Dergiler / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

The Effects of Perceived Freedom in Leisure on Leisure Benefits: Students of The Faculty of Sports Science

Sayfa
208–213
Yayın Tarihi
2020-09-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Consequently, the research revealed that the levels of perceived freedom in leisure and leisure benefit do not differ based on socio-demographic characteristics and that the perceived freedom in leisure is an essential factor in participants' benefits.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to determine the differences between the levels of perceived freedom in leisure and the leisure benefits in terms of specific socio-demographic characteristics of the students studying in the faculty of sports sciences, the predictive power of the levels of the perceived freedom in leisure on their leisure benefit levels.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 318 participants, including 199 male and 119 female, studying in different sports sciences faculties selected by the convenience sampling method, constitute the sample.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Consequently, the research revealed that the levels of perceived freedom in leisure and leisure benefit do not differ based on socio-demographic characteristics and that the perceived freedom in leisure is an essential factor in participants' benefits.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Sports Science Faculty Students · Perceived Freedom in Leisure · Leisure Benefit

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences between the levels of perceived freedom in leisure and the leisure benefits in terms of specific socio-demographic characteristics of the students studying in the faculty of sports sciences, the predictive power of the levels of the perceived freedom in leisure on their leisure benefit levels. A total of 318 participants, including 199 male and 119 female, studying in different sports sciences faculties selected by the convenience sampling method, constitute the sample. In addition to the Personal Information Form, the “Perceived Freedom in Leisure Scale-25” developed by Witt and Ellis (34) and firstly adapted to Turkish by Lapa and Kaas (22) and the “Leisure Benefit Scale” developed by Ho (15) and adapted to Turkish by Akgül et al. (2) were used as data collecting tools in the study. Descriptive statistics, independent t-test, ANOVA, MANOVA, and regression analysis were adopted in the analysis of the data. The independent t-test results showed no significant difference between the levels of individuals' perceived leisure levels by their gender. The ANOVA results showed no difference between the participants' satisfaction status and the levels of perceived freedom in leisure per week. The MANOVA results showed that the effect of individuals’ gender, welfare status, and weekly leisure on their leisure benefit levels was not significant and that there were no statistical differences between the sub-dimensions. To the results of regression analysis, the perceived freedom in leisure is an important predictor of leisure benefit. Consequently, the research revealed that the levels of perceived freedom in leisure and leisure benefit do not differ based on socio-demographic characteristics and that the perceived freedom in leisure is an essential factor in participants' benefits.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SERDAR, E. (2020). The Effects of Perceived Freedom in Leisure on Leisure Benefits: Students of The Faculty of Sports Science. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 208–213. https://ajindex.com/articles/192047

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Ağyar E. Contribution of perceived freedom and leisure satisfaction to life satisfaction in a sample of Turkish women. Social İndicators Research, 2014; 116: 1-15
  2. Akgül BM, Ertüzün E, Karaküçük S. Leisure benefit scale: a study of validity and reliability. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2018; 23(1): 25-34
  3. Chen CC, Cheng CH, Lin SY. The relationship between leisure involvement, leisure benefits, and happiness of elementary schoolteachers in Tainan country. İnternational Research in Education, 2013; 1(1): 29-51
  4. Çuhadar A, Er Y, Demirel M, Demirel DH. Bireyleri rekreasyonel amaçlı egzersize motive eden faktörlerin incelenmesi. Spormetre, 2019; 17(3): 153-161
  5. Demirel DH, Demirel M, Serdar, E. University students’ opinions of the meaning of leisure and their perceived freedom ın leisure. Journal of Human Sciences, 2017; 14(1): 796-802
  6. Demirel M, Demirel, DH, Serdar, E. Constraints and perceived freedom levels ın the leisure of unıversity students. Journal of Human Sciences, 2017; 14(1): 789-795
  7. Doğan MN. Hukuk fakültesi öğrencilerinin rekreasyonel aktivitelerden elde ettikleri faydaların ve mutluluk düzeylerinin incelenmesi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans, Ankara. 2018
  8. Durhan, TA, Karaküçük S. Çocuklarıyla baby gym aktivitelerine katılan ebeveynlerin rekreasyon fayda düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2017; 2(4): 43-53
  9. Ellis GD, Witt PA. The measurement of perceived freedom in leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 1984; 16: 110-123
  10. Eskiler E, Yıldız Y, Ayhan C. The effect of leisure benefits on leisure satisfaction: Extreme sports. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 2019; 21(1): 16-20
  11. Gürbüz B, Çimen Z, Aydın İ. Serbest zaman ilgilenim ölçeği: Türkçe formu geçerlilik ve güvenirlilik çalışması. Spormetre, 2018; 16(4): 256-265
  12. Gürbüz B, Henderson K. Leisure activity preferences and constraints to leisure: perspectives from Turkey. World Leisure Journal, 2014; 56(4): 300-316
  13. Gürbüz S, Şahin F. Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Gözden geçirilmiş ve güncellenmiş 3. basım. Seçkin Yayıncılık: Ankara. 2016
  14. Harrington M. Practices and meaning of purposive family leisure among working- and middle-class families. Leisure Studies, 2014; 34(4): 471-486
  15. Ho TK. A study of leisure attitudes and benefits for senior high school students at ping-tung city and country in Taiwan (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). United State