Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1

Effects of different organic materials on forage yield and quality of silage maize (Zea mays L.)

Sayfa
23–31
Yayın Tarihi
2014-05-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The combined use of organic materials with inorganic fertilizers instead of a conventional fertilization regime may be effective in maintaining forage supply but N-based treatments have the risk of restricting forage production from silage maize.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was conducted at the experimental area of the Field Crops Department of Çukurova University (37°01'N, 35°18'E) in the 2010 and 2011 growing seasons to determine the effects of sole or combined applications of 3 organic materials (poultry litter, cattle manure, and leonardite) with supplemental inorganic fertilizer on the forage yield and quality of silage maize.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The field trial was arranged in a complete randomized block design with 3 replications.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The combined use of organic materials with inorganic fertilizers instead of a conventional fertilization regime may be effective in maintaining forage supply but N-based treatments have the risk of restricting forage production from silage maize.
🔬Tür:Deneysel Tarla Denemesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Key words: Cattle manure · leonardite · organic material

Özet

This study was conducted at the experimental area of the Field Crops Department of Çukurova University (37°01'N, 35°18'E) in the 2010 and 2011 growing seasons to determine the effects of sole or combined applications of 3 organic materials (poultry litter, cattle manure, and leonardite) with supplemental inorganic fertilizer on the forage yield and quality of silage maize. The field trial was arranged in a complete randomized block design with 3 replications. Poultry litter (PL) and cattle manure (CM) were applied based on P or N requirements (PL-P, PL-N, CM-P, and CM-N) of the crop, whereas leonardite was applied in only 1 dose (500 kg ha-1) and was also combined with 3 inorganic fertilizer doses (100%, 75%, and 50% of the recommended inorganic fertilizer dose, called LEO-100, LEO-75, and LEO-50, respectively). The results show that the highest values of dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) yields (18.3 t ha-1 and 1652 kg ha-1, respectively) were observed in LEO-100, whereas the lowest (11.2 t ha-1 and 758 kg ha-1, respectively) were observed in PL-N. In terms of forage quality parameters (CP, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and relative feed value), the P-based poultry litter and cattle manure treatments (PL-P and CM-P) gave similar results to conventional fertilization treatment, whereas the N-based treatments (PL-N and CM-N) significantly decreased forage quality. The combined use of organic materials with inorganic fertilizers instead of a conventional fertilization regime may be effective in maintaining forage supply but N-based treatments have the risk of restricting forage production from silage maize.

Abstract

This study was conducted at the experimental area of the Field Crops Department of Çukurova University (37°01'N, 35°18'E) in the 2010 and 2011 growing seasons to determine the effects of sole or combined applications of 3 organic materials (poultry litter, cattle manure, and leonardite) with supplemental inorganic fertilizer on the forage yield and quality of silage maize. The field trial was arranged in a complete randomized block design with 3 replications. Poultry litter (PL) and cattle manure (CM) were applied based on P or N requirements (PL-P, PL-N, CM-P, and CM-N) of the crop, whereas leonardite was applied in only 1 dose (500 kg ha-1) and was also combined with 3 inorganic fertilizer doses (100%, 75%, and 50% of the recommended inorganic fertilizer dose, called LEO-100, LEO-75, and LEO-50, respectively). The results show that the highest values of dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) yields (18.3 t ha-1 and 1652 kg ha-1, respectively) were observed in LEO-100, whereas the lowest (11.2 t ha-1 and 758 kg ha-1, respectively) were observed in PL-N. In terms of forage quality parameters (CP, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and relative feed value), the P-based poultry litter and cattle manure treatments (PL-P and CM-P) gave similar results to conventional fertilization treatment, whereas the N-based treatments (PL-N and CM-N) significantly decreased forage quality. The combined use of organic materials with inorganic fertilizers instead of a conventional fertilization regime may be effective in maintaining forage supply but N-based treatments have the risk of restricting forage production from silage maize.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

NAZLI, R. İ., KUŞVURAN, A., İNAL, İ., DEMİRBAŞ, A., TANSI, V. (2014). Effects of different organic materials on forage yield and quality of silage maize (Zea mays L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1, 23–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/180139

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Achieng JO, Ouma G, Odhiambo G, Muyekho F (2010). Effect of farmyard manure and inorganic fertilizers on maize production on alfisols and ultisols in Kakamega, western Kenya. Agric Biol J N Am 1: 430–439.
  2. Adeli A, Sistani KR, Rowe DE, Tewolde H (2007). Effects of broiler litter applied to no-till and tillage cotton on selected soil properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71: 974–983.
  3. Akıncı S, Büyükkeskin T, Eroğlu A, Erdoğan BE (2009). The effect of humic acid on nutrient composition in broad bean (Vicia faba L.) Roots Not Sci Biol 1: 81–87.
  4. Akinremi OO, Janzen HH, Lemke RL, Larney FJ (2000). Response of canola, wheat and green beans to leonardite additions. Can J Soil Sci 437–443.
  5. Ayoola OT, Adeniyan ON (2006). Influence of poultry manure and NPK fertilizer on yield and yield components of crops under different cropping systems in southwest Nigeria. Afr J Biotechnol 5: 1386–1392.
  6. Bao X, Watanabe M, Wang Q, Hayashı S, Liu J (2006). Nitrogen budgets of agricultural fields of the Changjiang River basin from 1980 to 1990. Sci Total Environ 363: 136–148.
  7. Barton I, Schipper IA (2001). Regulation of nitrous oxide emissions from soils irrigated with dairy farm effluent. J Environ Qual 30: 1881–1887.
  8. Çarman K, Konak M, Sade B, Şeker C, Soylu S, Özbek O, Gümüş I (2010). Ayırma Prosesi ile Ayrıştırılmış Katı ve Sıvı Ahır Gübresinin Farklı Uygulama Şekillerinin Toprak Özellikleri ve Mısır Verimine Etkileri Project No: 106 O 691. uvt.ulakbim. gov.tr. (in Turkish). Chadwick DR, Pain BF, Brookman SKE (2000). Nitrous oxide and methane emissions following application of animal manures to grassland. J Environ Qual 29: 277–287.
  9. Chen Y, Aviad T (1990). Effect of humic substances on plant growth. In: P. MacCarthy, editor. Humic Substances in Soil and Crop Sciences: Selected Readings. Madison, WI USA: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 161–186.
  10. Cherney DJR, Cox WJ (1992). Corn forage fiber composition and in vitro digestibility as influenced by nitrogen fertilization. In: Proceedings of the American Forage and Grass Council, pp. 81– Codling EE, Chaney RL, Mulchi CL (2008). Effects of broiler litter management practices on phosphorus, copper, zinc, manganese, and arsenic concentrations in Maryland coastal plain soils. Commun Soil Sci Plan 39: 1193–1205.
  11. Duplessis GL, MacKenzie FA (1983). Effects of leonardite applications on phosphorus availability and corn growth. Can J Soil Sci 63: 749–751.
  12. Ece A, Saltalı K, Eryiğit N, Uysal F (2007). The effects of leonardite applications on climbing