Effect of Mg doping on morphology, photocatalytic activity and related biological properties of Zn1-xMgxO nanoparticles

Moreover, the XRD results indicated that the patterns of Mg doped ZnO nanoparticles related to ZnO hexagonal wurtzite structure had no secondary phase for x

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯

Amaç & Hipotez:The objective of this study is to synthesize ZnO and Mg doped ZnO (Zn1-xMgxO) nanoparticles via the sol-gel method, and characterize their structures and to investigate their biological properties such as antibacterial activity and hemolytic potential.Nanoparticles (NPs) were synthesized by the sol-gel method using zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(CH3COO)(2) .2H(2)O) and magnesium acetate tetrahydrate (Mg(CH3COO)(2) .4H(2)O) as precursors.

📊

Temel Bulgular & Veri:Structural and morphological characterizations of Zn1-xMgxO nanoparticles were studied by using XRD and SEM-EDX, respectively.

💡

Sonuç & Katkı:Moreover, the XRD results indicated that the patterns of Mg doped ZnO nanoparticles related to ZnO hexagonal wurtzite structure had no secondary phase for x

🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi

📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem

⚙️Değişkenler:Sol-gel method · Mg doped ZnO · hemolytic activity

Abstract

The objective of this study is to synthesize ZnO and Mg doped ZnO (Zn1-xMgxO) nanoparticles via the sol-gel method, and characterize their structures and to investigate their biological properties such as antibacterial activity and hemolytic potential.Nanoparticles (NPs) were synthesized by the sol-gel method using zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(CH3COO)(2) .2H(2)O) and magnesium acetate tetrahydrate (Mg(CH3COO)(2) .4H(2)O) as precursors. Methanol and monoethanolamine were used as solvent and sol stabilizer, respectively. Structural and morphological characterizations of Zn1-xMgxO nanoparticles were studied by using XRD and SEM-EDX, respectively. Photocatalytic activities of ZnO and selected Mg-doped ZnO (Zn1-xMgxO) nanoparticles were investigated by degradation of methylene blue (MeB). Results indicated that Mg doping (both 10% and 30%) to the ZnO nanoparticles enhanced the photocatalytic activity and a little amount of Zn0.90Mg0.10O photocatalyst (1.0 mg/mL) degraded MeB with 99% efficiency after 24 h of irradiation under ambient visible light. Antibacterial activity of nanoparticles versus Escherichia coli (E. coli) was determined by the standard plate count method. Hemolytic activities of the NPs were studied by hemolysis tests using human erythrocytes. XRD data proved that the average particle size of nanoparticles was around 30 nm. Moreover, the XRD results indicated that the patterns of Mg doped ZnO nanoparticles related to ZnO hexagonal wurtzite structure had no secondary phase for x

Anahtar kelimeler

Sol-gel method Mg doped ZnO hemolytic activity antibacterial properties E. coli

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YALCİN, B., AKCAN, D., YALCİN, I. E., ALPHAN, M. C., SENTURK, K., OZYİGİT, I. I., ARDA, L. (2020). Effect of Mg doping on morphology, photocatalytic activity and related biological properties of Zn1-xMgxO nanoparticles. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4, 1177–1199. https://ajindex.com/articles/217971

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

Yeni Sekmede Aç ↗

↗Yeni Sekme

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

AGREN MS, 1991, J SURG RES, V50, P101, DOI 10.1016/0022-4804(91)90230-J Ali W, 2018, MATER CHEM PHYS, V213, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.04.015 Asikuzun E, 2017, J MATER SCI-MATER EL, V28, P14314, DOI 10.1007/s10854-017-7291-x Auger S, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-30719-9 Bazazi S, 2018, J IND ENG CHEM, V62, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.01.004 Bisht G., 2015,
NANOBIOMEDICINE, V3, P1. Bomila R, 2019, J MATER SCI-MATER EL, V30, P582, DOI 10.1007/s10854-018-0324-2 Boyraz C, 2017, CERAM INT, V43, P15986, DOI 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.184 Brayner R, 2006, NANO LETT, V6, P866, DOI 10.1021/nl052326h Byamba D, 2010, ANN DERMATOL, V22, P269, DOI 10.5021/ad.2010.22.3.269 Chiari-Andreo BG, 2020, CURR NANOSCI, V16, P3, DOI 10.2174/1573413715660190618102321 Chmielnicka J, 1996, ECOTOX ENVIRON SAFE, V35, P277, DOI 10.1006/eesa.1996.0111 Cho WS, 2011, PART FIBRE TOXICOL, V8, DOI 10.1186/1743-8977-8-27 Claros M, 2020, NANOMATERIALS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/nano10030471 Colvin RA, 2010,
METALLOMICS, V2, P306, DOI 10.1039/b926662c Darroudi M, 2014, CERAM INT, V40, P2041, DOI 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.07.116 Darroudi M, 2012, MATER LETT, V66, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.08.016 Darroudi M, 2011, INT J MOL SCI, V12, P6346, DOI 10.3390/ijms12096346 Dawlee S, 2005,
BIOMACROMOLECULES, V6, P2040, DOI 10.1021/bm050013a Dogan N, 2015, J MAGN MAGN MATER, V373, P226, DOI 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.03.053 Edalati K, 2016, MATER RES BULL, V74, P374, DOI 10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.11.001 Eriksson J, 2009, SENSOR ACTUAT B-CHEM, V137, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.snb.2008.10.072 Eskizeybek V, 2012, APPL CATAL B-ENVIRON, V119, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.02.034 Fielding G, 2013, ACTA BIOMATER, V9, P9137, DOI 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.009 Fu GF, 2005, J PHYS CHEM B, V109, P8889, DOI 10.1021/jp0502196 Fujihara J, 2015, J MED INVESTIG, V62, P45, DOI 10.2152/jmi.62.45 Gordon T, 2011, COLLOID SURFACE A, V374, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.10.015 Guler A, 2019, CERAM INT, V45, P1737, DOI 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.056 Hu CH, 2006, APPL CLAY SCI, V31, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.clay.2005.10.010 Iqbal G, 2019, J PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO B, V192, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.01.021 Iqbal J, 2014, CERAM INT, V40, P7487, DOI 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.12.099 Jalal R, 2010, MATER CHEM PHYS, V121, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.01.020 Jonca J, 2014, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V87, P907, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.302 Kasemets K, 2009, TOXICOL IN VITRO, V23, P1116, DOI 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.05.015 Kas