KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2013 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Attitude towards science learning: An exploration of Pakistani students

Zubair Ahmad SHAH
Nasir MAHMOOD
Christine HARRISON
Sayfa
35–47
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Paternal education, occupation and students’ locality seems to causes no significant difference in attitudes towards science learning of students whereas maternal education and occupation cause significant difference in attitudes towards learning of science.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Attitude towards science has been a focus of study for many educational researchers and it ultimately helps to explore the aspects that can be intervened to enhance the students’ attitude towards science because a relationship has been reported between students’ attitude and science achievement.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A scale regarding attitude towards science learning (AtSL) with Cronbach’s alpha 0.86 was administered to 1233 students of 37 government schools of three districts.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Paternal education, occupation and students’ locality seems to causes no significant difference in attitudes towards science learning of students whereas maternal education and occupation cause significant difference in attitudes towards learning of science.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Attitude towards science has been a focus of study for many educational researchers and it ultimately helps to explore the aspects that can be intervened to enhance the students’ attitude towards science because a relationship has been reported between students’ attitude and science achievement. The variation in results reported by studies regarding attitude towards science and science learning reflect that the demographic variables might have influential effect on attitudes towards science and science learning. The purpose of this study was to explore the Pakistani students’ attitude towards science learning. A scale regarding attitude towards science learning (AtSL) with Cronbach’s alpha 0.86 was administered to 1233 students of 37 government schools of three districts. The results of this study reflect that attitude towards science learning increases with increase in grade of the students; and female students had higher attitude towards science learning than male students. Paternal education, occupation and students’ locality seems to causes no significant difference in attitudes towards science learning of students whereas maternal education and occupation cause significant difference in attitudes towards learning of science.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SHAH, Z. A., MAHMOOD, N., HARRISON, C. (2013). Attitude towards science learning: An exploration of Pakistani students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 35–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/199275

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Akar, M. S. (2007). Laboratuar dersinde yazma metinleri oluşturmanın ve ana kullanımının akademik başarıya etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi,
  2. Erzurum. Atila, M. E., Günel, M. & Büyükkasap E. (2010). Betimleme modlarının öğrenme amaçlı yazma aktiviteleri içerisindeki kullanım varyasyonlarının ilköğretim kuvvet ve hareket konularının öğrenimi üzerine etkisi. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(4), 113-127.
  3. Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. The psychology of education and instruction series. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Burke, K. A., Greenbowe, T. J., & Hand, B. (2005). Excerpts from the process of using inquiry and the science writing heuristic. Iowa State University. Retrieved May, 30, 2010, from http://avogadro.chem.iastate.edu/SWH/swhwkshpmanual.pdf.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, K. E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara:
  5. Pegem Akademi. Çalık, T. & Sezgin, F. (2005). Küreselleşme, bilgi toplumu ve eğitim. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 13(1), 55-66.
  6. Flower, L. & Hayes, J. (1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, 21–32. Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituting process. In D. Galbraith & M. Torrance (Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 139–160). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  7. Gözükara-Bağ, H. G., Karabulut, E. & Alpar, R. (2010). 2x2 Tablolarda gözlemciler/gözlemler arası uyumun değerlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(1), 46-52.
  8. Grimberg, B. I. & Hand, B. (2009). Cognitive Pathways: Analysis of students' written texts for science understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 503-521.
  9. Günel, M. (2009). Writing as a cognitive process and learning tool in elementary science education. Elementary Education Online, 8(1), 200-211.
  10. Günel, M., Atila, M. E. & Büyükkasap, E. (2009). Farklı betimleme modlarının öğrenme amaçlı yazma aktivitelerinde kullanımlarının 6. sınıf yaşamımızdaki elektrik ünitesinin öğrenimin etkisi. İlköğretim Online, 8 (1), 183-199.
  11. Günel, M., Kabataş-Memiş, E. & Büyükkasap, E. (2009). Öğrenme amaçlı yazma aktivitelerinin ve analoji kurmanın üniversite düzeyinde mekanik konularını öğrenmeye etkisinin incelenmesi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi, 29(2), 401-419.
  12. Günel, M., Kabataş-Memiş, E. & Büyükkasap, E. (2010). Yaparak yazarak bilim öğrenme- YYBÖ yaklaşımının ilköğretim öğre