Dergiler / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

Spatial and temporal variation of respirable particles around a surface coal mine in India

Sayfa
662–679
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Extremely limited literature suggests that more studies are required for better understanding and evaluation of mining contribution to the local PM level.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:People living around surface mines are exposed to enhanced respirable particle level.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Particle concentration and concurrent meteorological parameters at 24 locations were measured along four sections from the mine boundary up to 500 m using an aerosol spectrometer and portable weather station.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Extremely limited literature suggests that more studies are required for better understanding and evaluation of mining contribution to the local PM level.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

People living around surface mines are exposed to enhanced respirable particle level. Not many studies are available that evaluated the contribution of mining to it. The paper presented the result of study that investigated spatio-temporal variability of particle concentrations around a surface coal mine in eastern part of India. Particle concentration and concurrent meteorological parameters at 24 locations were measured along four sections from the mine boundary up to 500 m using an aerosol spectrometer and portable weather station. SPSS 20.0 was used for statistical analysis. Average PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 concentration varied in the range 212.67 ± 168.76–524.46 ± 137.57 μg m−3 , and 89.53 ± 77.62–297.41 ± 107.10 μg m−3 and 66.22 ± 58.05–246.66 ± 84.26 μg m−3 respectively. This is equivalent to 2.74, 1.34 and 2.77 times the background concentration of PM2.5-10, PM1-2.5 and PM1 respectively. Respirable particles up to 500 m from the mine comprised of 27–73%, 8–12% and 18–61% of PM2.5-10, PM1-2.5 and PM1. During peak production period, the concentration of respirable particles around the mine increased by a factor 5–15 of the average concentrations. Distance and meteorological parameters explained up to 55% of the variability of particle concentration. Present Indian norm to allow an ambient PM10 concentration of 250 μg m−3 at a distance of 500 m is not met, in spite of the study mine is only 10 years old. Extremely limited literature suggests that more studies are required for better understanding and evaluation of mining contribution to the local PM level.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SAHU, S. P., PATRA, A. K., KOLLURU, S. S. R. (2018). Spatial and temporal variation of respirable particles around a surface coal mine in India. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 662–679. https://ajindex.com/articles/212566

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Aneja, V.P., Isherwood, A., Morgan, P., 2012. Characterization of particulate matter (PM10) related to surface coal mining operations in Appalachia. Atmos. Environ. 54, 496–501.
  2. Banks, D.E., Wang, M.L., Lapp, N.L., 1998. Respiratory health effects of opencast coalmining: a cross sectional study of current workers. Occup. Environ. Med. 55 (4), 287. Bhowmick, T., Bandopadhyay, S., Ghosh, T., 2015. Three-dimensional CFD modeling approach to approximate air pollution conditions in high-latitude open-pit mines. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 168, 741–753.
  3. Boyd, J.T., Doll, R., Faulds, J.S., Leiper, J., 1970. Cancer of the lung in iron ore (haematite) miners. Br. J. Ind. Med. 27 (2), 97–105.
  4. Buzea, C., Pacheco, I.I., Robbie, K., 2007. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: sources and toxicity. Biointerphases 2 (4), MR17–MR71. Chakraborty, M.K., Ahmad, M., Singh, R.S., Pal, D., Bandopadhyay, C., Chaulya, S.K., 2002. Determination of the emission rate from various opencast mining operations. Environ. Model. Software 17 (5), 467–480.
  5. Chaloulakou, A., Kassomenos, P., Spyrellis, N., Demokritou, P., Koutrakis, P., 2003. Measurements of PM10 and PM2.5 particle concentrations in Athens, Greece. Atmos. Environ. 37 (5), 649–660.
  6. Chaulya, S.K., 2006. Emission rate formulae for surface iron ore mining activities. Environ. Model. Assess. 11 (4), 361–370.
  7. Chaulya, S.K., Ahmad, M., Singh, R.S., Bandopadhyay, L., Bondyopadhay, C., Mondal, G.C., 2003. Validation of two air quality models for Indian mining conditions. Environ. Monit. Assess. 82 (1), 23–43.
  8. Chen, S.Y., Hayes, R.B., Liang, S.R., Li, Q.G., Stewart, P.A., Blair, A., 1990. Mortality experience of hematite mine workers in China. Br. J. Ind. Med. 47 (3), 175–181.
  9. Chinthala, S., Khare, M., 2011. Particle Dispersion within a Deep Opencast Coal Mine. INTECH Open Access Publisher. Coal Statistics, 2015-16. http://www.coalcontroller.gov.in/writereaddata /files/Coal %20Directory%20of%20India%202015–202016.pdf (accessed on September 18, 2017).
  10. Coggon, D., Taylor, A.N., 1998. Coal mining and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review of the evidence. Thorax 53 (5), 398–407. CPCB, 2009. http://cpcb.nic.in/National_Ambient_Air_Quality_Standards.php (accessed on January 28, 2016).
  11. Davies, T.C., Mundalamo, H.R., 2010. Environmental health impacts of dispersed mineralisation in South Africa. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 58 (4), 652–666.
  12. Dinoi, A., Donateo, A., Belosi, F., Conte, M., Contini, D., 2017. Comparison of atmospheric particle concentrati