Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 6

Comparison of Decomposition Rates of Beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) and Spruce (Picea orientalis (L.) Link) Litter in Pure and Mixed Stands of Both Species in Artvin, Turkey

Sayfa
429–438
Yayın Tarihi
2005-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Therefore, the establishment of mixed beech and spruce stands can counteract detrimental processes in decomposition associated with spruce monocultures.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The decomposition of spruce, beech and mixed litters of spruce and beech was investigated over 3.5 years in beech, spruce and mixed (beech/spruce) stands using less than 1.5 mm mesh litter bags.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For all sampling intervals, mixed litters showed higher decay rates than individual beech and spruce litters in both pure stands and mixed stands.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Therefore, the establishment of mixed beech and spruce stands can counteract detrimental processes in decomposition associated with spruce monocultures.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Decomposition · litter quality · beech

Özet

The decomposition of spruce, beech and mixed litters of spruce and beech was investigated over 3.5 years in beech, spruce and mixed (beech/spruce) stands using less than 1.5 mm mesh litter bags. Initially, carbon, nitrogen, lignin and cellulose concentrations, and C:N and lignin:N ratios were determined in beech and spruce litters. For all sampling intervals, mixed litters showed higher decay rates than individual beech and spruce litters in both pure stands and mixed stands. Spruce decomposed more rapidly than beech, and initial lignin concentration explained most of the variation in decomposition rates between beech and spruce. However, differences in decomposition rates between beech and spruce were most pronounced in the mixed stand, while they were intermediate in the beech stand and least pronounced in the spruce stand. This shows that adverse environmental conditions, mostly associated with a lower pH content of the soil under spruce stands, retard decomposition processes and individual litters appear to be more sensitive to this retardation than mixed litters. The results also indicate that abiotic and microbial factors in mixed stands could be better than those in pure stands of spruce and beech. Therefore, the establishment of mixed beech and spruce stands can counteract detrimental processes in decomposition associated with spruce monocultures.

Abstract

The decomposition of spruce, beech and mixed litters of spruce and beech was investigated over 3.5 years in beech, spruce and mixed (beech/spruce) stands using less than 1.5 mm mesh litter bags. Initially, carbon, nitrogen, lignin and cellulose concentrations, and C:N and lignin:N ratios were determined in beech and spruce litters. For all sampling intervals, mixed litters showed higher decay rates than individual beech and spruce litters in both pure stands and mixed stands. Spruce decomposed more rapidly than beech, and initial lignin concentration explained most of the variation in decomposition rates between beech and spruce. However, differences in decomposition rates between beech and spruce were most pronounced in the mixed stand, while they were intermediate in the beech stand and least pronounced in the spruce stand. This shows that adverse environmental conditions, mostly associated with a lower pH content of the soil under spruce stands, retard decomposition processes and individual litters appear to be more sensitive to this retardation than mixed litters. The results also indicate that abiotic and microbial factors in mixed stands could be better than those in pure stands of spruce and beech. Therefore, the establishment of mixed beech and spruce stands can counteract detrimental processes in decomposition associated with spruce monocultures.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SARIYILDIZ, T., TÜFEKÇİOĞLU, A., KÜÇÜK, M. (2005). Comparison of Decomposition Rates of Beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) and Spruce (Picea orientalis (L.) Link) Litter in Pure and Mixed Stands of Both Species in Artvin, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 6, 429–438. https://ajindex.com/articles/179811

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Albers, D., S. Migge, M. Schaefer and S. Scheu. 2003. Decomposition of beech leaves (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce needles (Picea abies) in pure and mixed stands of beech and spruce, Soil. Biol. Biochem. 36: 155-164.
  2. Allen, S.E. 1989. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. Anderson, J.M. and J.S.I. Ingram. (Eds.), 1993. Tropical soil biology and fertility. A handbook for methods. CAB International, Oxon. Anderson, J.M. 1973. The breakdown and decomposition of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) leaf litter in two deciduous woodland soils. II. Changes in the carbon, nitrogen and polyphenol content. Oecologia. 12: 275-288.
  3. Anderson, J.P.E. and K.H. Domsch. 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10: 215-221.
  4. Bauhus, J., Pare, D., Cote, L., 1998. Effects of tree species stand age and soil type on soil microbial biomass and its activity in a south- ern boreal forest. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 30: 1077-1098.
  5. Berg, B., M. Berg, P. Bottner, E. Box, A. Breymeyer, de Anta R. Calvo, M.M. Couteaux, A. Gallardo, A. Escudero, W. Kartz, M. Maderia, E. Malkonen, V. Couteaux, P. Bottner and B. Berg. 1995. Litter decomposition, climate and litter quality. Trends in Ecol. Evol. 10: 63-66.
  6. Blair, J.M., R.W. Parmelee and M.H. Beare. 1990. Decay rates, nitro- gen fluxes, and decomposer communities of single- and mixed- species foliar litter. Ecology. 71: 1976-1985.
  7. Briones, M.J.I. and P. Ineson. 1996. Decomposition of eucalyptus leaves in litter mixtures. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28: 1381-1388.
  8. Chadwick, D.R., P. Ineson, C. Woods and T. Piearce. 1998. Decompo- sition of Pinus sylvestris litter in litter bags: influence of underly- ing native litter layer. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30: 47-55.
  9. Chapman, K., J.B. Whittaker and O.W. Heal. 1988. Metabolic and fau- nal activity in litters of tree mixtures compared with pure stands. Agric.-Ecosyst. Environ. 24: 33-40.
  10. Cox, P., S.P. Wilkinson and J.M. Anderson. 2001. Effects of fungal inocula on the decomposition of lignin and structural polysaccha- rides in Pinus sylvestris litter. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 33: 246-251.
  11. Gartner, T.B. and Z.G. Cardon. 2004. Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter. Oikos. 104: 230-246.
  12. Gosz, J.K., E. Likens and F.H. Bormann. 1973. Nutrient release from decomposing leaf and branch litter in the Hubbard Brook Forest, New Hampshire. Ecol. Monographs. 43: 173-1