Dergiler / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 6

Spatial and temporal variation of O3, NO and NO2 concentrations at rural and urban sites in Marmara Region of Turkey

Sayfa
1009–1020
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

AOT40 (accumulated exposure over a threshold of 40 ppb) index was performed for both vegetation and forestry standards and EU Directive were significantly exceeded at all rural stations.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The first continuous measurements of the hourly surface ozone (O3), nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations at 7 rural and 15 urban sites in Marmara Region of Turkey during the period from March 2013 to April 2016.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The results indicate that surface O3 is an extensive problem throughout the Marmara Region.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:AOT40 (accumulated exposure over a threshold of 40 ppb) index was performed for both vegetation and forestry standards and EU Directive were significantly exceeded at all rural stations.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The first continuous measurements of the hourly surface ozone (O3), nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations at 7 rural and 15 urban sites in Marmara Region of Turkey during the period from March 2013 to April 2016. The results indicate that surface O3 is an extensive problem throughout the Marmara Region. O3 levels have similar seasonal pattern in rural and urban sites by following the order of summer, spring, fall, and winter. The seasonal results showed an opposite behaviour among O3 and NOx (NO + NO2) in both rural and urban sites, marked by maximums (minimum NOx) of O3 in summer and minimums (maximum NOx) in fall and winter. The summer concentrations vary between 91.5 and 123.6 μg/m3 and 74.6–112.4 μg/m3 at rural and urban sites respectively. Furthermore, O3 peak concentration time in rural areas in O3 seasons (April–September) occurred at around 17:00–18:00 LST while in urban areas at around 15:00–16:00 LST, respectively. Air quality standards for O3 concentrations in Sile and Yalova rural sites were significantly exceeded during O3 season. This exceedance made a linkage between back trajectories and air masses with respect to the O3 levels. 72-hr back trajectories at an altitude of 500 m agl were computed by HYSPLIT model to assess the type of air masses which reach the area. AOT40 (accumulated exposure over a threshold of 40 ppb) index was performed for both vegetation and forestry standards and EU Directive were significantly exceeded at all rural stations.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KASPAROĞLU, S., İNCECİK, S., TOPÇU, H. S. (2018). Spatial and temporal variation of O3, NO and NO2 concentrations at rural and urban sites in Marmara Region of Turkey. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 6, 1009–1020. https://ajindex.com/articles/209838

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Adame, J.A., Sole, J., 2013. Surface ozone variations at a rural area in the northeast of the Iberian Peninsula. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 4, 130–141.
  2. Al-Jeelani, H.A., 2014. Diurnal and seasonal variations of surface O3 and its precursors in the atmosphere of Yanbu, Saudi Arabia. J. Environ. Prot. 5, 408–422. http://dx.doi. org/10.4236/jep.2014.55044. Amann, M., Derwent, D., Forsberg, B., Hänninen, O., Hurley, F., Krzyzanowski, M., de Leeuw, F., Liu, S.J., Mandin, C., Schneider, J., Schwarze, P., Simpson, D., 2008. Health Risks of O3 from Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution WHO. Denmark, Copenhagen. Anteplioğlu, U., 2000. Investigation of surface O3 by photochemical-dynamic model in Istanbul (in Turkish). (PhD Thesis. Istanbul Technical University. Anteplioğlu, U., Topcu, S., Incecik, S., 2003. An application of a photochemical model for urban air shed in Istanbul. J. Water, Air & Soil Pollut. Focus 3, 53–64.
  3. Ashmore, M.R., 2005. Assessing the future global impacts of O3 on vegetation. Plant Cell Environ. 28, 949–964.
  4. Atalay, I., Efe, R., 2010. Structural and distributional evaluation of forest ecosystem in Turkey. J. Env. Biology 31, 61–70.
  5. Beig, G., et al., 2008. Threshold exceedances and cumulative O3 exposure indices at tropical suburban site. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L02802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/ 2007GL031434. Booker, F.L., et al., 2009. The O3 component of global change: potential effects on agricultural and horticultural plant yield, product quality and interactions with invasive species. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 51, 337–351.
  6. Boucouvala, D., Bornstein, R., 2003. Meteorological analysis of observations from a 1997 Southern California O3 Study (SCOS97) episode. Atmos. Environ. 37, 73–94.
  7. Cannon, A., Whitfield, P., Lord, E., 2002. Synoptic map-pattern classification using recursive partitioning and principal component analysis. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 130, 1187–1206. CEC (Commission of the European Communities), 2008. Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 may 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. Official J. Eur. Union L152, 1–44.
  8. Cheng, N., Chen, Z., Sun, F., Sun, R., Dong, X., Xie, X., Xu, C., 2018. Ground ozone concentrations over Beijing from 2004 to 2015: variation patterns, indicative precursors and effects of emission reduction. Environ. Pollut. 237, 262–274.
  9. Debaje, S.B., 2014. Estimated crop yield losses due to surface O3 exposure and economic damage in India. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 21 (