KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 5

Impact of FDI and R&D on China's industrial CO2 emissions reduction and trend prediction

Yang YU
Xiao Wei XU
Sayfa
1627–1635
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The growth rate of FDI gradually decreased to less than 5%, while the R&D input will always be at an annual growth rate of more than 5% for a long period of time in the future.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this paper, we investigated the impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) and research as well as development (R&D) on industrial carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reduction.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Firstly, a Panel-Corrected Standard Error (PCSE) model was established based on Chinese provincial panel data during period of 2000–2017.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The growth rate of FDI gradually decreased to less than 5%, while the R&D input will always be at an annual growth rate of more than 5% for a long period of time in the future.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2000–2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

In this paper, we investigated the impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) and research as well as development (R&D) on industrial carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reduction. Firstly, a Panel-Corrected Standard Error (PCSE) model was established based on Chinese provincial panel data during period of 2000–2017. Secondly, a Grey Model (GM) was constructed to predict the growth trend of CO2 emissions, FDI and R&D in China from 2018 to 2030. It was deduced that: (1) FDI do bring negative effects on industrial CO2 emissions at the national level. From the perspective of regions, the coefficients of the eastern, central and western regions are all negatively correlated with CO2 emissions and pass the test of 1% significance level except the northeastern China. (2) In terms of R&D, it showed significantly improvement on CO2 emissions at the national and regional levels. Moreover, the efficiency of industrial CO2 emissions was improved by R&D with a rate of 27.2%, while the related value was increased by FDI with a rate of merely 4.3% at the national level. (3) According to the results of GM (1,1), China is expected to achieve zero growth of CO2 emissions by 2030. The growth rate of FDI gradually decreased to less than 5%, while the R&D input will always be at an annual growth rate of more than 5% for a long period of time in the future.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YU, Y., XU, X. W. (2019). Impact of FDI and R&D on China's industrial CO2 emissions reduction and trend prediction. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 5, 1627–1635. https://ajindex.com/articles/190688

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Ahmed, A., Uddin, G.S., Sohag, K., 2016. Biomass energy, technological progress and the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from selected European countries. Biomass Bioenergy 90, 202–208.
  2. Aliyu, M.A., 2005. Foreign direct investment and the environment: pollution haven hypothesis revisited. In: Paper Prepared for the Eight Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis. Arce, G., López, Antonio, Luis, Guan, D., 2016. Carbon Emissions Embodied in International Trade: the Post China Era. Applied Energy S030626191630681X. Beck, N., Katz, J.N., 2015. What to do (and not to do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 89 (3), 634–647.
  3. Cole, M.A., 2006. Does trade liberalization increase national energy use. Econ. Lett. 92, 108–112.
  4. Copeland, B.R., Taylor, M.S., 1994. North-south trade and the environment. Q. J. Econ. 109 (3). Crossman, G.M., Krueger, A.B., 1992. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Papers (2), 223–250.
  5. Deng, J.L., 1982. Control problems of grey systems. Syst. Contr. Lett. 1 (5). Deng, J.L., 1987. The Primary Methods of Grey System Theory. Hua zhong University of Science & Technology Press,
  6. Wuhan. Dong, Y., Ishikawa, M., Liu, X., et al., 2010. An analysis of the driving forces of CO2 emissions embodied in Japan–China trade. Energy Policy 38, 6784–6792.
  7. Dong, Y., Zhang, Z., Hong, W.C., 2018. A hybrid seasonal mechanism with a chaotic cuckoo search algorithm with a support vector regression model for electric load forecasting. Energies 11 (4), 1009. Fan, G.F., Peng, L.L., Hong, W.C., 2018. Short term load forecasting based on phase space reconstruction algorithm and bi-square kernel regression model. Appl. Energy 224, 13–33.
  8. Fisher-Vanden, K., Wing, I.S., 2008. Accounting for quality: issues with modeling the impact of R&D on economic growth and carbon emissions in developing economies. Energy Econ. 30 (6), 2771–2784.
  9. Garrone, P., Grilli, L., 2010. Is there a relationship between public expenditures in energy R&D and carbon emissions per GDP? An empirical investigation. Energy Policy 38 (10), 5600–5613.
  10. Grossman, G.M., Krueger, A.B., 1995. Economic growth and the environment. Q. J. Econ. 110 (2), 353–377.
  11. Guo, C.X., 2012. Impact of industrial structure changes on China's CO2 emissions. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 22 (7), 15–20.
  12. HenrIques, S.T., Borowiecki, K.J., 2017. The drivers of long-run CO2 emissions in Europe. North America and Japan since 1800. Energy Policy 101, 537–549.
  13. Hoffman, K., Parejo, M.