This paper reports the modifications carried out on the GRASS model so as to make it teachable to the learners and how it can be applied in solving complex stoichiometric problems.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:A major stumbling block to students’ success in solving complex stoichiometric problems is that learners store information in a compartmentalized way and cannot transfer what is learned in one context to another context.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To address this concern, chemistry educators developed problem-solving models as pedagogical aids to improve student performance.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This paper reports the modifications carried out on the GRASS model so as to make it teachable to the learners and how it can be applied in solving complex stoichiometric problems.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
A major stumbling block to students’ success in solving complex stoichiometric problems is that learners store information in a compartmentalized way and cannot transfer what is learned in one context to another context. To address this concern, chemistry educators developed problem-solving models as pedagogical aids to improve student performance. Unfortunately, most of the problem-solving models have deficiencies in that they are not teachable and their applications to complex problems face some hindrances. This paper reports the modifications carried out on the GRASS model so as to make it teachable to the learners and how it can be applied in solving complex stoichiometric problems.
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
OKANLAWON, A. E. (2008). The Modified GRASS Model: An Alternate Path to Solve Complex Stoichiometric Problems. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 11–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/216395
Anderson, O. R. (1991). Neurocognitive models of information processing and knowledge acquisition. Progress in Sensory Physiology, 12, 115-192
Ault, A. (2001). How to say how much: Amounts and stoichiometry. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(10), 1347 – 1349. Bello, O. O. (1990). A preliminary study of chemistry students’ error in stoichiometric problems. Journal of Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria, 26(2), 67-73.
Bodner, G. M. (2003). Problem solving: the difference between what we do and what we tell students to do. University Chemistry Education, 7, 37-45.
Bodner, G. M. (2007). Strengthening conceptual connections in introductory chemistry courses. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(1), 93 – 100. BouJaoude, S. (1994). Students’ systematic errors when solving kinetic and chemical equilibrium problems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA., April 15-19, 1993. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 361196. BouJaoude, S. & Barakat, H. (2003). Student’s problem solving strategies in stoichiometry and their relationships to conceptual understanding and learning approaches. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 7(3), Online Journal, http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejese.html.
Bunce, D. M., Gabel, D. L., and Samuel, J. V. (1991). Enhancing chemistry problem- solving achievement using problem categorization. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(6), 505 – 521. Bunce, D. M., & Heikkinen, H. (1986). The effects of an explicit problem solving approach on mathematics chemistry achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 11- 20. Chi, M. T. H., & Koeske, R. D. (1983). Network representation of a child’s dinosaur knowledge. Development Psychology, 19, 29-39
Cross, K. P. (1999). Learning is about making connections. The cross papers number 3, Mission Viejo, CA, League for innovation in the Community College and Education Testing Service. Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1995). Students’ conceptions and constructivist teaching approaches. In B. J. Fraser and H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Improving Science Education (pp. 46-69), The National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago, Illinois. Eniayeju, P. A. (1990). Seeking meaning in mole ratio instruction. Journal of Science Teacher’s Association of Nigeria, 26(2), 93- 100. Gabel, D. L. & Bunce, D. M. (1994). Research on problem solving. In D. Gabel (ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (p