KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2

PRESERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ OPINIONS AND ETHICAL PERCEPTIONS IN RELATION TO

Hikmet SURMELI
Fatma SAHIN
Sayfa
76–86
Yayın Tarihi
2014-03-08
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition, their opinions and reasons related to the dilemmas were differentiated.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Öz Cloning is a reproductive method that raises many important ethical questions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Therefore preservice science teachers need have scientific literacy about cloning studies and also they need to be able to evaluate critically the potential benefits, risks and ethical implications of these technologies.Considering the importance of these issues, the aim of this study is to find preservice science teachers’ ethical peceptions and knowledge in relation to the application of cloning technologies. 112 preservice science teachers attended to this study, their perceptions and knowledge were assessed using dilemmas and questions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition, their opinions and reasons related to the dilemmas were differentiated.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anahtar Kelimeler Cloning technology · Preservice science teachers · Ethical concerns

Özet

Öz Cloning is a reproductive method that raises many important ethical questions. As our future science teachers, preservice science teachers will experience with cloning technologies in their lessons and also part of the society, many of them may become decision makers related these issues. Therefore preservice science teachers need have scientific literacy about cloning studies and also they need to be able to evaluate critically the potential benefits, risks and ethical implications of these technologies.Considering the importance of these issues, the aim of this study is to find preservice science teachers’ ethical peceptions and knowledge in relation to the application of cloning technologies. 112 preservice science teachers attended to this study, their perceptions and knowledge were assessed using dilemmas and questions. It was found that most of the preservice science teachers get their knowledge on cloning technology from informal resources, their knowledge were found limited and they found cloning as risky. In addition, their opinions and reasons related to the dilemmas were differentiated.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SURMELI, H., SAHIN, F. (2014). PRESERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ OPINIONS AND ETHICAL PERCEPTIONS IN RELATION TO. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2, 76–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/2240

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Arda, B. (2004) Ethical respects of biotechnology and the case of Turkey. Journal of Biotechnology and Law, 1, 210-214.
  2. Balas, A.K. & Hariharan, J. (1998). Cloning: What are their attitudes? A report on the general attitudes of a sample of Midwestern Citizens. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST). San Diego, CA. Beauchamp, T.L., Kahn, J.P. (2008). Ethical theory and bioethics. In T.L.Beauchamp, L.Walters, J.P. Kahn, A.C. Mastroianni (Ed), Contemporary issues in bioethics (pp.1-32).Thomson Wadsworth Seventh edition. Cajas, F. (1999). Public understanding of science: using technology to enhance school science in everyday life. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 765-773.
  3. Chabalengula, V.M., Mumba, F., Chitiyo, J. (2011). Elementary education preservice teachers’ understanding of biotechnology and its related processes. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 39(4), 321-325.
  4. Concannon, J.P., Siegel, M.A., Halverson, K., Freyermuth, S. (2010). College students’ conceptions of stem cell research and cloning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(2), 177-186.
  5. Costa, E.F., Dınız, N. M., Siqueira, J.E. (2006). The cloning of human beings: Ethical and legal issues. Journal of Medical Ethics, 14, 72-76.
  6. Dawson, V. (2001) Addressing controversial issues in secondary school science. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 47(4), 38-44.
  7. Dawson, V. (2007). An exploration of high school (12-17 year old) students’ understanding of, and attitudes toward biotechnology process. Research in Science Education, 37(1), 59-73.
  8. Dawson, V., Taylor, P. (2000). Do adolescents' bioethical decisions differ from those of experts? Journal of Biological Education 34(4): 184-188.
  9. Dawson, V. & Taylor, P. (1997) The inclusion of bioethics education in biotechnology courses. Eubious Journal of Asian and International Bioethics, 7, 171-175
  10. Dawson, V., Schibeci, R. (2003). Western Australian high school students' attitudes towards biotechnology process. Journal of Biological Education, 38(1): 7-12.
  11. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
  12. Dybas, C. L. (2003). Bioethics in a changing world: Report from AIBS's 54th Annual Meeting. Bioscience 53(9): 798-802.
  13. Gunter, B., Kinderlerer, J., Beyleveld, D. (1998). Teenagers and biotechnology: A survey of understanding and opinion in Britain. Studies in Sc