Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2011 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3

Interactions between rural migration and land use change in the forest villages in the Gökçay Watershed

Sayfa
247–257
Yayın Tarihi
2011-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The population of the watershed area was 5561 in 1935, however, dropping by 73.2%, it fell to 1486 according to data in the latest census of 2007.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was carried out to analyze the spatial and temporal pattern of land use/land cover change (from 1955 to 2008) and migration movement (from 1935 to 2007) in the Gökçay River Watershed.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To assess this period, the necessary data were obtained from forest stand maps (1955 and 2008) and evaluated by using Geographic Information Systems.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The population of the watershed area was 5561 in 1935, however, dropping by 73.2%, it fell to 1486 according to data in the latest census of 2007.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Key words: Land use · mountainous forest villages · rural migration

Özet

This study was carried out to analyze the spatial and temporal pattern of land use/land cover change (from 1955 to 2008) and migration movement (from 1935 to 2007) in the Gökçay River Watershed. To assess this period, the necessary data were obtained from forest stand maps (1955 and 2008) and evaluated by using Geographic Information Systems. Maps of the study area dated 1955 and 2008 have been analyzed, and land use type and change on the land pattern have been investigated. The data reveal that the percentage of forest area, which was 47% in 1955, rose to 50% in 2008; the percentage of rangeland area increased from 2% to 7%, and the percentage of agricultural area went up from 25% to 27%. The percentage of degraded forest area was 1% in 1955 and increased to 2% in 2008. The biggest change was observed in the forest opening areas. Forest openings decreased from 24% to 12%. These areas have been converted to forest, agricultural, and settlement areas. The population of the watershed area was 5561 in 1935, however, dropping by 73.2%, it fell to 1486 according to data in the latest census of 2007.

Abstract

This study was carried out to analyze the spatial and temporal pattern of land use/land cover change (from 1955 to 2008) and migration movement (from 1935 to 2007) in the Gökçay River Watershed. To assess this period, the necessary data were obtained from forest stand maps (1955 and 2008) and evaluated by using Geographic Information Systems. Maps of the study area dated 1955 and 2008 have been analyzed, and land use type and change on the land pattern have been investigated. The data reveal that the percentage of forest area, which was 47% in 1955, rose to 50% in 2008; the percentage of rangeland area increased from 2% to 7%, and the percentage of agricultural area went up from 25% to 27%. The percentage of degraded forest area was 1% in 1955 and increased to 2% in 2008. The biggest change was observed in the forest opening areas. Forest openings decreased from 24% to 12%. These areas have been converted to forest, agricultural, and settlement areas. The population of the watershed area was 5561 in 1935, however, dropping by 73.2%, it fell to 1486 according to data in the latest census of 2007.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÖL, C., ÖZDEN, S., YILMAZ, H. (2011). Interactions between rural migration and land use change in the forest villages in the Gökçay Watershed. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3, 247–257. https://ajindex.com/articles/180371

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Berry MW, Flamm RO, Hazen BC, MacIntyre RL (1995) Th e Land Use Change Analysis System (LUCAS) for evaluating landscape management decisions, IEEE Computational Science and Engineering 3: 24-35.
  2. Blaikie P, Brookfi eld H (1997) Questions from history in the Mediterranean and Western Europe, In: Blaikie P, Brookfi eld H. (Eds.), Land Degradation and Society. Methuen, London, pp. 122-142.
  3. Carlsson G, Maathai W, Honglie S, Hvidt N, Cropper A, Aigrain J, El-Ashry M, Narain S, Lash J, Johnson I, Petit B, Wahlström M, Sokona Y (2008) Climate Change and Drylands Commission on climate change and development. International Institute for Environmental Development, March 2008,
  4. Sweden. Doygun H, Alphan H (2006) Monitoring urbanization of İskenderun, Turkey, and its negative implications. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 114: 145-155.
  5. GDF (1955) General Directorate of Forestry (GDF), Regional Directorate of Ankara,
  6. Forest District Directorate of Ilgaz, Management Plan of Forest Sub-district of Yenice. GDF (2008) 1996-2015, General Directorate of Forestry (GDF), Regional Directorate of Ankara,
  7. Forest District Directorate of Ilgaz, Management Plan of Forest Sub-district of Yenice. Göl C (2007) Arazi kullanım türü ile toprak organik karbon depolama arasındaki ilişkiler, I. Türkiye İklim Değişikliği Kongresi – TİKDEK 2007, İstanbul, pp. 411-419.
  8. Göl C, Çakır M, Ediş S, Yılmaz H (2010) Th e eff ects of land use/land cover change and demographic processes (1950-2008) on soil properties in the Gökçay Catchment, Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research 4: 1670-1677.
  9. Gür TH, Ural E (2004) Türkiye’de kentlere göçün nedenleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 22: 23-38.
  10. Grime JP (1997) Climate change and vegetation. In: Plant Ecology. 2nd ed, Crawley MJ (ed.). Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK; pp. 582-594.
  11. Hartemink, AE, Veldkamp T, Bai Z (2008) Land cover change and fertility decline in Tropical Regions. Turk. J. Agric. For. 32: 195- 213. Hillel D (1991) Out of the Earth: Civilization and the Life of the Soil. University of California Press,
  12. Berkeley. Kamusoko C, Aniya M (2007) Land use/cover change and landscape fragmentation analysis in the Bindura District, Zimbabwe. Land Degradation & Development 18: 221-233.
  13. Karanth KK, Curran LM, Reuning-Scherer JD (2006) Village size and forest disturbance in Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, India. Biological Conservation 128: 147-157.
  14. Kılıç Ş, Şenol S, Evrendilek F (2003) Evaluation