KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 6

Estimating spatial variability of ground-level PM 2.5 based on a satellite- derived aerosol optical depth product: Fuzhou, China

Lijuan YANG
Hanqiu XU
Zhifan JİN
Sayfa
1194–1203
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results suggest that the mixed effects model using MODIS 3 km AOD together with meteorological data could be effective for the estimation of PM 2.5 concentrations in the Fuzhou area.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Estimating exposure to PM 2.5 within urban areas has important implications for human health.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Satellite remote sensing provides an effective means to retrieve spatial coverage of PM 2.5 concentrations.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results suggest that the mixed effects model using MODIS 3 km AOD together with meteorological data could be effective for the estimation of PM 2.5 concentrations in the Fuzhou area.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Estimating exposure to PM 2.5 within urban areas has important implications for human health. Satellite remote sensing provides an effective means to retrieve spatial coverage of PM 2.5 concentrations. Using the monitoring network established by the local government in 2014, this study developed a linear mixed effects model that integrates aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements (spatial resolution: 3 km) from MODIS and meteorological data from GEOS-FP meteorological fields as predictors to derive daily estimations of ground-level PM 2.5 con- centrations in Fuzhou (SE China). A 10-fold cross validation method was employed to examine the performance of the mixed effects model. The cross validation yielded a R 2 value of 0.72, and a root mean square error value of 9.2 μg/m 3 for the mixed effects model. Furthermore, the monthly/seasonal average PM 2.5 estimated by the mixed effects model was highly correlated with those of in situ measurements. The results also revealed the spatial differences in the PM 2.5 distribution across the study area, i.e., higher concentrations in the urban center and lower values in suburban to rural areas. The results suggest that the mixed effects model using MODIS 3 km AOD together with meteorological data could be effective for the estimation of PM 2.5 concentrations in the Fuzhou area.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YANG, L., XU, H., JİN, Z. (2018). Estimating spatial variability of ground-level PM 2.5 based on a satellite- derived aerosol optical depth product: Fuzhou, China. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 6, 1194–1203. https://ajindex.com/articles/210934

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Bates, D., Maechler, M., 2010. lme4: Linear Mixed-effects Models Using S4 Classes. R package version 0.999375-35. http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package = lme4. Beckerman, B.S., Jerrett, M., Serre, M., Martin, R.V., Lee, S.J., van Donkelaar, A., Ross, Z., Su, J., Burnett, R.T., 2013. A hybrid approach to estimating national scale spatio- temporal variability of PM 2.5 in the contiguous United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (13), 7233. Beckerman, B.S., Jerrett, M., Martin, R.V., van Donkelaar, A., Ross, Z., Burnett, R.T., 2012. Application of the deletion/substitution/addition algorithm to selecting land use regression models for interpolating air pollution measurements in California. Atmos. Environ. 77, 172–177.
  2. Cheng, Z., Jiang, J.K., Fajardo, O., Wang, O.S., Hao, J., 2013. Characteristics and health impacts of particulate matter pollution in China (2001-2011). Atmos. Environ. 65, 186–194.
  3. Engle-Cox, J.A., Holloman, C.H., Coutant, B.W., 2004. Qualitative and quantitative eva- luation of MODIS satellite sensor data for regional and urban scale air quality. Atmos. Environ. 38 (16), 2495–2509.
  4. Franklin, M., Zeka, A., Schwartz, J., 2007. Association between PM 2.5 and all-cause and specific cause mortality in 27 US communities. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 17 (3), 279–287.
  5. Ghotbi, S., Sotoudeheian, S., Arhami, M., 2016. Estimating urban ground-level PM 10 using MODIS 3 km AOD product and meteorological parameters from WRF model. Atmos. Environ. 141, 333–346.
  6. Gupta, P., Christopher, S.A., 2009. Particulate matter air quality assessment using in- tegrated surface, satellite, and meteorological products: multiple regression ap- proach. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 114 (D14), 1159–1171.
  7. He, Q.S., Mao, J.T., 2005. Observation of urban mixed layer at Beijing using a micropulse lidar. Acta Meteorol. Sin. 63, 36–43.
  8. Hsu, Y.M., Wang, X.L., Chow, J.C., 2016. Collocated comparisons of continuous and filter- based PM 2.5 measurements at Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 66 (3), 329–339.
  9. Hu, X.F., Waller, L.A., Mohammad, Z.A., 2013. Estimating ground-level PM 2.5 con- centrations in the southeastern U.S. using geographically weighted regression. Environ. Res. 121 (2), 1–10.
  10. Hutchison, K.D., Smith, S., Faruqui, S.J., 2005. Correlating MODIS aerosol optical thickness data with ground-based PM 2.5 observations across Texas for use in a real- time air quality prediction system. Atmos. Environ. 39 (37), 7190–7203.
  11. Ibanez, T., Keppel, G., Baider, C., et al