Dergiler / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

Relationship Between Physical Activity Levels and Body Compositions of University Students

Sayfa
67–73
Yayın Tarihi
2019-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result, it can be said that there is no significant relationship between body composition variables and physical activity level variables of men and women participating in the research.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between physical activity levels and body composition of university students.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 155 students (56 women, 99 men) attending Selcuk University Faculty of Sports Sciences voluntarily participated in the research.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result, it can be said that there is no significant relationship between body composition variables and physical activity level variables of men and women participating in the research.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Physical Activity Level · Body Composition · Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between physical activity levels and body composition of university students. A total of 155 students (56 women, 99 men) attending Selcuk University Faculty of Sports Sciences voluntarily participated in the research. Body composition was determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis while the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)- short form was used to determine students' physical activity levels. According to the research findings, there was no correlation between body composition variables and physical activity level variables in men (p> 0,05), but there was only a weak but significant negative correlation between total physical activity score and height in women (p <0,05, r = -0.28). There was a significant relationship between the total score of high intensity physical activity and body weight (r = 0.21), body fat percentage (r = -0.21), lean body mass (r = 0.24), basal metabolic rate (r = 0.23), body mass index (r = 0.17) and waist / hip ratio (r = 0.24). Besides it was also determined that there was a significant relationship between total physical activity score and waist / hip ratio (r = 0.18). As a result, it can be said that there is no significant relationship between body composition variables and physical activity level variables of men and women participating in the research.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ARIKAN, Ş., REVAN, S. (2019). Relationship Between Physical Activity Levels and Body Compositions of University Students. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 67–73. https://ajindex.com/articles/205624

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Akova İ. 20 yaş üstü erişkinlerde uyku süresi, kalitesi, fiziksel aktivite düzeyi ve bazı antropometrik ölçümler arasındaki ilişkiler. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Halk Sağlığı Anabilim Dalı, Uzmanlık tezi, 2016
  2. Archer E, Blair SN. Physical activity and the prevention of cardiovascular disease: from evolution to epidemiology. Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 2011, 53(6):387-96
  3. Barlow CE, Shuval K, Balasubramanian BA, Kendzor DE, Radford NB, DeFina LF, Gabriel KP. Association between sitting time and cardiometabolic risk factors after adjustment for cardiorespiratory fitness, Cooper Center Longitudinal Study, 2010-2013. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016, 29(13): 181
  4. Bauman A, Ainsworth BE, Sallis JF, Hagströmer M, Craig CL, Bull FC, Pratt M, Venugopal K, Chau J, Sjöström M. The descriptive epidemiology of sitting. A 20-country comparison using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Am J Prev Med, 2011,41(2):228-35
  5. Bullock VE, Griffiths P, Sherar LB, Clemes SA. Sitting time and obesity in a sample of adults from Europe and the USA. Ann Hum Biol, 2017,44(3):230-236
  6. Burton NW, Turrell G. Occupation, hours worked and leisure-time physical activity. Prev Med. 2000, 31(6):673-81
  7. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep, 1985, 100(2):126-131
  8. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2003, 35(8):1381-95
  9. Dishman RA, Washburn RA, Schoeller DA. Measurement of Physical Activity, Quest 2012; 53:3, 295-309
  10. Dyrstad SM, Hansen BH, Holme IM, Anderssen SA. Comparison of self-reported versus accelerometer-measured physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2014, 46(1):99-106
  11. Fogelholm M, Kukkonen-Harjula K. Does physical activity prevent weight gain--a systematic review. Obes Rev, 2000, 1(2):95-111
  12. Hallal PC, Victora CG, Wells JC, Lima RC. Physical inactivity: prevalence and associated variables in Brazilian adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2003, 35(11):1894-900
  13. IPAQ. Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Short and long forms, 2005. Available from file:///C:/Users/asus/Downloads/scoring_protocol%20(1).pdf 14. Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Craig CL, Bouchar