Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2009 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Can science pedagogy in english schools inform educational reform in Turkey?

Sayfa
66–80
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The conditions needed to bring about a major shift in classroom pedagogic practices are considered, with special reference to how the situation in England can inform Turkish science education.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper discusses the nature of science education in England, where constructivist principles have informed science education for several decades.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A series of lesson observations were carried out to explore the extent to which English science lessons match the ‘ideal’ of constructivist teaching that has now become the expected approach recommended by the Turkish government.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The conditions needed to bring about a major shift in classroom pedagogic practices are considered, with special reference to how the situation in England can inform Turkish science education.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This paper discusses the nature of science education in England, where constructivist principles have informed science education for several decades. A series of lesson observations were carried out to explore the extent to which English science lessons match the ‘ideal’ of constructivist teaching that has now become the expected approach recommended by the Turkish government. Four schools and a sixth form college were visited to meet staff and observe some teaching. Two lessons in each of the schools, and five in the college, were observed. An observation guide developed from the research literature was used to focus observations on aspects of teaching and learning considered most relevant to a constructivist approach. In particular eight areas were identified that might potentially distinguish between the more traditional teaching common in Turkey and the recommended ideal of ‘constructivist’ teaching. The overall characterization of the science teaching observed was that it was generally ‘progressive’ when compared with the traditional lessons that make up the common practice in Turkey. However, this study suggests that science teaching in England does not fully match the ideal of constructivist teaching. The conditions needed to bring about a major shift in classroom pedagogic practices are considered, with special reference to how the situation in England can inform Turkish science education.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BEKTAŞ, O., TABER, K. S. (2009). Can science pedagogy in english schools inform educational reform in Turkey?. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 66–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/215566

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The Process of Education. New York: Vintage Books. Cerini, B., Murray, I., & Reiss, M. (2003). Student Review of the Science Curriculum: Major Findings. London: Planet Science/Institute of Education/Science Museumo. Document Number) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2001). Research Methods in Education, 5th Edition, London and New York-Routledge Falmer. Crawford, R. (2000). Information technology in secondary schools and its impact on training information technology teachers. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(2), 183-198. Department for Education and Employment. (1998). Requirements for Courses of Initial Teacher Education: Annexe H - Initial Teacher Training National Curriculum for Secondary Science. DfEE/QCA. (1999). Science: The National Curriculum for England, key stages 1-4. London: Department for Education and Employment/Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. Dorion, K. R. (2007). Science through drama: a multiple case exploration of the characteristics of drama activities in secondary science lessons. University of Cambridge, Cambridge. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
  2. Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122.
  3. Fensham, P. J. (2004). Defining an Identity: The evolution of science education as a field of research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  4. Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1994). The Content of Science: a constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: Falmer Press. House of Lords Science and Technology Committee. (2006). Science Teaching in Schools: Report with Evidence (Vol. HL Paper 257). London: The Stationery Office Limited. Jenkins, E. W. (2000). Constructivism in school science education: Powerful model or the most dangerous intellectual tendency?, Science & Education 9, 599–610.
  5. Jenkins, E. W. (2004). From option to compulsion: school science teaching, 1954–2004. School Science Review, 85(313), 33-40.
  6. Kaymaz, Z. (2007). A case study on an English science teacher’s views and practice in relation to constructivism University of Cambridge, Cambridge. Key Stage 3 National Strategy. (2002a). Framework for teaching science: years 7, 8 and 9. London: Department for Education and Skills. Key Stage 3 National Strategy. (2002b). Misconceptio