Dergiler / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Interpreting a Radical Prostatectomy Report

Radikal Prostatektomi Raporunun Yorumlanması

Sayfa
168–171
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Also determining tumor burden and to interpret all surgical margins total sampling of the material is essential.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Worldwide, clinically detected prostate cancer is the second most common malignancy, with an estimated 1.1 million new cases in 2012.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Also active surveillance is a management strategy to avoid or delay the potential harms caused by radical treatments.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Also determining tumor burden and to interpret all surgical margins total sampling of the material is essential.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Worldwide, clinically detected prostate cancer is the second most common malignancy, with an estimated 1.1 million new cases in 2012. Standard active treatments for prostate cancer include radiotherapy and/or radical prostatectomy (RP) (for clinically localized prostate cancer). Also active surveillance is a management strategy to avoid or delay the potential harms caused by radical treatments. At this point, a pathology report plays a major role. Appropriate handling and systematic examination of a RP specimen is essential for the identification of tumor characteristics such as grade, volume, pathological stage, and surgical margin status. Although some minor differences in macroscobic evaluation may be seen among authors, it is essential to paint and sample the entire prostatectomy specimen. Most prostate tumors are heterogeneous and multifocal compared to tumors of other organs. This makes macroscopic assessment of prostatectomy specimen challenging and sampling of a representative material from the main tumor focus difficult. Also determining tumor burden and to interpret all surgical margins total sampling of the material is essential.

Abstract

Dünyada, klinik olarak tespit edilen prostat kanseri, 2012’de tahmin edilen 1,1 milyon yeni olguyla en sık görülen ikinci malignitedir. Prostat kanseri için standart aktif tedaviler arasında radyoterapi ve/veya radikal prostatektomi (klinik olarak lokalize prostat kanseri için) bulunur. Ayrıca aktif izlem, diğer tedavilerin neden olduğu olası zararları önlemek veya geciktirmek için uygun hastalarda alternatif bir tedavi yöntemidir. Bu noktada patoloji raporu önemli rol oynar. Radikal prostatektomi materyalinin uygun makroskobik incelemesi ve örneklenmesi son derece önemlidir. Otörler arasında bazı küçük farklılıklar görünse de, prostatektomi materyalini boyamak ve total örneklemek gerekir. Ayrıca tümör yükünün belirlenmesi ve tüm cerrahi sınırların yorumlanabilmesi için totale yakın örnekleme önemlidir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARABULUT, Y. Y. (2019). Interpreting a Radical Prostatectomy Report. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 168–171. https://ajindex.com/articles/219834

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Moch H, Humphrey PA, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2016
  2. Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, Gershenwald JE, Compton CC, Hess KR, Sullivan DC, Jessup JM, Brierley JD, Gaspar LE, Schilsky RL, Balch CM, Winchester DP, Asare EA, Madera M, Gres, DM, Meyer LR. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. Ed. 8 Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017
  3. Karabulut YY. Summary of the Changes in the 8th Edition of the TumorNode- Metastasis Staging of Urological and Male Genital Organs Cancers. Journal of Urological Surgery 2018;5(2):133-139
  4. Egevad L, Srigley JR and Delahunt B. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: rationale and organization. Modern Pathology (2011) 24,1-5
  5. Srigley JR, Amin MB, Epstein JI, et al. Updated protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinomas of the prostate gland. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:936-946
  6. Srigley JR. Key issues in handling and reporting radical prostatectomy specimens. Arch Pathol Lab. Med 2006;130:303-317
  7. Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, Andrew J Evans, Brett Delahunt, Jonathan I Epstein at al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease. Modern Pathology (2011) 24,26-38
  8. Ekici S, Ayhan A, Erkan I, et al. The role of the pathologist in the evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2003;37:387- 391
  9. Villers A, McNeal JE, Redwine EA, et al. The role of perineural space invasion in the local spread of prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Urol 1989;142:763-768
  10. Galluzzi M, Evans AJ, Delahunt B, Epstein JI, Griffiths DF, Kwast T, Montironi R, Thomas M, Srigley J, Egevad L, Humphrey P; The ISUP Prostate Cancer Group. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease. Modern Pathology (2011) 24,26-38
  11. Epstein JI, Carmichael MJ, Pizov G, et al. Influence of capsular penetration on progression following radical prostatectomy: a study of 196 cases with long-term follow-up. J Urol 1993;150:135-141
  12. Wheeler