KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2011 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Computer use of science teachers and their attitudes toward computer supported teaching: A sample from Turkey

GÜLFEM MUŞLU KAYGISIZ
Murat BAĞLIBEL
Mustafa SAMANCIOĞLU
Sayfa
78–90
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Findings were discussed in the framework of the related literature, and some suggestions were made.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to examine (i) science teachers‟ level of computer use, (ii) their attitudes toward Computer Supported Teaching (CST), and (iii) to investigate the correlation between science teachers‟ level of computer use and their attitudes toward CST. 75 female and 97 male totally 172 science teachers (91 science and technology, 26 physics, 26 chemistry, and 29 biology teachers) from 96 primary and secondary schools participated in the research during the 2008-2009 semester in Gaziantep, Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The data gathered were analyzed by SPSS 14 software.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Findings were discussed in the framework of the related literature, and some suggestions were made.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2008-2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine (i) science teachers‟ level of computer use, (ii) their attitudes toward Computer Supported Teaching (CST), and (iii) to investigate the correlation between science teachers‟ level of computer use and their attitudes toward CST. 75 female and 97 male totally 172 science teachers (91 science and technology, 26 physics, 26 chemistry, and 29 biology teachers) from 96 primary and secondary schools participated in the research during the 2008-2009 semester in Gaziantep, Turkey. Computer Supported Teaching Questionnaire was used to collect data. The questionnaire has three parts, which consists of demographic items, level of computer use items, and Attitude toward Computer Supported Teaching items. The data gathered were analyzed by SPSS 14 software. Cronbach‟s Alpha value was 0.93. Mean, standard deviation, and Pearson correlation analyses were used. Results indicated that science teachers‟ level of computer use was high and their attitudes toward CST were positive. There was a moderate positive correlation between teachers‟ computer use level and their attitudes toward CST. Findings were discussed in the framework of the related literature, and some suggestions were made.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAYGISIZ, G. M., BAĞLIBEL, M., SAMANCIOĞLU, M. (2011). Computer use of science teachers and their attitudes toward computer supported teaching: A sample from Turkey. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 78–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/205114

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Aiello, N. C. & Wolfe, L. M. (1980). A meta-analysis of individualized instruction in science Boston: American Educational Research Association. Akbaba-Altun, S. (2006). Complexity of integrating computer technologies into education in Turkey. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 176-187.
  2. Akçay, H., Tüysüz, C., & Feyzioğlu, B. (2003). Bilgisayar destekli fen bilgisi öğretiminin öğrenci baĢarısına ve tutumuna etkisine bir örnek: Mol kavramı ve Avogadro sayısı [A sample to effect on student attitude and success of computer assisted science teaching: Mol Cconcept and Avogadro number]. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(2), 57-66.
  3. Akkoyunlu, B. (1996). Öğrencilerin bilgisayara karĢı tutumları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 20(1), 15-29.
  4. Arslan, A. (2006). The attitude scale toward making computer supported education. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 24-33.
  5. Azarmsa, R. (1991). Educational Computing-Principles and Applications. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications. Bayraktar, S. (2002). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in science education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 173-188.
  6. Becker, H. J. (2000).
  7. Findings from the Teaching, Learning, and Computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51). Retrieved October 3, 2010, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n51/. Büyüköztürk, ġ. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliĢtirmede kullanımı [Factor analysis: Basic concepts and using to development scale]. Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 32, 470-483. Büyüköztürk, ġ. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (7.Baskı) [Data analysis handbook for social science- 7 Edition]. Ankara:
  8. PegemA Yayıncılık. Cavas, B. & Kesercioglu, T. (2003). Primary science teachers‟ attitudes toward computer assisted learning. Ege Journal of Education, 3(2), 35-43.
  9. Cavas, B., Cavas, P., Karaoğlan, B., & KıĢla, T. (2009). A study on science teachers' attitudes toward information and communication technologies in education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 20-33.
  10. Christensen, R. (2002). Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 411- 434. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Demircioğlu, H. & Geban, Ö. (1996). Comparing traditional problem so