KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2012 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Using herrmann whole brain teaching method to enhance students' motivation towards science learning

Ali Khalid Ali BAWANEH
Ahmad Nurulazam Md ZAIN
Salmiza SALEH
Abdul Ghani Kanesan ABDULLAH
Sayfa
3–22
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results also showed that the main effect of students' gender on the post test score of students' motivation towards science learning were not found statistically significant.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of Herrmann Whole Brain Teaching Method (HWBTM) to enhance eighth grade students' motivation towards science learning in Jordan.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The randomly selected sample (N=357) including students within the Bani Kananah Directorate of Education-Jordan.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results also showed that the main effect of students' gender on the post test score of students' motivation towards science learning were not found statistically significant.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of Herrmann Whole Brain Teaching Method (HWBTM) to enhance eighth grade students' motivation towards science learning in Jordan. The randomly selected sample (N=357) including students within the Bani Kananah Directorate of Education-Jordan. One hundred eighty-three (Male = 98, Female = 85) students were instructed using HWBTM whereas hundred seventy-four (Male = 82, Female = 92) students were taught how to use the conventional teaching method (CTM). Two instruments were developed: 1) Thinking Preference Questionnaire to classify participants based on their preferred thinking styles; and 2) Student’s Motivation towards Science Learning Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using a 2-way ANCOVA and Post Hoc with split file techniques and a significance threshold (α) of 0.05 using the SPSS software package. The results showed that HWBTM surpassed the CTM in enhancing students' motivation towards science learning. The results showed that there are no statistical significant differences amongst the students' preferred thinking styles across HWBTM on students' motivation towards science learning. However, there are differences across CTM. The results also showed that the main effect of students' gender on the post test score of students' motivation towards science learning were not found statistically significant.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAWANEH, A. K. A., ZAIN, A. N. M., SALEH, S., ABDULLAH, A. G. K. (2012). Using herrmann whole brain teaching method to enhance students' motivation towards science learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 3–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/203789

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Abu Mallouh, M. (2001). Why students rejoice when the school year ends, Journal of Educational Visions, Qatar Centre for Educational Research and Development, 4,113 to 124. Alaouneh, S. (2005). Motivation in psychology, theoretical and practical. (1st Ed.). Dar Al- Maserah, Amman, Jordan. Anderson, A., Hamilton, R., & Hattie, J. (2003). Classroom climate and motivated behaviour in secondary schools. Learning Environments Research, (7), 211-225.
  2. Bawaneh, A., Zain, A.N., & Salmiza, S. (2011). The Effect of Herrmann Whole Brain Teaching Method on Students' Understanding of Simple Electric Circuits. European Journal of Physics Education, 2(2), 1-23.
  3. Bawaneh, A., Zain, A.N., & Salmiza, S. (2010). Investigating students' preferable learning styles based on Herrmann's whole brain model for the purpose of developing new teaching method in modifying science misconceptions. Educational Research (ISSN: 2141-5161), International Research Journals, 1(9) 363-372.
  4. Baz, T., & Bawaneh, A. (2008). The effect of using conflict maps as an instructional tool in changing alternative conceptions of eight grade students in science in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. The Educational Journal. University of Kuwit, 87(22), 149–189.
  5. Brewster, C. & Fager, J. (2000).Northwest Regional Educational Libratory. Portland. http://www.nwrel.org/neguest/oct00/index.html.
  6. Cole, N. S. (1997). The ETS gender study: How females and males perform in education settings. Educational Testing Services. Princeton, NJ, USA. Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ, USA.Dunn, R. (2000). Learning styles: Theory, research, and practice. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 3-22.
  7. Evans, J. (2007). Understanding thinking.Custom Books Publishing. Felder, R. M. (1996). Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education, J. Coll. Sci. Teaching, 23(5), 286-290.
  8. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T., Franke, M., Levi, L., Jacobs, V., & Empson, S. (1998). New perspectives on gender differences in mathematics. Educational Researcher, 27(5), 4- 21. Garcia, T. (1995). The role of motivational strategies in self-regulated learning. New Directions for teaching and learning, 63, 29-42.
  9. Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students' attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86(5), 693-705.
  10. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2000). SP