KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2010 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Implementation of cooperative learning and guided discussion methods in science teaching to improve professional skills of student teachers

AHMET ZEKİ SAKA
Sayfa
30–51
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was concluded that this approach provided practitioners with an increase in their academic achievement obtaining the chance for eliciting ideas and improving their professional skills in relation to the scientific process skills about effective science learning and teaching through their own teaching practice in faculty before actual teaching practice in school.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to investigate the effects of a combined approach including cooperative learning and guided discussion methods in science teaching on student teachers’ achievements and their professional skills development.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Theoretical framework of this combined approach was settled and implemented by the researcher’own experiences.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was concluded that this approach provided practitioners with an increase in their academic achievement obtaining the chance for eliciting ideas and improving their professional skills in relation to the scientific process skills about effective science learning and teaching through their own teaching practice in faculty before actual teaching practice in school.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2005-2006 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effects of a combined approach including cooperative learning and guided discussion methods in science teaching on student teachers’ achievements and their professional skills development. Theoretical framework of this combined approach was settled and implemented by the researcher’own experiences. Hence, action research method was chosen as a research methodology. Research sample consists of 133 (45+44+44) 3rd year elementary student teachers who take courses of Science Teaching I-II in the Department of Primary Education in the Faculty of Education at the Sakarya University in Turkey in the 2005-2006 (45) and 2006-2007 (44+44) education term. It was concluded that this approach provided practitioners with an increase in their academic achievement obtaining the chance for eliciting ideas and improving their professional skills in relation to the scientific process skills about effective science learning and teaching through their own teaching practice in faculty before actual teaching practice in school.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SAKA, A. Z. (2010). Implementation of cooperative learning and guided discussion methods in science teaching to improve professional skills of student teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 30–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/212711

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Angelides, P. (2002). A collaborative approach for teachers’in-service training, Journal of Education for Teaching, 28(1), 81-82.
  2. Barier, R. (2005, Semptember). Making sense of safety, The Science Teacher, 30-33.
  3. Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of Learning Sciences, 9, 403–436.
  4. Bleicher, R. (2002, April). Increasing confidence in preservice elementary teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Bottge, B. & Hasselbring, T. (1993). A comparison of two approaches for teaching complex, authentic mathematics problems to adolescents in remedial math classes. Exceptional Children, 59(6), 545-556.
  5. Bowers, C.K. &. Simonis, D.G. (2004). Longitudinal Study of Middle Grades Chemistry Professional Development: Enhancement of Personal Science Teaching Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(3), 175–195.
  6. Cammarata, L. & Tedick, D. J. (2007). Content-Based Language Teaching with Technology, National Educational Technology Standards for Students Curriculum Series: Foreign Lanugage Units for All Proficiency Levels, 147-188.
  7. Carey, S., & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 235-251.
  8. Carter, R. (1998). Action research in partnership: establishing teachers as key players on the school effectiveness stage, Educational Action Research, 6(2), 275-303.
  9. Christina, V. S, Yovita. N. G. (2006). Guided inquiry and modeling instructional framework, (EIMA) to Support Preservice K-8 Science Teaching, Science Education, DOI 10.1002/sce.20177, 159-186.
  10. Chin, C. & Osborne, J. (2008, March). Students’ questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science, Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1-39.
  11. Cobb, P., Perlwitz, M., & Underwood-Greg, D. (1998). Individual construction, mathematical acculturation, and the classroom community. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz, & J. Garrison (Eds.), Constructivism and education (pp. 63–80). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Donnelly, R. (2007). Perveived impact of peer observation of teaching in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 117-129.
  13. Driver, R. (1989). The construction of scientific knowledge in school classrooms. In R. Millar (Ed.), Doing science: Images of science in science education (pp. 83–106). Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
  14. Driver, R., Asoko,