Dergiler / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2019 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

STABILITY AND ADAPTABILITY OF SORGHUM HYBRIDS ELUCIDATED WITH GENOTYPE–ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION BIPLOTS

Sayfa
155–163
Yayın Tarihi
2019-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results of which-won-where biplots showed that Lasani was the best general hybrid at both locations, whereas YSH-95 was the best hybrid for the specific environmental conditions at MMRI.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was conducted to compare the performance of ten sorghum hybrids at two locations (Maize and Millets Research Institute, Yusafwala, Sahiwal, MMRI) & Sorghum Research Sub-Station, Dera Gazi Khan, D.G.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Khan) for two consecutive years (2015 and 2016), i.e. in a total of four environments (MMRI-15, MMRI-16, DG Khan-15 and DG Khan-16).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results of which-won-where biplots showed that Lasani was the best general hybrid at both locations, whereas YSH-95 was the best hybrid for the specific environmental conditions at MMRI.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Brix value · correlation · Maize and Millets Research Institute

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the performance of ten sorghum hybrids at two locations (Maize and Millets Research Institute, Yusafwala, Sahiwal, MMRI) & Sorghum Research Sub-Station, Dera Gazi Khan, D.G. Khan) for two consecutive years (2015 and 2016), i.e. in a total of four environments (MMRI-15, MMRI-16, DG Khan-15 and DG Khan-16). The experiment was conducted in a Randomized Complete Block Design with a plot size of 4 × 0.75 × 2 m. In all four environments the crop was sown in July and harvested in December. Five plants were selected randomly from each plot for data collection. The following ranges were determined in the investigated traits; grain yield (2858.34-5266.33 kg ha-1), fodder yield (28663-45667 kg ha-1), days to 50% anthesis (76-81 days) and Brix value (8.28 -18.42). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) estimates, generated by the biplot software were used for data interpretation. It was found that the influence of genotype, environment and G × E interaction was significant (P<0.05) for all traits in all environments. The data for all traits except Brix value were useful for further study. For grain yield and fodder yield, hybrid YSH-95 was the most suitable due to its higher yield and better stability. Sorghum Research Sub-Station Dera Gazi Khan (DG Khan), a non-discriminating location, were considered suitable for generally adapted hybrids and Maize and Millets Research Institute, Yusafwala, Sahiwal (MMRI), a more discriminating location, were considered best for specifically adapted hybrids. The results of which-won-where biplots showed that Lasani was the best general hybrid at both locations, whereas YSH-95 was the best hybrid for the specific environmental conditions at MMRI.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MUMTAZ, A., HUSSAIN, D., SAEED, M., ARSHAD, M., YOUSAF, M. İ. (2019). STABILITY AND ADAPTABILITY OF SORGHUM HYBRIDS ELUCIDATED WITH GENOTYPE–ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION BIPLOTS. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 155–163. https://ajindex.com/articles/180719

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Ali, S. 2011. Economic losses due to delayed conception in dairy animals of small farmers in district Gujranwala. M.Sc. (Hons) Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Economics & Rural Sociology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan. icdd.uaf.edu.pk/Publications/011.pdf (Accessed April 14, 2018).
  2. Ayub, M., A. Tanveer, M.A. Nadeem and S.M.A. Shah. 2004. Studies on the Fodder Yield and Quality of Sorghum Grown Alone and in Mixture with Ricebean. Pak. J. Life Soc. Sci. 2(1): 46-48.
  3. Bibi, A., H.A. Sadaqat, H.M. Akram and M.I. Mohammed. 2010. Physiological markers for screening sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) germplasm under water stress condition. Intl. J. Agri. Bio. 12(3):451-455.
  4. Cifuentes, R., R. Bressani and C. Rolz. 2014. The potential of sweet sorghum as a source of ethanol and protein. Energy for Sustain. Develop. 21:13–19.
  5. Crossa, J., P.N. Fox, W.H. Pfeiffer, S. Rajaram and H.G. Gauch. 1991. AMMI adjustment for statistical analysis of an international wheat yield trial. Theo. Applied Genet. 81:27–37.
  6. Dehghani, H., A. Ebadi and A. Yousefi. 2006. Biplot analysis of genotype by environment interaction for barley yield in Iran. Agron. J. 98:388–393.
  7. Dehghani, H., H. Omidi and N. Sabaghnia. 2008. Graphic analysis of trait relations of rapeseed using the biplot method. Agron. J. 100:1443–1449.
  8. Dhar, S., S.D. Gupta, S.N. Tripathi and S.K. Rai. 2005. Production potential of fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) varieties under different nitrogen levells and sowing dates. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 75 (9): 572-575.
  9. Fan, X.M., M.S. Kang, H. Chen, Y. Zhang, J. Tan and C. Xu. 2007. Yield stability of maize hybrids evaluated in multi-environment trials in Yunnan, China. Agron. J. 99:220-228. FAOSTAT. 2017.
  10. Food and Agriculture Organization, United States. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home.
  11. Gauch, H.G. 1988. Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometr. 44:705–715.
  12. Gauch, H.G., and R.W. Zobel. 1997. Identifying mega-environment and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37:381–385.
  13. Gauch, H.G. 1992. Statistical analysis of regional yield trials: AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 53–110. Government of Pakistan. 2016-17. Economic Survey of Pakistan. Finance Division, Economic Advisory Wing, Islamabad. Pakistan. Ilker, E., H. Geren, R. Unsal, I. Sevin, F. Aykut tonk and M. Tosun. 2011. AMMI-Biplot analysis of yield performances of bread wheat cultivars grown at different locatio