Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2011 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Determination of the effect of biodiesel use on power take-off performance characteristics of an agricultural tractor in a test laboratory

Sayfa
103–113
Yayın Tarihi
2011-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was concluded that B20 (20% biodiesel + 80% petrodiesel) could be a more efficient alternative to petrodiesel fuel.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Tractor performance tests conducted under laboratory test conditions are important because these tests determine the performance characteristics used to compare strengths and weaknesses of tractors.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The objective of this study was to determine the effect of diesel fuel (B0) and 3 different biodiesel blends made of canola oil (B10, B20, B30) on tractor power take-off (PTO) performance characteristics.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was concluded that B20 (20% biodiesel + 80% petrodiesel) could be a more efficient alternative to petrodiesel fuel.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Key words: Tractor · power take-off · performance characteristics

Özet

Tractor performance tests conducted under laboratory test conditions are important because these tests determine the performance characteristics used to compare strengths and weaknesses of tractors. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of diesel fuel (B0) and 3 different biodiesel blends made of canola oil (B10, B20, B30) on tractor power take-off (PTO) performance characteristics. Performance characteristics studied were PTO power, engine torque, engine fuel consumption, and specific fuel consumption on an agricultural tractor (Massey Ferguson 3056 2WD) at the test laboratory of the Directorate of Agricultural Machinery Test Center (TAMTEST), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ankara, Turkey. The maximum PTO power (32.35 ± 0.06 kW), the minimum specific fuel consumption (288.72 ± 0.11 g Kw-1 h-1), and the minimum fuel consumption (11.08 ± 0.13 L h-1) were achieved by using B20 at an engine speed of 2100 min-1. The nominal engine speed for petrodiesel was 2200 min-1, whereas the greatest engine power was accomplished at 2100 min-1 for all biodiesel blends. Even though 2%-4% reduction was obtained in fuel consumption by using biodiesel blends at 2100 min-1, the mean fuel consumption was statistically insignificant (P > 0.05), whereas average fuel consumption was higher with petrodiesel at 2200 min-1 (P < 0.05). It was concluded that B20 (20% biodiesel + 80% petrodiesel) could be a more efficient alternative to petrodiesel fuel.

Abstract

Tractor performance tests conducted under laboratory test conditions are important because these tests determine the performance characteristics used to compare strengths and weaknesses of tractors. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of diesel fuel (B0) and 3 different biodiesel blends made of canola oil (B10, B20, B30) on tractor power take-off (PTO) performance characteristics. Performance characteristics studied were PTO power, engine torque, engine fuel consumption, and specific fuel consumption on an agricultural tractor (Massey Ferguson 3056 2WD) at the test laboratory of the Directorate of Agricultural Machinery Test Center (TAMTEST), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ankara, Turkey. The maximum PTO power (32.35 ± 0.06 kW), the minimum specific fuel consumption (288.72 ± 0.11 g Kw-1 h-1), and the minimum fuel consumption (11.08 ± 0.13 L h-1) were achieved by using B20 at an engine speed of 2100 min-1. The nominal engine speed for petrodiesel was 2200 min-1, whereas the greatest engine power was accomplished at 2100 min-1 for all biodiesel blends. Even though 2%-4% reduction was obtained in fuel consumption by using biodiesel blends at 2100 min-1, the mean fuel consumption was statistically insignificant (P > 0.05), whereas average fuel consumption was higher with petrodiesel at 2200 min-1 (P < 0.05). It was concluded that B20 (20% biodiesel + 80% petrodiesel) could be a more efficient alternative to petrodiesel fuel.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYBEK, A., BAŞER, E., ARSLAN, S., ÜÇGÜL, M. (2011). Determination of the effect of biodiesel use on power take-off performance characteristics of an agricultural tractor in a test laboratory. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 103–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/180072

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Alpgiray B (2006) Determination of the eff ects of the canola oil on the performance and emission characteristics of the diesel engine. Master Th esis. Ankara University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences. Arapatsakos CU, Cristoforidis D, Karkanis A, Mitroulas D, Teka C (2007) Test results from the use of cotton oil mixtures as fuel in a four-stroke engine. International Journal of Energy and Environment 1: 179-187.
  2. Başer E, Aybek A (2009) Determination of the eff ect of biodiesel use on tractive force performance characteristics on agricultural tractors. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Journal of Engineering Sciences 12: 37-43.
  3. Emiroğlu H (2007) Determination of the eff ects of the usage of biodiesel fuel mixtures at diff erent rates on characteristics of agricultural tractor engine. Master Th esis. Adnan Menderes University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Aydın. EIE (2009) Technical properties of biodiesel as fuel. General Directorate of Electrical Power Resources Survey Administration. http://www.eie.gov.tr/biyodizel/bd_teknikoz. html, 03.03.2009.
  4. Grisso RD, Morgan DL, Shropshire GJ, Rockwell SK (1988) What information helps a farmer purchase a tractor? American Society of Agricultural Engineers 4: 197-200.
  5. Karaosmanoğlu F (2005) Biodiesel and automotive industry. Automotive Industry Association Conference, İstanbul.
  6. Liljedahl JB, Turnquist PK, Smith DW, Hoki M (1996) Tractors and Th eir Power Units. Fourth Edition. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. ASAE Textbook No: 801P0196. NBB (2003) Regulated fl eet use of biodiesel frequently asked questions. Th e National Biodiesel Board. http://www. biodiesel.org/pdf_fi les/fuelfactsheets/RegulatedFleet_QA.pdf, 03.06.2008.
  7. OECD (2008) OECD Standard Code 2 for the offi cial testing of agricultural and forestry tractor performance. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Oğuz H, Öğüt H (2001) Th e investigation of the possibilities of using vegetable oils based on farm tractor. Selçuk Teknik Online Dergisi 2: http://alaeddin.cc.selcuk.edu.tr/~tekbil/Ekim2001- Ocakl2002/h_oguz/h_oguz.htm, 03.01.2008.
  8. Öğüt H, Oğuz H (2006) Th e fuel of the third millennium, biodiesel. Edition number: 745, Science and Biology Publications: 33, Ankara.
  9. Öztürk MG, Bilen K (2009) Experimental investigation on the eff ect of canola oil’s methyl ester and its blends on diesel engine performance. Int J Eng Research & Development 1: 35-41.
  10. Rodjanakid K, Charoenphonphanich C (2004) Internatio