Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2015 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

A Qualitative Inquiry about Students' Conceptualizations of Force Concept in terms of Ontological Categories

Sayfa
29–42
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The major problem emerged as the difficulty of situating every physics concept into the distinct ontological categories

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study was to inquire about students' conceptualizations of the force concept in terms of ontological categories.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Furthermore, the students did not consider ontological category shift a fruitful instructional strategy because of the possible problems they projected for the implementation.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The major problem emerged as the difficulty of situating every physics concept into the distinct ontological categories
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to inquire about students' conceptualizations of the force concept in terms of ontological categories. Although some of the literature have been providing supporting evidences about the fruitfulness of ontological categories for explaining the nature of students' alternative conceptions, some others provide strong arguments against it. To tap the controversial issues in the literature, an inquiry was conducted in a classroom context with students who were seeking a degree to become physics teachers. The data consist of four students' written responses to physics problems, reflections about their own conceptualizations from the theoretical perspective of ontological categories, and video recordings of classroom discussions. The analysis of data showed that a theory-driven interpretation (ontological categories) about students' conceptualizations of the force concept did not match with the students' own interpretations about their conceptualizations. Furthermore, the students did not consider ontological category shift a fruitful instructional strategy because of the possible problems they projected for the implementation. The major problem emerged as the difficulty of situating every physics concept into the distinct ontological categories

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZDEMİR, Ö. F. (2015). A Qualitative Inquiry about Students' Conceptualizations of Force Concept in terms of Ontological Categories. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 29–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/196399

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Chen, X. (2007). The Object Bias and the Study of Scientific Revolutions: Lessons from Developmental Psychology. Philosophical Psychology, 20, 4, 479-503.
  2. Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive Models of Science: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (pp. 129-186).
  3. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  4. Chi, M.T.H. (1997). Creativity: Shifting across ontological categories flexibly. In T.B. Ward, S.M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Conceptual Structures and processes: Emergence, Discovery and Change. (pp. 209-234).
  5. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association. Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 161-199.
  6. Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reframing the process of conceptual change: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 3-27).
  7. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Chi, M. T. H., & Slotta, J. D. (1993). The ontological coherence of intuitive physics. Commentary on A. diSessa's "Toward an epistemology of physics." Cognition and Instruction, 10, 249-260.
  8. Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27-43.
  9. Clark, D. B. (2006). Longitudinal Conceptual Change in Students' Understanding of Thermal Equilibrium: An Examination of the Process of Conceptual Restructuring. Cognition and Instruction, 24(4), 467-563 diSessa, A. (1983). Phenomenology and the evolution of intuition. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens(Eds.), Mental models (pp. 15-33).
  10. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. diSessa, A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49-70).
  11. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. diSessa, A. (1993a). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, (2&3), 105-225. diSessa, A. (1993b). Ontologies in Pieces: Response to Chi and Slotta. Cognition and Instruction, 10 (2&3), 272-280.
  12. Driver, R. (1989). Students' conceptions and learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 481-490.
  13. Ferrari, M. & Chi, M.T.H. (1998). The nature of naive explanations of natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1231-1256.
  14. Gupta, A., Hammer, D., & Redish