Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2010 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Pre-service chemistry teachers’ ideas about reaction mechanism

Sayfa
47–60
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAŞTAN, Ö., YALÇINKAYA, E., BOZ, Y. (2010). Pre-service chemistry teachers’ ideas about reaction mechanism. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 47–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/209953

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Abraham, M.R., Williamson, V.M., & Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A cross-age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147 – 165. BouJaoude, S. (1993, April). Students' systematic errors when solving chemical equilibrium problems. Paper presented at the NARST, Atlanta. Bozkoyun, Y. (2004). Facilitating conceptual change in learning rate of reaction concepts. Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara,
  2. Turkey. Brown, T. L., LeMay, H. E., & Bursten, B.E. (2006). Chemistry the central science, 10th Ed, USA: Pearson Education, Inc. Camacho, M., & Good, R. (1989). Problem solving and chemical equilibrium: successful vs. Unsuccessful performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(3), 251 – 272. Çakmakçı, G. (2005). A cross-sectional study of the understanding of chemical kinetics among Turkish secondary and undergraduate students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Çakmakçı, G., Leach, J., & Donnelly, J. (2006). Students’ ideas about reaction rate and its relationship with concentration or pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1795–1815.
  3. Doymuş, K. (2008). Teaching chemical equilibrium with the jigsaw technique. Research in Science Education, 38(2), 249-260.
  4. Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84.
  5. Ebenezer, J.V., & Ericson, G.L. (1996). Chemistry students’ conceptions of solubility: A phenomenography. Science Education, 80(2), 181–201.
  6. Gabel, D.L., Samuel, K.V., & Hunn, D. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(8), 695–697.
  7. Garnet, P.J. (1992). Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry. Electric circuits and oxidation reduction equations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 121 – 142. Gussarsky, E., & Gorodetsky, M. (1988). On the chemical equilibrium concept: Constrained word associations and conception. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(5), 319 – 333. Hackling, M. W., & Garnett, P. J. (1985). Misconceptions of chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 205-214.
  8. Haidar, H.A., & Abraham, R.M. (1991). A comparison of applied and theoretical knowledge of concept based on the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Research in Scie