Dergiler / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship Between Tourism Income and Financial Development in The Mena Countries

Sayfa
1183–1190
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

On the other hand for the frequency domain test it is offered that the neutrality approach was valid in 2009 and 2016 and demand driven approach is valid in 2005-2013 (except 2009).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose – The purpose of this study is to determine the causality between financial development and tourism income for the MENA economies between year 1995 and 2016.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Design/Methodology/Approach – To do this, we employ Dimitrescu and Hurlin (2012) panel causality test depending on rolling window regression and Emirmahmutoğlu and Köse’s (2011) panel causality test.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:On the other hand for the frequency domain test it is offered that the neutrality approach was valid in 2009 and 2016 and demand driven approach is valid in 2005-2013 (except 2009).
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to determine the causality between financial development and tourism income for the MENA economies between year 1995 and 2016. Design/Methodology/Approach – To do this, we employ Dimitrescu and Hurlin (2012) panel causality test depending on rolling window regression and Emirmahmutoğlu and Köse’s (2011) panel causality test. Findings – In this analysis for Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Arab Rep., Iran, Islamic Rep., Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Sudan, Tunisia and Turkish economies the relationship between financial development and tourism income calculated by the IMF for the period of 1995-2016. Panel data analysis is employed in order to test the hypothesis. In the empirical analysis, it was concluded that the countries that formed the panel affected each other socially and economically. Discussion – According to the results of empirical analysis, when the relationship between financial development and tourism income is examined for each country forming the panel, it was found that the supply - driven approach in Jordan and Tunisia on the other hand in Morocco and Sudan demand driven approach is valid. On the other hand for the frequency domain test it is offered that the neutrality approach was valid in 2009 and 2016 and demand driven approach is valid in 2005-2013 (except 2009).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YENİŞEHİRLİOĞLU, E., BAYAT, T. (2019). The Relationship Between Tourism Income and Financial Development in The Mena Countries. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 1183–1190. https://ajindex.com/articles/217695

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Balaguer, J., & Cantavella-Jorda, M. (2002). Tourism as a long-run economic growth factor: the Spanish case. Applied economics, 34(7), 877-884.
  2. Breusch, T., Pagan, A., 1980. The Lagrange multiplier test and its application to model specification in econometrics. Rev. Econ. Stud. 47, 239–253.
  3. Demetrıades P. O., H. A. Khaled (1996), “Does Financial Development Cause Economic Growth? Time Series Evidence From 16 Countries”, Journal Of Development Economics, 51(2), 1996, 387-411
  4. Demetriades, P. O., & Hussein, K. A. (1996). Does financial development cause economic growth? Time-series evidence from 16 countries. Journal of development Economics, 51(2), 387-411.
  5. Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
  6. Durbarry, R. (2004). Tourism and economic growth: the case of Mauritius. Tourism Economics, 10(4), 389-401.
  7. Emirmahmutoğlu, F. And Kose, N. (2011), “Testing for Granger Causality in Heterogeneous Mixed Panels”, Economic Modelling, 28, 870–876.
  8. Fayissa, B., Nsiah, C. and Tadasse, B. (2008) ‘Impact of tourism on economic growth and development in Africa’, Tourism Economics, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp.807–818.
  9. Frechtling, D. C., & Horvath, E. (1999). Estimating the multiplier effects of tourism expenditures on a local economy through a regional input-output model. Journal of travel research, 37(4), 324-332.
  10. Gregorio, J., & Guidotti, P. E. (1995). Financial development and economic growth. World development, 23(3), 433-448.
  11. Hassan, M. K., Sanchez, B., & Yu, J. S. (2011). Financial development and economic growth: New evidence from panel data. The Quarterly Review of economics and finance, 51(1), 88-104.
  12. Henderson, J. C. (1999). Asian tourism and the financial Indonesia and Thailand compared. Current Issues in Tourism, 2, 294-303.
  13. Holzner, M. (2011) ‘Tourism and economic development: the beach disease?’ Tourism Management, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp.922–933.
  14. Khan, M. (2016). Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030. Defence Journal, 119, 36-42.
  15. Khan, M. and Senhadji, A. (2003) ‘Financial development and economic growth: a review and new evidence’, Journal of African Economies, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp.89–110.
  16. Kumar, R. R., & Kumar, R. (2013). Exploring the developments in urbanisation, aid dependency, sectoral shifts and services sector expansion in Fiji: a modern growth perspective. Global Business and Economics Review, 15, 371-395.
  17. Kumar, R.R. (2011) ‘Do remittances, exports and financial development matter