Dergiler / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2019 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

THE PARAMETRIC AND NON-PARAMETRIC STABILITY ANALYSES FOR INTERPRETING GENOTYPE BY ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION OF SOME SOYBEAN GENOTYPES

Sayfa
28–38
Yayın Tarihi
2019-06-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The coefficient of regression (bi) had positively significant associated with CVi, αi, Si(3) and Si(6) (P<0.01) and with the superiority parameter (TOP) (P<0.05).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Seed yields of 15 soybean genotypes were evaluated in three locations i.e.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bursa, Samsun and Konya under main crop conditions through summer seasons from 2014 to 2016.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The coefficient of regression (bi) had positively significant associated with CVi, αi, Si(3) and Si(6) (P<0.01) and with the superiority parameter (TOP) (P<0.05).
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Adaptability · genotype by environment interaction · seed yield

Abstract

Seed yields of 15 soybean genotypes were evaluated in three locations i.e. Bursa, Samsun and Konya under main crop conditions through summer seasons from 2014 to 2016. The used design was a randomized complete block design with four replications. This research is aimed to estimate the stability parameters of seed yield of 15 soybean genotypes by used different stability analysis methods over nine environmental conditions and to study interrelationship among these stability methods. Genotypes, environments and genotype by environment interactions (GEI) played a significant role in terms of seed yield in this study. The genotypes KAMD 03, BATEM 306, BDUS 04, ARISOY and ATAEM 07 had higher seed yields and regression coefficient values above 1.0. These genotypes are sensitive to environmental variations and would be suggested for cultivation under favourable conditions, whereas KAMD 01, KASM 02 and KASM 03 with bi<1 and lowest average yields were poorly adapted across unfavourable environment conditions. The genotype BDSA 05 having regression coefficient below 1.0 and higher seed yield than average yield were goodly adapted to unfavourable environment conditions. The results of most parametric and non-parametric stability analyses showed that genotypes BDUS 04, KASM 02, KASM 03, KAMD 03 and BDSA 05 were stable genotypes. These genotypes were demonstrated superior adaptability with high yield performances in many environments. Results of correlation analysis indicated that seed yield was significantly correlated with Ri2 (P<0.05), Si(3) (P<0.05), Di (P<0.01), Si(6) (P<0.01), TOP (P<0.01) and showed a negative and significant correlation with Pi and RS (P<0.01). The coefficient of regression (bi) had positively significant associated with CVi, αi, Si(3) and Si(6) (P<0.01) and with the superiority parameter (TOP) (P<0.05).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GOKSOY, A. T., SINCIK, M., ERDOGMUS, M., ERGIN, M., AYTAC, S., GUMUSCU, G., GUNDUZ, O., KELES, R., BAYRAM, G., SENYIGIT, E. (2019). THE PARAMETRIC AND NON-PARAMETRIC STABILITY ANALYSES FOR INTERPRETING GENOTYPE BY ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION OF SOME SOYBEAN GENOTYPES. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 28–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/181060

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Ablett, G.R., R.I. Buzzell, W.D. Beversdorf, O.B. Allen. 1994.Comparative stability of indeterminate and semi determinate soybean lines. Crop Sci. 34(2): 347-351.
  2. Allard, R.W. 1960. Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Newyork. Akcura, M., Y. Kaya. 2008. Non-parametric stability methods for interpreting genotype by environment interaction of bread wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) Genetics and Molecular Biology 31(4): 906-913.
  3. Akcura, M., Y. Kaya, S. Taner. 2009. Evaluation of durum wheat genotypes using parametric and non parametric stability statistics. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 14(2): 111-122.
  4. Al-Assily, Kh. A., S.R. Saleeb, S.H. Mansour, M.S. Mohamed. 2002. Stability parameters for soybean genotypes as criteria for response to environmental conditions. Minufia Journal of Agric Res. 27(2): 169-180.
  5. Bakal, H., L. Gulluoglu, B. Onat, H. Arioglu. 2017. The effect of growing season on some agronomic and quality characteristics of soybean varieties in mediterranean region in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 22(2): 187-196.
  6. Becker, H.C., J. Leon. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed. 101:1-23.
  7. Carvalho, C.G.P., C.A.A. Arıas, J.F.F. De Toledo, L.A. De Almeida, R.A. De Kiihl, M.F. Oliveira, D.M. Hiromoto, C. Takeda. 2003. Proposta de classificação dos coeficientes de variação em relação à produtividade e altura da planta de soja. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 38(2): 187-193.
  8. Chandrakar, P.K., S. Rajeev, S.K. Agrawal, S.S. Rao, R. Shrivastava. 1998. Stability analysis of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties in rice zone of Madhya. Pradesh Journal of Oilseeds Res. 15: 247-249.
  9. Chaudhary, K.R., Wu, J. 2012. Stability analysis for yield and seed quality of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] across different environments in Eastern South Dakota. Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture, Kansas State University. Crossa, J. 1990. Statistical analyses of multi-location trials. Advances in Agron. 44: 55-85.
  10. Duarte, J.B., R. Vencovsky. 1999. Interac¸a˜o geno´tipos·ambientes: Uma Introduc¸a˜o a` Ana´lise ‘‘AMMI’’ Se´rie Monografias, n 9. Ribeira˜o Preto, Sociedade Brasileira de Gene´tica, 60p Eberhart, S.A., W.A. Russell. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6: 36-40.
  11. EL-Refaey, R.A., E.H. EL-Seidy, M.A. El-Borai, T.M. Abu Sein. 2013. Phenotypic stability parameters of yield for some soybean genotypes. Egypt Journal of Plant Breed. 17(2): 455-466.
  12. Finlay, K.W., G.N. Wilkinson