Dergiler / Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

PROBING THE FEASIBILITY OF THE INDIGENISATION OF NIGERIAN MEDIA IN AN ERA OF CULTURAL GLOBALISATION: A STUDY OF NIGERIAN RADIO AND TV PRODUCERS

Sayfa
8–20
Yayın Tarihi
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It really overlooks the fact that Nigerian audiences have progressively become Westernised and logic will want media producers to pragmatically go for western or westernised media programs, so as to stay afloat.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The myth of media imperialism (presumably engendered by the globalisation current) has motivated most less developed countries to adopt customised media policies geared towards cultural protectionism.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This policy which strongly urges endogenous broadcasters to thrive to attain a 100 percent local content has variously been assessedby media practitioners and ideologues.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It really overlooks the fact that Nigerian audiences have progressively become Westernised and logic will want media producers to pragmatically go for western or westernised media programs, so as to stay afloat.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Cultural Protectionism · Cultural Globalisation · Local Content Regulation

Özet

The myth of media imperialism (presumably engendered by the globalisation current) has motivated most less developed countries to adopt customised media policies geared towards cultural protectionism. In line with this protectionist movement, Nigeria has adopted a local content policy which, over the years, has militated for a national media output which is dominantly shaped according to its local cultural specificities. This policy which strongly urges endogenous broadcasters to thrive to attain a 100 percent local content has variously been assessedby media practitioners and ideologues. Using secondary sources and critical observations, this paper argues that, although laudable, the idea of resorting to local content regulation for cultural protection in the Nigerian media sphere has been poorly conceived. Government has so far failed to provide all the accompanying measures to secure the success of this policy. As conceived by Nigeria, the policy does not provide a comprehensive and clear cut definition of local program and Nigerianess. Also, the policy’s insistence on a 70-100 percent isutopian. It really overlooks the fact that Nigerian audiences have progressively become Westernised and logic will want media producers to pragmatically go for western or westernised media programs, so as to stay afloat.

Abstract

The myth of media imperialism (presumably engendered by the globalisation current) has motivated most less developed countries to adopt customised media policies geared towards cultural protectionism. In line with this protectionist movement, Nigeria has adopted a local content policy which, over the years, has militated for a national media output which is dominantly shaped according to its local cultural specificities. This policy which strongly urges endogenous broadcasters to thrive to attain a 100 percent local content has variously been assessed by media practitioners and ideologues. Using secondary sources and critical observations, this paper argues that, although laudable, the idea of resorting to local content regulation for cultural protection in the Nigerian media sphere has been poorly conceived. Government has so far failed to provide all the accompanying measures to secure the success of this policy. As conceived by Nigeria, the policy does not provide a comprehensive and clear cut definition of local program and Nigerianess. Also, the policy’s insistence on a 70-100 percent is utopian. It really overlooks the fact that Nigerian audiences have progressively become Westernised and logic will want media producers to pragmatically go for western or westernised media programs, so as to stay afloat.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ENDONG, F. P. C. (2021). PROBING THE FEASIBILITY OF THE INDIGENISATION OF NIGERIAN MEDIA IN AN ERA OF CULTURAL GLOBALISATION: A STUDY OF NIGERIAN RADIO AND TV PRODUCERS. Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 8–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/218992

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Aliagan, A.R. (2017). Kawu: Changing the narrative in Nigeria’s broadcasting industry. Time Nigeria Magazine, Retrieved May 9th, 2018 from http://timenigeria.com/kawu-changing-the-narrative-in-nigerias-broadcasting-industry/ (Accessed 9, 2018).
  2. Bobda, A.S. (2000). The uniqueness of Ghanaian English pronunciation in West Africa. Studies in the Linguistic Science. 30(2): 185-198. Centre for International Governance Innovation. 2014. The internationalisation of indigenous rights: UNDRIP in Canadian context. Special report. Waterloo: CIGI. Effiom, V. E. (2005). Electronic media management in a developing democracy. Calabar: Balynhen Nigeria Limited. Ekpang, E. J. (2008). Globalization and cultural imperialism: The Nigerian experience. West African Association for Commonwealth Literature and Language Studies 2(2):1-17.
  3. Endong F. P. (2014). Westernisation of audiences as a threat to the indigenisation of media broadcast in Nigeria. In JMC: Journal of Media and Communication Studies 6(8): 121-129.
  4. Endong, F.P.C. (2015). Indigenisation of media in Nigerian and cultural globalisation: Mutual bedfellows or implacable foes? Journal of Globalization Studies 6(2): 106-118.
  5. Endong, F.P.C. (2018). Culture and heritage preservation in an era of globalization and modernism. A comparative study of China and Nigeria. In Handbook of research on heritage management and preservation, ed. Patrick Ngulube, pp.320-339. Hersey: IGI Global. Forbes. (2017). Globalisation. https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2017/08/28/is-globalization-creating-a-single-world-culture/#c0a417a3bd36 (Accessed 7 April, 2018).
  6. Grawhall, N. (2006). MDGs, globalisation and indigenous people in Africa. Indigenous Affairs 1(6): 6-13.
  7. Huntington, S, (1993). "The clash of civilizations". Foreign Affairs. 72 (3): 22–49.
  8. Koblowe, O. & Madu, O. (2012). “Programming content of Nigerian broadcast media: Towards an indigenizing paradigm” in Estudos em comunicacao 1(8): 75-91.
  9. Leornard, C. (2016). Local content quotas on TV are global – but they just don’t work everywhere. The Conversation https://theconversation.com/local-content-quotas-on-tv-are-global-they-just-dont-work-everywhere-60656 (Accessed May 9th, 018). McWhorter, J. (2014). The “ax” versus the “ask” question. Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/2014/jan/19/opinion/la-oe-mcwhorter-black-speech-ax-20140119. (Accessed June 3rd, 2018).
  10. Nigerian Broadcasting Commission. (2016). The Nigerian Broadcasting Code (6th edition), Abuja: Nigerian Broadcastin