, Henderson J T. Managed care and women's health: access, preventive services, and satisfaction. Women's Health Issues 2001; 11:201-15
  12. Salganicoff A, Wyn R, Solis B. Medicaid managed care and low-income women: implications for access and satisfaction. Women's Health Issues 1998; 8:339-49
  13. Biderman A, Carmel S, Yeheskal A. Measuring patient satisfaction in primary care; a joint project of community representatives, clin