KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Physics Education: Systematic Mapping of Educational Innovation Articles

Esmeralda CAMPOS
Itzel H. ARMENTA
Pablo BARNIOL
Blanca RUIZ
Sayfa
315–331
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The mapping provides information that supports researchers, professors and managers interested in educational innovation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This article presents a systematic mapping review on educational innovation in the area of physics education.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We identified 508 articles published in journals from 2015 to 2019 from the Web of Science and Scopus databases.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The mapping provides information that supports researchers, professors and managers interested in educational innovation.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This article presents a systematic mapping review on educational innovation in the area of physics education. We identified 508 articles published in journals from 2015 to 2019 from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. We found that research in educational innovation in the teaching of physics has focused on the analysis of didactic proposals and their evaluation. The analysis reveals areas of opportunity for the area of educational management, where we found some of the most cited articles, as well as for the study of innovative extracurricular activities related to the teaching of physics. There is an inconsistency between the large proportion of articles focused on teacher education and the absence of this kind of study at the basic levels. In general, the study of educational innovation in physics takes place at the high-school and university levels. The mapping provides information that supports researchers, professors and managers interested in educational innovation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CAMPOS, E., ARMENTA, I. H., BARNIOL, P., RUIZ, B. (2020). Physics Education: Systematic Mapping of Educational Innovation Articles. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 315–331. https://ajindex.com/articles/219047

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Akdemir, O. (2015). Using interactive course modules to improve students' understanding of electric circuits. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(4), 1117-1125.
  2. Albadi, N. M., O’Toole, J. M., & Harkins, J. (2017). A preliminary study of the technical use of arabic in saudi secondary physics classes. Issues in Educational Research, 27(4), 639-657.
  3. Alias, N., Dewitt, D., Siraj, S., Rahman, M. N. A., Gelamdin, R. B., & Rauf, R. A. A. (2015). The effectiveness of physics PTechLS module in a rural secondary school in Malaysia. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2015, 537-542.
  4. Alizoti, A., Vila, F., Mulaj, Z., & Dhoqina, P. (2016). Physics subject matter in secondary education. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 17(1), 387-393.
  5. Anderson, K. A., Crespi, M., & Sayre, E. C. (2017). Linking behavior in the physics education research coauthorship network. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010121, doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010121 Battista, G., Carnielo, E., Evangelisti, L., Frascarolo, M., & Vollaro, R. D. L. (2015). Energy performance and thermal comfort of a high efficiency house: RhOME for denCity, winner of Solar Decathlon Europe 2014. Sustainability, 7(7), 9681-9695.
  6. Baxter, P., Ashurst, E., Read, R., Kennedy, J., & Belpaeme, T. (2017). Robot education peers in a situated primary school study: Personalisation promotes child learning. PloS one, 12(5). Beichner, R. J. (2009). An introduction to physics education research. Getting started in Per, 2(1), 1-25.
  7. Berg, R. E. (2012). Resource Letter PhD-2: Physics Demonstrations. American Journal of Physics, 80(3), 181-191.
  8. Cai, S., Chiang, F. K., Sun, Y., Lin, C., & Lee, J. J. (2017). Applications of augmented reality-based natural interactive learning in magnetic field instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), 778-791. Calderón, A., & Ruiz, M. (2015). A systematic literature review on serious games evaluation: An application to software project management. Computers & Education, 87, 396-422.
  9. Cameron, D., & Grant, A. (2017). The role of mentoring in early career physics teachers’ professional identity construction. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 6(2), 128-142. doi:10.1108/IJMCE-01-2017-0003
  10. Cao, Y., & Brizuela, B. M. (2016). High school students' representations and understandings of electric fields. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020102, doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020102 Cardona, M.