KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2021 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

COMBINING ABILITY AND GENE ACTIONS FOR GLUTEN RHEOLOGICAL TRAITS OF “LINE×TESTER” BREAD WHEAT HYBRIDS

Imren KUTLU
Yasar KARADUMAN
Sayfa
60–70
Yayın Tarihi
2021-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This first report, which sheds light on the genetic analysis of GlutoPeak parameters, should be supported by studies that will examine the Glutopeak properties in different segregation generations of hybrids with different originated parents.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The fast and reliable measurement techniques in determining bread-making quality such as GlutoPeak parameters is need in a cereal quality breeding programs.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Therefore, this study intended to investigate gene actions in the inheritance of gluten rheological properties measured by Glutopeak tester in 28 hybrids of “Line×Tester” bread wheat and their 11 parents based on knowledge of combining ability.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This first report, which sheds light on the genetic analysis of GlutoPeak parameters, should be supported by studies that will examine the Glutopeak properties in different segregation generations of hybrids with different originated parents.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2000 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Combining ability · end-use quality · quality breeding

Abstract

The fast and reliable measurement techniques in determining bread-making quality such as GlutoPeak parameters is need in a cereal quality breeding programs. Therefore, this study intended to investigate gene actions in the inheritance of gluten rheological properties measured by Glutopeak tester in 28 hybrids of “Line×Tester” bread wheat and their 11 parents based on knowledge of combining ability. There was a prominence of non-additive gene effects for all the traits examined. Well-performed parents such as DH20 and Harmankaya-99 were good combiners for almost all examined traits. “DH16×Bezostaja-1”, “DH20×Bezostaja- 1”, “DH20×Harmankaya-99”, “DH21×Altay-2000”, and “DH22×Kate A-1” were promising combinations based on their SCA effects. There may be an opportunity to select the best genotypes in the F2 generation for protein rate, sedimentation value and GlutoPeak parameters such as peak maximum time (PMT) and maximum torque (AM and PM) considering the little increase in narrow sense heritability. This first report, which sheds light on the genetic analysis of GlutoPeak parameters, should be supported by studies that will examine the Glutopeak properties in different segregation generations of hybrids with different originated parents.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KUTLU, I., KARADUMAN, Y. (2021). COMBINING ABILITY AND GENE ACTIONS FOR GLUTEN RHEOLOGICAL TRAITS OF “LINE×TESTER” BREAD WHEAT HYBRIDS. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 60–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/217489

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. AACC. 2010. Approved Methods of Analysis, 11th Ed. Method 39-01.01. Evaluation of NIR instrument calibration. Approved November 17, 2010. Cereals & Grains Association, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A. Al-Naggar, A., R. Shabana, M. M. Abd El-Aleem and A. El- Rashidy Zainab. 2015. Diallel analysis of wheat grain protein content and yield in F1 and F2 generations under contrasting nitrogen conditions. American Research Journal of Agriculture 1(4): 12-29.
  2. Amoriello, T., V. Turfani, V. Galli, F. Mellara and M. Carcea. 2016. Evaluation of new viscometer performance in predicting the technological quality of soft wheat flour. Cereal Chemistry 93: 364-368.
  3. Aydogan, S., M. Sahin, A. G. Akcacik, S. Hamzaoglu and S. Taner. 2015. Relationships between Farinograph Parameters and Bread Volume, Physicochemical Traits in Bread Wheat Flours. Journal of Bahri Dagdas Crop Research 3(1): 14-18.
  4. Baslar, M. and M. F. Ertugay. 2011. Determination of protein and gluten quality-related parameters of wheat flour using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 35(2): 139-144.
  5. Boeven, P. H., Y. Zhao, P. Thorwarth, F. Liu, H. P. Maurer, M. Gils and V. Mirdita. 2020. Negative dominance and dominance-by-dominance epistatic effects reduce grain-yield heterosis in wide crosses in wheat. Science Advances 6 (24): eaay4897. Bordes, J., G. Branlard, F. X. Oury, G. Charmet and F. Balfourier. 2008. Agronomic characteristics, grain quality and flour rheology of 372 bread wheats in a worldwide core collection. Journal of Cereal Science 48(3): 569-579.
  6. Bouachra, S., J. Begemann, L. Aarab and A. Hüsken. 2017. Prediction of bread wheat baking quality using an optimized GlutoPeak®-Test method. Journal of Cereal Science 76: 8- 16. Egesel, C., F. Kahrıman, S. Tayyar and H. Baytekin. 2009. Interrelations of flour quality traits with grain yield in bread wheat and choosing suitable cultivars. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Science 24(2): 76-83.
  7. Falconer, D.S. and T.F.C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Fourth Edition.
  8. Longman, ISBN: 0582-23302-5, 464 p. Fu, B.X., K. Wang and B. Dupuis. 2017. Predicting water absorption of wheat flour using high shear-based GlutoPeak test. Journal of Cereal Science 76: 116-121.
  9. Gabriel, D., C. Pfitzner, N. U. Haase, A. Hüsken, H. Prüfer, J. M. Greef and G. Rühl. 2017. New strategies for a reliable assessment of baking quality of wheat–Rethinking the current indicator protein content. Journal of Cereal Science 77: 1