KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2006 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

GC-MS Analysis and Antibacterial Activity of Cultivated Satureja cuneifolia Ten. Essential Oil

Yüksel KAN
Uçkun Sait UÇAN
Sayfa
253–259
Yayın Tarihi
2006-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The antibacterial activity of the essential oil of S. cuneifolia and its components was determined by a semiquantative disc-diffusion method, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined based on a micro-well dilution method against strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus, Sarcina lutea, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus}.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The composition of the essential oil of Satureja cuneifolia Ten. cultivated in Konya, Turkey, was investigated by capillary GC-MS.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Carvacrol was the dominant component, comprising 59.28% of the essential oil.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The antibacterial activity of the essential oil of S. cuneifolia and its components was determined by a semiquantative disc-diffusion method, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined based on a micro-well dilution method against strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus, Sarcina lutea, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus}.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Satureja cuneifolia · Lamiaceae · Essential oil

Özet

The composition of the essential oil of Satureja cuneifolia Ten. cultivated in Konya, Turkey, was investigated by capillary GC-MS. The compounds were characterized by comparison with library searches. Six main compounds were identified. Carvacrol was the dominant component, comprising 59.28% of the essential oil. The oil also contained 15.72% thymol, 9.69% p-cymene, 4.16% g -terpinene, 1.70% linalool and 1.25% borneol. The antibacterial activity of the essential oil of S. cuneifolia and its components was determined by a semiquantative disc-diffusion method, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined based on a micro-well dilution method against strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus, Sarcina lutea, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus}.

Abstract

The composition of the essential oil of Satureja cuneifolia Ten. cultivated in Konya, Turkey, was investigated by capillary GC-MS. The compounds were characterized by comparison with library searches. Six main compounds were identified. Carvacrol was the dominant component, comprising 59.28% of the essential oil. The oil also contained 15.72% thymol, 9.69% p-cymene, 4.16% g -terpinene, 1.70% linalool and 1.25% borneol. The antibacterial activity of the essential oil of S. cuneifolia and its components was determined by a semiquantative disc-diffusion method, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined based on a micro-well dilution method against strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus, Sarcina lutea, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus}.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAN, Y., UÇAN, U. S. (2006). GC-MS Analysis and Antibacterial Activity of Cultivated Satureja cuneifolia Ten. Essential Oil. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 253–259. https://ajindex.com/articles/220579

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. T. Baytop, “Therapy with Medicinal Plants in Turkey”, p. 332, Nobel Tıp Kitabevi, ˙Istanbul, 1999. G. T¨umen, N. Kırımer, N. Ermi n and K.H.C. Ba¸ser, Planta Med., 64, 81-83 (1998).
  2. V. Slavkovska, R. Jancic, S. Bojovic, S. Milosavljevic and D. Djokovic, Phytochemistry 57, 71-76 (2001).
  3. D. Azaz, F. Demirci, F. Satıl, M. K¨urk¸c¨uo˘glu and K.H.C. Ba¸ser, Z. Naturforsch 57c, 817-21 (2002). M. K¨urk¸c¨uo˘glu, G. T¨umen and K.H.C. Ba¸ser, Chemistry of Natural Compounds 37, 329-31 (2001).
  4. H. Baydar, O. Sa˘gdi¸c, G. ¨Ozkan and T. Karado˘gan, Food Control 15, 169-72 (2004). S.M. Finegold and H.J. Martin, “Diagnostic Microbiology”, 6thed., pp. 532-557,
  5. C.V. Mosby Company, London, 1982. F. S¸ahin, ˙I. Karaman, M. G¨ull¨uce, H. ¨O˘g¨ut¸c¨u, M. S¸eng¨ul, A. Adıg¨uzel, S. ¨Ozt¨urk and R. Kotan, Journal of Ethnopharmacology 87, 61-65 (2003).
  6. N. Chorianopoulos, E. Kalpoutzakis, N. Aligiannis, S. Mitaku, G.J. Nychas and S.A. Haroutounian, J. Agric. Food Chem. 52, 8261-67 (2004). G. T¨umen, K.H.C. Ba¸ser, B. Demirci and N. Ermin, Flavour and Fragrance Journal 13, 65-67 (1998). A.C. G¨oren, G. Topcu, G. Bi lsel, M. Bi lsel and J.M. Wi lki nson, Natural Product Research 18, 189-95 (2004). M. G¨ull¨uce, M. S¨okmen, D. Daferera, G. Agar, H. ¨Ozkan, N. Kartal, N. Polssi ou, A. S¨okmen and F. S¸ahin, J. Agric. Food Chem. 51, 3958-65 (2003).
  7. A.D. Azaz, M. K¨urk¸c¨uo˘glu, F. Satıl, K.H.C. Baser and G. T¨umen, Flavour and Fragrance Journal 20, 91 (2005).
  8. M. Milos, A. Radonic, N. Bezic and V. Dunkic, Flavour and Fragrance Journal 16, 157-60 (2001).
  9. O. Tzakou and H. Skaltsa, Planta Med. 69, 282-84 (2003).
  10. A. Ultee and E.J. Smid, Int. J. Food Microbiol. 64, 373-78 (2001).
  11. A. Lopez-Malo, S.M. Alzamora and E. Palou, Int. J. Food Microbiol. 73, 213-18 (2002).
  12. M. Sokovic, O. Tzakou, D. Pitarokili and M. Couladis, Nahrung. 46, 317-20 (2002).
  13. C.F. Bagamboula, M. Uyttendaele and J. Debevere, Food Microbiol. 21, 33-42 (2004).
  14. P.M. Periago and R. Moezelaar, Int. J. Food Microbiol. 68, 141-48 (2001).