Dergiler / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2021 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

POSSIBILITY OF COMBINING HIGH YIELD AND RESISTANCE TO FUSARIUM WILT DISEASE USING MOLECULAR MARKERS IN 4 ÉLITE SESAME LINES

Sayfa
129–138
Yayın Tarihi
2021-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Finally, both C1.6 and C3.8 offering prospects to form new varieties sesame having high-yield and Fusarium wilt disease resistance.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Developing a high yielding variety connected with stress-resistant in sesame is a viable option to address the adverse effects of climate change.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The objectives of this study were to identify high-yielding and to detect some molecular markers associated with Fusarium wilt resistance in sesame.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Finally, both C1.6 and C3.8 offering prospects to form new varieties sesame having high-yield and Fusarium wilt disease resistance.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016-2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Climatic change · Fusarium wilt · molecular marker

Abstract

Developing a high yielding variety connected with stress-resistant in sesame is a viable option to address the adverse effects of climate change. The objectives of this study were to identify high-yielding and to detect some molecular markers associated with Fusarium wilt resistance in sesame. Five genotypes were evaluated based on seed yield ha-1 over three growing seasons (2016-2018) at two sites, Al-Nubaria (2016-2018) and Abu- Hammad (2016) in Egypt. Twenty RAPD and five ISSR primers used to detect some markers linked to Fusarium wilt resistance. Genotypes and environments and interaction between them showed high significant variation (p<0.05) for seed yield ha-1. The mean performance of the lines C1.5, C3.8, C6.3, and C1.6, for seed yield ha-1 were higher than check variety by 3.4, 2.8, 0.5 and, 16.7%. Line C1.6 achieved less value of the standard deviation of ranks, based on seed yield ha-1, through environments, indicating that it was less affected by environmental conditions. Molecular marker analysis revealed eight markers linked to Fusarium wilt resistance, they are seven positive markers (five RAPD and two ISSR) which were found in the line C3.8 and absent in the check variety. Finally, both C1.6 and C3.8 offering prospects to form new varieties sesame having high-yield and Fusarium wilt disease resistance.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ANTER, A. S., GHADA, S. M. (2021). POSSIBILITY OF COMBINING HIGH YIELD AND RESISTANCE TO FUSARIUM WILT DISEASE USING MOLECULAR MARKERS IN 4 ÉLITE SESAME LINES. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 129–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/220522

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Admas, A., P. Yohannes and K. Tesfaye. 2013. Genetic distance of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) varietys and varieties from Northwestern Ethiopia using inter simple sequence repeat markers. East Afric. J. Sci. 7:31-40.
  2. Ahmad, F., A. Akram, K. Farman, T. Abbas, A. Bibi, S. Khalid, and M. Waseem. 2017. Molecular markers and marker-assisted plant breeding: Current status and their applications in agricultural development. J. of Envi. and Agric. Sci. 11: 35-50.
  3. Ahmed, M. B. S.and F. A. Ahmed. 2012. Genotype × season interaction and characters association of some sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) genotypes under rainfed conditions of Sudan,” Afric. J. Plant Sci. 6:39–42.
  4. Anilakumar, R. K., A. Pal, F. Khanum and S. A. Bawa. 2010. Nutritional, medicinal and industrial uses of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) seeds.Agric. Consp. Sci. Cus. 75:159-168.
  5. Anitha, B.K., N. Manivannan, P. Vindhiyavarman, C. Gopalakrishnan and K. Ganesamurthy. 2010. Molecular diversity among sesame varieties of Tamil Nadu. J. Plant Breed. 1: 447- 452. Anter, A.S. and A.A. Ashraf. 2014. Evaluation performance of new sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) lines under normal and drought conditions. Mid. East J. Agric. Res. 7:1411-1418.
  6. Baraki, F. and M. Berhe. 2019. Evaluating performance of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) genotypes in different growing seasons in Northern Ethiopia. Inte. J. Agro. 1-7.
  7. Beckman, G.H. 2000. Phenolic-storing cells: keys to programmed cell death and periderm formation in wilt disease resistance and in general defense responses in plants? Physiological and Mole. Plant Patho. 57:101–110.
  8. Bennett, R.N. and R.M. Wallsgrove. 1994. Secondary metabolites in plant defence mechanisms. New Phy. 127:617–633.
  9. Boureima, S. and A. Yaou. 2019. Genotype by yield × trait combination biplot approach to evaluate sesame genotypes on multiple traits basis. Turkish Journal of Field Crops.24:237-244.
  10. Boureima, S., M. Eyletters, M. Diouf, T.A. Diop and P. Van Damme. 2011. Sensitivity of seed germination and seedling radicle growth to drought stress in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Res. J. Envir. Sci. 5:557–564.
  11. Cobb, N. J., R.U. Juma, P. S.Biswas, J.D. Arbelaez, J. Rutkoski, G. Atlin, T. Hagen, M. Quinn and E. H. Ng. 2019. Enhancing the rate of genetic gain in public-sector plant breeding programs: lessons from the breeder’s equation. Theor. Appl. Gene. 132: 627–645.
  12. Dar, A.A., S. Mudigunda, P.K. Mittal and N. Arumugam. 2017. Comparative assessment of genetic diversity in Sesamum indicum L. using RAPD and SSR marke