Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6

Comparative study of mesenchymal stem cells from rat bone marrow and adipose tissue

Sayfa
477–489
Yayın Tarihi
2018-12-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The present study demonstrates that MSCs derived from different tissues can be well expanded for the long term, although cells display gradually declined self-renewal and differentiation potentials to different extents depending on the tissue origins.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Several therapeutic products based on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been translated into clinical applications.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The long-term subculture made both types of cells smaller, weakened their colony-forming ability, and stimulated the proliferation rate.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The present study demonstrates that MSCs derived from different tissues can be well expanded for the long term, although cells display gradually declined self-renewal and differentiation potentials to different extents depending on the tissue origins.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Adipose tissue · bone marrow · comparative analysis

Abstract

Several therapeutic products based on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been translated into clinical applications. MSCs should undergo in vitro culture before a sufficient quantity can be achieved. Hence, both expansion kinetics and the biological characteristics of derived cells from primary culture are pertinent to their applications. In the present study, MSCs were isolated from rat bone marrow and adipose tissue (designated as bMSCs and aMSCs, respectively) and cells were comparatively analyzed regarding cell morphology, proliferation, colony formation, differentiation potential, and immunophenotype following the long-term subculture. No apparent differences could be noticed concerning the morphology between bMSCs and aMSCs. The long-term subculture made both types of cells smaller, weakened their colony-forming ability, and stimulated the proliferation rate. However, bMSCs demonstrated better proliferation and colony-forming ability than aMSCs. No significant difference was observed about the expression of some immunophenotypes (i.e. CD29+/CD90+/CD34-/CD45-) regardless of cell types or population doublings. Notably, bMSCs, but not aMSCs, maintained the differentiation potential well after the long-term subculture. The present study demonstrates that MSCs derived from different tissues can be well expanded for the long term, although cells display gradually declined self-renewal and differentiation potentials to different extents depending on the tissue origins.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HE, Q., YE, Z., ZHOU, Y., TAN, W. (2018). Comparative study of mesenchymal stem cells from rat bone marrow and adipose tissue. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6, 477–489. https://ajindex.com/articles/181617

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Anderson P, Cobo M, Martín F (2003). CD105 (endoglin)- negative murine mesenchymal stromal cells define a new multipotent subpopulation with distinct differentiation and immunomodulatory capacities. PLoS One 8: e76979. Bara JJ, Richards RG, Alini M, Stoddart MJ (2014). Concise review: bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells change phenotype following in vitro culture: implications for basic research and the clinic. Stem Cells 32: 1713-1723.
  2. Bianchi G, Banfi A, Mastrogiacomo M, Notaro R, Luzzatto L, Cancedda R, Quarto R (2003). Ex vivo enrichment of mesenchymal cell progenitors by fibroblast growth factor 2. Exp Cell Res 287: 98-105.
  3. Bortolotti F, Ukovich L, Razban V, Martinelli V, Ruozi G, Pelos B, Dore F, Giacca M, Zacchigna S (2015). In vivo therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stromal cells depends on the source and the isolation procedure. Stem Cell Rep 4: 332-339.
  4. Çelebi B, Elçin AE, Elçin YM (2009). Proteome analysis of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. J Proteome Res 8: 5217-5227.
  5. Çelebi B, Elçin YM (2009). Proteome analysis of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell subcultures. J Proteome Res 8: 2164- 2172. Chen JY, Mou XZ, Du XC, Xiang C (2015). Comparative analysis of biological characteristics of adult mesenchymal stem cells with different tissue origins. Asian Pac J Trop Med 8: 725- 731. Colter DC, Class R, Digirolamo CM, Prockop DJ (2000). Rapid expansion of recycling stem cells in cultures of plastic- adherent cells from human bone marrow. P Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 3213-3218.
  6. Deasy BM, Gharaibeh BM, Pollett JB, Jones MM, Lucas MA, Kanda Y, Huard J (2005). Long-term self-renewal of postnatal muscle-derived stem cells. Mol Biol Cell 16: 3323-3333.
  7. Dijk CGMV, Nieuweboer FE, Jia YP, Yan JX, Burgisser P, Mulligen EV, Azzouzi HE, Duncker DJ, Verhaar MC, Cheng C (2015). The complex mural cell: pericyte function in health and disease. Int J Cardiol 190: 75-89.
  8. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, Deans R, Keating A, Prockop D, Horwitz E (2009). Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 8: 315-317.
  9. Dos Santos F, Andrade PZ, Da SC, Cabral J (2013). Bioreactor design for clinical-grade expansion of stem cells. Biotechnol J 8: 644- 654. Dos Santos F, Campbell A, Fernandes-Platzgummer A, Andrade PZ, Gimble JM, Wen Y, Boucher S, Vemuri MC, Silva CLD, Cabral JMS (2014). A xenogeneic-free biorea