Dergiler / Alphanumeric Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Disassembly Line Balancing by Using Simulation Optimization

Sayfa
63–84
Yayın Tarihi
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This comparison indicates that GA outperforms SA in four of eight performance measures while both algorithms have the same value for line efficiency measure.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Öz Increasing environmental awareness in today's society and stricter environmental regulations have forced manufacturing firms to take necessary actions for the recovery of end-of-life (EOL) products through different options (e.g., recycling, remanufacturing,).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Since the disassembly line balancing problem has a combinatorial nature, two commonly used metaheuristics (i.e., genetic algorithms (GAs) and simulated annealing (SA)) are integrated with the simulation model in order to balance the disassembly line.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This comparison indicates that GA outperforms SA in four of eight performance measures while both algorithms have the same value for line efficiency measure.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anahtar Kelimeler Line Balancing · Disassembly · Genetic Algorithms

Özet

Öz Increasing environmental awareness in today's society and stricter environmental regulations have forced manufacturing firms to take necessary actions for the recovery of end-of-life (EOL) products through different options (e.g., recycling, remanufacturing,). Disassembly is regarded as a critical operation in EOL treatment of used products since all product recovery options require the disassembly of EOL products at certain levels. This critical operation is generally carried out by forming disassembly lines in product recovery facilities. Miscellaneous methodologies based on heuristics, metaheuristics and mathematical programming have been proposed for the balancing of disassembly lines. Majority of those methodologies assume that disassembly line parameters are deterministic by ignoring the fact that a disassembly line involves great deal of uncertainty mainly due to uncertain conditions of arriving EOL products. Considering this high level of uncertainty, simulation modeling can be an effective tool for the modeling of disassembly lines. In this study, a simulation-based disassembly line balancing methodology is proposed for the explicit consideration of stochastic parameters. First, simulation model of a disassembly line is constructed. Since the disassembly line balancing problem has a combinatorial nature, two commonly used metaheuristics (i.e., genetic algorithms (GAs) and simulated annealing (SA)) are integrated with the simulation model in order to balance the disassembly line. The disassembly sequence and task assignments proposed by GA are compared with the sequence and task assignments proposed by SA. This comparison indicates that GA outperforms SA in four of eight performance measures while both algorithms have the same value for line efficiency measure.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKPINAR, M. E., ILGIN, M. A., AKTAŞ, H. (2021). Disassembly Line Balancing by Using Simulation Optimization. Alphanumeric Journal, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 63–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/216234

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Agrawal, S., & Tiwari, M. K. (2008). A collaborative ant colony algorithm to stochastic mixed-model U-shaped disassembly line balancing and sequencing problem. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600943985
  2. Altekin, F. T. (2017). A comparison of piecewise linear programming formulations for stochastic disassembly line balancing. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1351639
  3. Altekin, F. T., & Akkan, C. (2012). Task-failure-driven rebalancing of disassembly lines. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.616915
  4. Altekin, F. T., Bayındır, Z. P., & Gümüşkaya, V. (2016). Remedial actions for disassembly lines with stochastic task times. Computers and Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.06.027
  5. Altekin, F. T., Kandiller, L., & Ozdemirel, N. E. (2008). Profit-oriented disassembly-line balancing. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540601137207
  6. Ameli, M., Mansour, S., & Ahmadi-Javid, A. (2019). A simulation-optimization model for sustainable product design and efficient end-of-life management based on individual producer responsibility. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.031
  7. Amiri, M., & Mohtashami, A. (2012). Buffer allocation in unreliable production lines based on design of experiments, simulation, and genetic algorithm. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3802-8
  8. Avikal, S., Jain, R., & Mishra, P. K. (2014).
  9. A Kano model, AHP and M-TOPSIS method-based technique for disassembly line balancing under fuzzy environment. Applied Soft Computing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.002
  10. Avikal, S., Mishra, P. K., & Jain, R. (2013). An AHP and PROMETHEE methods-based environment friendly heuristic for disassembly line balancing problems. Interdisciplinary Environmental Review. https://doi.org/10.1504/ier.2013.054125
  11. Avikal, S., Mishra, P. K., & Jain, R. (2014). A Fuzzy AHP and PROMETHEE method-based heuristic for disassembly line balancing problems. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.831999
  12. Avikal, S., Mishra, P. K., Jain, R., & Yadav, H. C. (2013). A PROMETHEE Method Based Heuristic for Disassembly Line Balancing Problem. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.7232/iems.2013.12.3.254 Azadivar