KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2009 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Prospective biology and chemistry teachers' satisfaction with laboratory and laboratory facilities: The effect of gender and university

Mehmet ERDOĞAN
Muhammet UŞAK
Murat ÖZEL
Sayfa
60–71
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Most of variance of dependent variable was accounted by the effect of school (university) which suggests that school facilities greatly influence student satisfaction.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of the study was to investigate last year prospective biology and chemistry teachers’ satisfaction level with laboratory and laboratory facilities offered by their department and faculty with regard to gender and university. 60 senior prospective Biology Teachers and 101 senior prospective Chemistry Teachers participated in the study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For this study, we used “laboratory and its facilities” subscale consisting of 14 items.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Most of variance of dependent variable was accounted by the effect of school (university) which suggests that school facilities greatly influence student satisfaction.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate last year prospective biology and chemistry teachers’ satisfaction level with laboratory and laboratory facilities offered by their department and faculty with regard to gender and university. 60 senior prospective Biology Teachers and 101 senior prospective Chemistry Teachers participated in the study. Prospective Science Teacher Satisfaction Scale (PSTSS) was used for obtaining relevant data. PSTSS consists of five sub-scales. For this study, we used “laboratory and its facilities” subscale consisting of 14 items. The alpha (α) level of this subscale was .93. The results pointed out that last year prospective Biology and Chemistry Teachers had a tendency towards satisfaction on biology and chemistry laboratories but not at the desired level. Significant difference was not observed between male and female participants. Most of variance of dependent variable was accounted by the effect of school (university) which suggests that school facilities greatly influence student satisfaction.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERDOĞAN, M., UŞAK, M., ÖZEL, M. (2009). Prospective biology and chemistry teachers' satisfaction with laboratory and laboratory facilities: The effect of gender and university. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 60–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/214358

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Ayas, A., Çepni, S. & Akdeniz, A. R. (1994). Fen bilimlerinde laboratuarin yeri ve önemi - I, Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 204, 21- 25. Adelman, C. (1991). Women at Thirtysomething: Paradoxes of Attainment. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Bacon, R., & Drury, T.A. (1998). Using technology in science education: case studies from chemistry and physics. Information Service & Use, 18(1/2), 9-14.
  2. Bell, S. (1994). Students' satisfaction at York University, Canada. Paper presented at the Annual Con at York University, Canada. Paper presented of the Society for Research in Higher Education, York, England, December 19-21, 1994.
  3. Bulut, S. (1999). Changes in mathematics teacher education program in Turkey. The Mathematics Educator, 9(2), 30-33.
  4. Barrett, W.O. (1995). How college affects students [Review of the book How college affects students]. Arts Education Policy Review, 95(3), 37-41
  5. Burkam, D. T., Lee, V. E., & Smerdon, B. A. (1997). Gender and science learning early in high school: subject matter and laboratory experiences. American Education Research Journal, 34(2), 297-331.
  6. Cameron, K. & Ettington, D. (1988). The conceptual foundations of organizational culture. In J. Smart (ed.), Higher Education Handbook of Theory and Research, 4, 356-398.
  7. Cem, Z.G. (2002). Biyoloji öğretiminde laboratuar kullanımı ve laboratuar çalışmalarında karşılaşılan problemler. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi,
  8. İzmir.
  9. Ceylan, S., & Demirkaya, H. (2006). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının sınıf öğretmenliği programı ve program dahilinde sunulan hizmetler konusundaki memnuniyet düzeyleri. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12, 146-160.
  10. Çepni, S., Akdeniz, A. R., & Ayas, A. (1995). Fen bilimleri eğitiminde laboratuarin yeri ve önemi - III: ülkemizde laboratuarin kullanimi ve bazi öneriler, Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 206, 24- 28. Demirci, B.(1993). Çağdaş fen bilimleri eğitimi ve eğitimcileri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9, 155-157.
  11. Elliott, K.M., & Shin, D. (2002). Student satisfaction: an alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(2), 197-209.
  12. Elster, D. (2007). Student interests - The German and Austrian ROSE survey. Journal of Biological Education, 42(1), 5-11.
  13. Erdoğan, M., Uşak, M. & Aydin, H., (2008). Investigating prospective teachers’ satisfaction with social services and facilities in Turkish universities. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 7(