Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1

Use of N and P biofertilizers reduces inorganic phosphorus application and increases nutrient uptake, yield, and seed quality of chickpea

Sayfa
47–54
Yayın Tarihi
2014-05-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, P30 × BNF+BPF saved 30 kg P ha-1 of the costly inorganic P fertilizer to achieve the greatest crop yield and quality.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Leguminous crops suffer severely in soils poor in phosphorus.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A 2-factor factorial experiment was conducted in a net-house to explore the effect of graded levels of P fertilizer (0, 30, and 60 kg P ha-1 or P0, P30, and P60, respectively) together with rhizobium (biological nitrogen fertilizer (BNF)) and/or phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (biological phosphorus fertilizer (BPF)) in terms of nutrient uptake, yield, and quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, P30 × BNF+BPF saved 30 kg P ha-1 of the costly inorganic P fertilizer to achieve the greatest crop yield and quality.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Key words: Cicer arietinum · nutrient uptake · phosphorus levels

Özet

Leguminous crops suffer severely in soils poor in phosphorus. A 2-factor factorial experiment was conducted in a net-house to explore the effect of graded levels of P fertilizer (0, 30, and 60 kg P ha-1 or P0, P30, and P60, respectively) together with rhizobium (biological nitrogen fertilizer (BNF)) and/or phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (biological phosphorus fertilizer (BPF)) in terms of nutrient uptake, yield, and quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Phosphorus was applied as basal dose, while seeds were treated with respective biofertilizer(s) before sowing according to the treatments [BF0 (control), BNF, BPF, and BNF+BPF]. Concerning the main effects, P60 proved superior or equivalent to P30, while among the biofertilizer treatments, BNF+BPF gave the greatest values for nutrient uptake as well as for yield and quality parameters. The interaction between P levels and biofertilizer treatments was generally significant. 30 kg P ha-1 applied with N and P biofertilizers (P30 × BNF+BPF) was the most profitable interaction for N uptake as well as for yield and quality characteristics. Compared to P60 applied alone (P60 × BF0), P30 × BNF+BPF resulted in greater N uptake (27.3%), seed yield (21.1%), and the content of seed protein (2.9%) and carbohydrate (5.6%). Furthermore, P30 × BNF+BPF was statistically equal to P60 × BNF+BPF with regard to N uptake, seed yield, and protein content as well as for most yield components. Thus, P30 × BNF+BPF saved 30 kg P ha-1 of the costly inorganic P fertilizer to achieve the greatest crop yield and quality.

Abstract

Leguminous crops suffer severely in soils poor in phosphorus. A 2-factor factorial experiment was conducted in a net-house to explore the effect of graded levels of P fertilizer (0, 30, and 60 kg P ha-1 or P0, P30, and P60, respectively) together with rhizobium (biological nitrogen fertilizer (BNF)) and/or phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (biological phosphorus fertilizer (BPF)) in terms of nutrient uptake, yield, and quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Phosphorus was applied as basal dose, while seeds were treated with respective biofertilizer(s) before sowing according to the treatments [BF0 (control), BNF, BPF, and BNF+BPF]. Concerning the main effects, P60 proved superior or equivalent to P30, while among the biofertilizer treatments, BNF+BPF gave the greatest values for nutrient uptake as well as for yield and quality parameters. The interaction between P levels and biofertilizer treatments was generally significant. 30 kg P ha-1 applied with N and P biofertilizers (P30 × BNF+BPF) was the most profitable interaction for N uptake as well as for yield and quality characteristics. Compared to P60 applied alone (P60 × BF0), P30 × BNF+BPF resulted in greater N uptake (27.3%), seed yield (21.1%), and the content of seed protein (2.9%) and carbohydrate (5.6%). Furthermore, P30 × BNF+BPF was statistically equal to P60 × BNF+BPF with regard to N uptake, seed yield, and protein content as well as for most yield components. Thus, P30 × BNF+BPF saved 30 kg P ha-1 of the costly inorganic P fertilizer to achieve the greatest crop yield and quality.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UDDIN, M., HUSSAIN, S., KHAN, M. M. A., HASHMI, N., IDREES, M., NAEEM, M., DAR, T. A. (2014). Use of N and P biofertilizers reduces inorganic phosphorus application and increases nutrient uptake, yield, and seed quality of chickpea. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1, 47–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/179681

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Aslam M, Ahmad HK, Himayatullah AM, Ahmad E, Sagoo AG, Hussain IUA, Manzoor M (2010) Nodulation, grain yield and grain protein contents as affected by rhizobium inoculation and fertilizer placement in chickpea cultivar bittle-98. Sarhad J Agric 26: 467–474.
  2. Bahadur MM, Ashrafuzzaman M, Kabir MA, Choudhary MF, Majumdar AN (2002) Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties to different levels of phosphorus. Crop Res 23: 293–299.
  3. Chavan PG, Shinde VS, Solunke PS, Kote GM, Bhondve AA (2008) Response of sources and levels of phosphorus with and without PSB inoculation on yield, economics and uptake of soybean. Crop Res 35: 17–20.
  4. Dutta D, Prohit B (2009) Performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to application of phosphorus and biofertilizer in laterite soil. Arch Agron Soil Sci 55: 147–155.
  5. Elsheikh EAE, Mohamedzein EMM (1998)
  6. Effect of bradyrhizobium, VA mycorrhiza and fertilizers on seed composition of groundnut. Ann Appl Biol 132: 325–330.
  7. Fatima Z, Zia M, Chaudhary MF (2007) Interactive effect of Rhizobium strains and P on soybean yield, nitrogen fixation and soil fertility. Pak J Bot 39: 255–264.
  8. Fiske CH, Subbarow Y (1925) The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. J Biol Chem 66: 375–400.
  9. Gitari JN, Mureithi JG (2003) Effect of phosphorus fertilization on legume nodule formation and biomass production in Mount Kenya Region. East Afr Agric For J 69: 183–187.
  10. Gupta SC, Sukhlal N, Paliwal KK, Namdeo S (1998) Effect of P levels and microbial inoculants on symbiotic traits, N and P uptake, quality and yield of rain fed chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Grain Legumes: Opportunities for High Quality, Healthy and Added-value Crops to Meet European Demands. Paris, France: European Association for Grain Legume Research, pp. 418– 4 Jain PC, Kushawaha PS, Dhakal US, Khan H, Trivedi SM (1999) Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to phosphorus and biofertilizer. Legume Res 22: 241–244.
  11. Jat RS, Ahlawat IPS (2006) Direct and residual effect of vermicompost, biofertilizers and phosphorus on soil nutrient dynamics and productivity of chickpea-fodder maize sequence. J Sustain Agric 28: 41–54.
  12. Khanda CM, Mahapatra AK, Misra PK (2001) Response of rice bean (Vigna umbellata) to row spacing and phosphorus under rainfed condition. Ann Agric Res 22: 481–484.
  13. Kumar R, Chandra R (2008) Influence of PGPR and PSB on Rhizobium leguminosarum Bv. viciae strain competition and symbiotic performance in lentil. World J Agr