Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2011 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1

Micropropagation of the apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cv. Hacıhaliloğlu by means of single node culture

Sayfa
55–64
Yayın Tarihi
2011-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Hacıhaliloğlu from adult plants.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Hacıhaliloğlu is one of the most widely cultivated apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars in Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:During this study significant differences in harvesting dates were observed, with the month of May being noted as the best time to examine the in vitro culture of Hacıhaliloğlu.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Hacıhaliloğlu from adult plants.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Key words: Apricot · Hacıhaliloglu · micropropagation

Özet

Hacıhaliloğlu is one of the most widely cultivated apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars in Turkey. It produces fruit of excellent quality and is consumed both fresh and dried. In this study several factors affecting in vitro culture, rapid proliferation, rooting, and acclimatization of the apricot cultivar Hacıhaliloğlu were examined. During this study significant differences in harvesting dates were observed, with the month of May being noted as the best time to examine the in vitro culture of Hacıhaliloğlu. The effects of the cytokinin 6-benzylaminopurine (BA), kinetin (Kin), and thidiazuron (TDZ) were evaluated individually, and different concentrations of BA were also tested. BA levels were tested for their effects on shoot proliferation and 1.0 mg L-1 of BA was the most suitable dose for promoting shoot multiplication cultures. The greatest number of shoots (3.42 ± 0.19) was obtained using 2.0 mg L-1 of BA; this was significantly greater than that of the control, but there was no significant difference in the mean obtained with 1 mg L-1 of BA. The effect of a carbon source on shoot proliferation was studied by using glucose, sucrose, fructose, and lactose at the 3.0% concentration. Sucrose resulted in better shoot proliferation than the other sugar varieties tested. The best rooting percentage was obtained on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 2.0 mg L-1 of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA). The regenerated plants were successfully transferred to soil. Herein a simple and effective method is reported for the micropropagation of the apricot cv. Hacıhaliloğlu from adult plants.

Abstract

Hacıhaliloğlu is one of the most widely cultivated apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars in Turkey. It produces fruit of excellent quality and is consumed both fresh and dried. In this study several factors affecting in vitro culture, rapid proliferation, rooting, and acclimatization of the apricot cultivar Hacıhaliloğlu were examined. During this study significant differences in harvesting dates were observed, with the month of May being noted as the best time to examine the in vitro culture of Hacıhaliloğlu. The effects of the cytokinin 6-benzylaminopurine (BA), kinetin (Kin), and thidiazuron (TDZ) were evaluated individually, and different concentrations of BA were also tested. BA levels were tested for their effects on shoot proliferation and 1.0 mg L-1 of BA was the most suitable dose for promoting shoot multiplication cultures. The greatest number of shoots (3.42 ± 0.19) was obtained using 2.0 mg L-1 of BA; this was significantly greater than that of the control, but there was no significant difference in the mean obtained with 1 mg L-1 of BA. The effect of a carbon source on shoot proliferation was studied by using glucose, sucrose, fructose, and lactose at the 3.0% concentration. Sucrose resulted in better shoot proliferation than the other sugar varieties tested. The best rooting percentage was obtained on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 2.0 mg L-1 of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA). The regenerated plants were successfully transferred to soil. Herein a simple and effective method is reported for the micropropagation of the apricot cv. Hacıhaliloğlu from adult plants.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILDIRIM, H., ONAY, A., TİLKAT, E., AKTÜRK, Z. (2011). Micropropagation of the apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cv. Hacıhaliloğlu by means of single node culture. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1, 55–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/180257

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Al-Maarri K, Arnaud Y, Miginiac E (1994) Micropropagation ofPyrus comminus cultivar Passe Crassane seedlings and cultivar Williams: Factor affecting root formation in vitro and ex vitro. Sci Hort 58: 207-214.
  2. Asma BM (2000) Kayısı yetiştiriciliği. Evin matbaası. Malatya. p. 243 Balla I, Vertesy J (2001) In vitro culture of Hungarian apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) varieties. Acta Hort 560: 395-398.
  3. Burgos L, Alburquerque N (2003) Ethylene inhibitors and low kanamycin concentrations improve adventitious regeneration from apricot leaves. Plant Cell Reports 21: 1167-1174.
  4. FAO (2007) Food and agriculture organization the United Nations, statistical database (www.fao.org). Gentile A, Monticelli S, Damiano C (2002) Adventitious shoot regeneration in peach (Prunus persica L.) Batsch. Plant Cell Reports 20: 1011-1016.
  5. Hammerschlag FA (1986) Temperate fruits and nuts. in: Tissue culture as a plant production system for horticultural crops. (Eds. Hammerschlag, FA et al.) Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, p: 221-236.
  6. Hokanson KE, Pooler MR (2000) Regeneration of ornamental cherry (Prunus) taxa from mature stored seed. HortScience 35: 745- 748. Koubouris G, Vasilikakis M (2006) Improvement of in vitro propagation of apricot cultivars “Bebecou”. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 85: 173-180.
  7. Kramarenko LA (1999) Micropropagation of apricot and field performance of in vitro propagated plants. Acta Hort 488: 417- 420. Mante S, Scorza R, Cordts JM (1989) Plant regeneration from cotyledons ofPrunus persica, Prunus domestica and Prunus cerasus. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Cult 19: 1-11.
  8. Marino G, Bertazza G, Magnanini E, Altan ED (1993) Comparative effects of sorbitol and sucrose as main carbon energy sources in micropropagation of apricot. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 34: 235-244.
  9. Marino G, Magnanini E, Battistini S, Righetti B (1991) Effect of hormones and main carbon energy sources on in vitro propagation of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cvs. “Sancastrese” and “Portici”. Acta Hort 293: 355-361.
  10. Murai Y, Harada H, Yamashita H (1997) In vitro propagation of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cv. “Bakuoh Junkyou”. J of the Jap Soc for Hort Sci 66: 475-480.
  11. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473- 497. Paris R, Pratesi D, Negri P (2004) In vitro morphogenic ability of mature or embriyogenic apricot tissue. Acta Hort 663: 487-490.
  12. Perez-Tornero O, Burgos L (2000) Different me